[starry]

They should introduce the walkers first followed by those who actually left by the front door. It should be in that order.

[Lewis.]

I think it makes more sense just to do it in the correct order.

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

Originally Posted by starry

They should introduce the walkers first followed by those who actually left by the front door. It should be in that order.

nah I think when they walk their existence becomes NULL so therefore they shouldn't be acknowledged

[Lewis.]

Originally Posted by Ithinkiloveyoutoo

nah I think when they walk their existence becomes NULL so therefore they shouldn't be acknowledged

I suppose they were a part of it for a little while though. Most of the time I expect there are other reasons for someone leaving that you don't quite know about. It probably feels different when you are in the house. It's one of those things that you don't know what it feels like until you've experienced it. Some cope better than others and some crack under the constant idea of living in a game.

[Jordan.]

I like it when they do it in the order of which they left. I think it was last year they brought them up in couples and it just failed.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Lewis.

I think it makes more sense just to do it in the correct order.

This.

[starry]

I don't like it as couples at all, and I also like to see them walk to the platform not just be introduced already on it (like I think they did one year).

Walkers do get too much good treatment though and I think they should be introduced in a different way or separately. I'm sure they did that long ago, nowadays they just pander to some HMs who they like and it's nauseating.

[Kaaarenn!]

Originally Posted by Lewis.

I think it makes more sense just to do it in the correct order.

Me too.