[Jarvio]

In my opinion, the Allstars should consist of the winners only.

Here's why:

1 - I just think it's the logical thing to do. They were the ones that won their crown fair and square, and therefore, it would make sense to give them the chance to battle it out for the ultimate winner. A bit like a tournament final.

2 - People want many certain HMs to go in - Makosi, Nikki etc, people that HAVEN'T won. There are so many diverging opinions, and nobody will agree, and there will always be someone that is pissed off. But if all the winners went in, then (even though people might still be pissed off) at least there is a legitimate, justified, and logical reason why the winners are there (seeing as they won their respective shows).

3 - I also think it's the most logical thing to do in terms of HM popularity anyway. Afterall, each winner of each year was, in terms of voting, the most popular of that year. So I think the majority would be pretty happy anyway. (I know Cameron would be there, which people wouldn't like, but it wouldn't be right not to represent every series).

4 - Would consist of just 11 HMs. Not too many, and so the perfect amount anyway for these final 2 weeks IMO.

What does everyone think?

Craig BB1
Brian BB2
Kate BB3
Cameron BB4
Nadia BB5
Anthony BB6
Pete BB7
Brian BB8
Rachael BB9
Sophie BB10
And whoever wins BB11

[Smithy]

The winners weren't necessarily the most entertaining characters, i.e. BB9 & BB4

so for me, not just winners

[Claymores]

Winners only wouldn't give sufficient numbers. For example, Cameron doesn't seem to have any wish to return, and I'm sure Kate is busier with, and prefers, her real job.

Out of the winners, it's only really the unemplyed/unemployable ones that would agree (Brian Belo........)

[BigBrotherfan4ever]

I wouldn't want it to be all the winners, cause some were so boring &...IMO should never have won.

[Tom4784]

I'd hate just having the winners, and plus it's not gonna happen since most of the earlier winners have careers or just don't want to come back. Focus on the fan favourites and people who made each series.

[bansheewails]

I don't want an allstars. As I said before, they have had their 15 minutes, time for the new Housemates to shine. 13 weeks of the new housemates please and forget the allstars thanks.

[Beastie]

Originally Posted by bansheewails

I don't want an allstars. As I said before, they have had their 15 minutes, time for the new Housemates to shine. 13 weeks of the new housemates please and forget the allstars thanks.

This is what I think or just do the allstars in January.. but unfortunately it is not going to happen and we just have to get used to the idea..

[bansheewails]

Originally Posted by thebeast

This is what I think or just do the allstars in January.. but unfortunately it is not going to happen and we just have to get used to the idea..

I might huff and not watch it.

[starry]

Originally Posted by Jarvio

In my opinion, the Allstars should consist of the winners only.

Here's why:

1 - I just think it's the logical thing to do. They were the ones that won their crown fair and square, and therefore, it would make sense to give them the chance to battle it out for the ultimate winner. A bit like a tournament final.

2 - People want many certain HMs to go in - Makosi, Nikki etc, people that HAVEN'T won. There are so many diverging opinions, and nobody will agree, and there will always be someone that is pissed off. But if all the winners went in, then (even though people might still be pissed off) at least there is a legitimate, justified, and logical reason why the winners are there (seeing as they won their respective shows).

3 - I also think it's the most logical thing to do in terms of HM popularity anyway. Afterall, each winner of each year was, in terms of voting, the most popular of that year. So I think the majority would be pretty happy anyway. (I know Cameron would be there, which people wouldn't like, but it wouldn't be right not to represent every series).

4 - Would consist of just 11 HMs. Not too many, and so the perfect amount anyway for these final 2 weeks IMO.

What does everyone think?

Craig BB1
Brian BB2
Kate BB3
Cameron BB4
Nadia BB5
Anthony BB6
Pete BB7
Brian BB8
Rachael BB9
Sophie BB10
And whoever wins BB11

You describe Big Brother as 'fair and square'?

[Jarvio]

Originally Posted by bansheewails

I don't want an allstars. As I said before, they have had their 15 minutes, time for the new Housemates to shine. 13 weeks of the new housemates please and forget the allstars thanks.

I definitely agree with this. Never been a fan of the allstars idea. However, if they have to do it, then I say winners only. But yeah, if I had the choice, I'd say no allstars at all really!