[WOMBAI]

Before watching the show more and coming on the forums - I used to think people who claimed bb was a fix and favouring certain hms were just poor losers and making a fuss over nothing! But I have changed my mind!

To me, this year in particular, it has been painfully obvious that bb favour their fake 'romance' duo and want them in the final! The double-standards in punishments between those two and other hms, such as Dave, is so blatant - they don't even attempt to hide it!

I think it is disgraceful - especially bearing in mind they are making a fortune out of the public in votes - and is a total rip off! TV Ofcom should investigate it! The last ever series will have a black cloud hanging over it - ruining the memory of it! Opinions please!

[Zippy]

Well you know I agree already!

Shameful. We all know theyll be sat there on the sofa holding hands final night.

Zzzzzzz

[Claymores]

Originally Posted by WOMBAI

I used to think people who claimed bb was a fix and favouring certain hms were just poor losers and making a fuss over nothing!!

You were and still would be correct.

[Jords]

You know I agree too Wombai!
Its disgusting and killing Big Brother, this series has been a wash-out.

[Julie10]

I agree with you. its clear that they want certain hms to reach the final. John and Josie in particular. John clearly mentioned that he has been looking forward to see who has been nominating him and it clearly put off some from nominating him. So there plan of having face to face noms worked in Johns favour no noms this week.

What a farce! The whole thing was a nonsense and I hope they just allow the public to vote out who they want out in future with the remaining hms left. Its not who they want to win its who we think deserves to win.

It has killed BB because they want to decide the winner.

[MissKittyFantastico]

BB are making it painfully obvious that they want Dave out, one rule for him and another for everyone else it seems, especially Josie and John James.

Her noms were a joke today as well, the whole house should have been put up and it should have been vote to save. I do partially blame the other HM's for not having the balls to nom either of them but even so. Those two are so blatantly going to be in the final now, it's ridiculous.

[Zippy]

Originally Posted by Kitty

Those two are so blatantly going to be in the final now, it's ridiculous.

The one saving grace is that come the final they will steal votes from each other and have a split share. Hopefully preventing each other from winning.

I think Dave will actually beat one of them.

[Tom4784]

Romances are always favoured, Look how much time has been devoted in previous series to the likes of Helen & Paul, Pete & Nikki, Chanelle & Ziggy, Noirin and half the house ETC.

It's nothing new, it's just a rare case that both HM's are popular with the general audience.

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by Kitty

BB are making it painfully obvious that they want Dave out, one rule for him and another for everyone else it seems, especially Josie and John James.

Her noms were a joke today as well, the whole house should have been put up and it should have been vote to save. I do partially blame the other HM's for not having the balls to nom either of them but even so. Those two are so blatantly going to be in the final now, it's ridiculous.

BB certainly seem to be manipulating situations to create a more positive outcome for Josie and JJ - the noms today a good example of that! They should have been done in private, where there was no chance of anyone intimidating anyone else - and yes a vote to save was in order.

BB just change the rules to suit - enabling them to manipulate the outcome! This would have been my last year of watching - even if there had of been another series - I just couldn't stand watching all this crap again!

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by Julie10

I agree with you. its clear that they want certain hms to reach the final. John and Josie in particular. John clearly mentioned that he has been looking forward to see who has been nominating him and it clearly put off some from nominating him. So there plan of having face to face noms worked in Johns favour no noms this week.

What a farce! The whole thing was a nonsense and I hope they just allow the public to vote out who they want out in future with the remaining hms left. Its not who they want to win its who we think deserves to win.

It has killed BB because they want to decide the winner.

Spot on - that is exactly want they want! If they weren't so clever with their wording of the rules and regs - stating that they can make whatever rule changes they wish - it would be fraud, in my book (because of the money involved) - morally it still is!

[Zippy]

Originally Posted by WOMBAI

fraud

the show is a fraud.

The producers can go down to the bookies and bet on the winner they will then choose. They can manipulate hugely...and they do!

Its why I never ever vote on these shows. I refuse to buy into it and give them my money. **** that.

[Omah]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Romances are always favoured, Look how much time has been devoted in previous series to the likes of Helen & Paul, Pete & Nikki, Chanelle & Ziggy, Noirin and half the house ETC.

It's nothing new, it's just a rare case that both HM's are popular with the general audience.

Pete and Nikki was a fraud, Chanelle and Ziggy was a fraud, Noirin and her boyfriend were frauds .....

Helen and Paul were real .....

..... and you forgot Michelle and Stuart, who lasted for a year after their series finished .....

[Lex]

Originally Posted by WOMBAI

Before watching the show more and coming on the forums - I used to think people who claimed bb was a fix and favouring certain hms were just poor losers and making a fuss over nothing! But I have changed my mind!

To me, this year in particular, it has been painfully obvious that bb favour their fake 'romance' duo and want them in the final! The double-standards in punishments between those two and other hms, such as Dave, is so blatant - they don't even attempt to hide it!

I think it is disgraceful - especially bearing in mind they are making a fortune out of the public in votes - and is a total rip off! TV Ofcom should investigate it! The last ever series will have a black cloud hanging over it - ruining the memory of it! Opinions please!

Of course!!....you are 100% correct!! ....Sad really!

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

add me to the list of believers too now. sad day

[WOMBAI]

Josie's talk of nominations last week, along with the others, is a typical example of the double-standards! I thought the bb camera's never miss anything - so how come they didn't see or hear Josie discussing nominations when they heard the rest.

It wasn't until others complained about it on the forums - that Davina announced Josie had indeed discussed nominations and would also be punished! All incredibly suspicious!

[Vicky.]

Its always been the same. Selective punishments.

The most obvious really, was lisa last year. Getting away with many rulebreaks while others were punished for the exact same thing. The only week she was up for eviction, they changed it to vote to save to give her more of a chance.

The problem is, whilst its housemates YOU support, you dont notice the biased editing etc. quite so much, and think others are moaning about nothing.

It has shown to me a lot more this year, as I dont really support any of them.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Omah

Pete and Nikki was a fraud, Chanelle and Ziggy was a fraud, Noirin and her boyfriend were frauds .....

Helen and Paul were real .....

..... and you forgot Michelle and Stuart, who lasted for a year after their series finished .....

Hardly matters if the relationships are real or not, as long as it's a storyline in the house the production team will use it. JJJ is the biggest storyline this year so the production team are obviously gonna focus on it.

The same would apply if it was anyone else.

[Captain.Remy]

Well, I hate to say this but to be honest, this year's cast has been one of the weakest in 10 years: it has no substance, no real big personalities, people you can relate to, no action, no drama, no arguments, no parties...NOTHING. Therefore I can see why JJ and Josie take 99% of the HL shows because it's pretty much the only thing worth watchable.

Now we've got Sam who is a pain in the a$$ but he brings matter to the show (just like Charley/Grace/Bea was...). We still have Andrew who's a funny lad to watch.

[joeysteele]

wombai,you and I don't agree on many things but on this I do agree with you 100%, there has been a bit of bias in past BBs but never like there is here, all of the BB production teams energy is going into ensuring by hook or by crook JJames and Josie will be there for the final day.
I actually contacted Channel 4 and made this point several times as to the time JJames and Josie's sham of a romance was getting in reality on all BB broadcasting but particularly in the highlights, I also pointed out the rediculous puny punishments given to them both as opposed to others.
I really began this with the stupid punishment BEN got when refusing to do such punishment for being asked to do such a stupid task in the first place from the tree.

I got from Channel 4, the reply that BB was strictly regulated as to presentation of the housemates fairly and that all housemates got the same equal editing and content in programming.
After 3 replies like that I went back after my friends had done a stopwatch timing of a highlights programme whereby in a 70 minute programme, (with around 12 minutes break for adverts and start and end of the programme), that out of the remaining 58 minutes max, JJames and Josie and this romance whatever was on that programme for 37 of the 58 minutes.

Channel 4 have never disputed that timing,I asked them did they think we viewers were so stupid that we couldnt take a stop watch and time it for ourselves?
They just then came back again and said they were sorry I was angry but they welcomed comments on programming complimentary or otherwise.

I ended with well, if there are regulators for this series of BB then they are asleep for most of it and not doing their job.

Wombai, I totally understand your frustration and annoyance, you are absolutely right on all your counts,this is the worst ever BB for bias to only 1 or 2 housemates,I could almost be convinced someone of JJames family has a vested interest in the programme.

It is annoying its totally unfair and if someone else takes on BB like Channel 5 then I hope the first thing they do is sack the current BB production team who have made this series a farce.

This series should have been the very best of all the ideas of previous BBs and it should have been unmissable but this production of BB has been turned into a farce and is more like unwatchable than unmissable.

[Julesuk]

I think they have been biased at times with a number of the housemates - John James and Josie have had there share of negativity from the producers also. I think they have been just as biased in the favour of Mario and when Ben was in there to. It is a game show and BB are in control - that has always been the case since day 1, we just have a different breed of contestants now. They cant control the public vote and John James has been up 3 or 4 times now and he is still there - thats not the producers fault.

[Mystic Mock]

i do agree they favour john james and josie but alot of them get favoured like when dave said govan was gone in week 2 it werent shown on the highlights,and he said ben was gone in week 7 and it werent shown on the highlights.

and mario and steve are allowed to perv over people but if it was dave he would have been chucked out.

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

wombai,you and I don't agree on many things but on this I do agree with you 100%, there has been a bit of bias in past BBs but never like there is here, all of the BB production teams energy is going into ensuring by hook or by crook JJames and Josie will be there for the final day.
I actually contacted Channel 4 and made this point several times as to the time JJames and Josie's sham of a romance was getting in reality on all BB broadcasting but particularly in the highlights, I also pointed out the rediculous puny punishments given to them both as opposed to others.
I really began this with the stupid punishment BEN got when refusing to do such punishment for being asked to do such a stupid task in the first place from the tree.

I got from Channel 4, the reply that BB was strictly regulated as to presentation of the housemates fairly and that all housemates got the same equal editing and content in programming.
After 3 replies like that I went back after my friends had done a stopwatch timing of a highlights programme whereby in a 70 minute programme, (with around 12 minutes break for adverts and start and end of the programme), that out of the remaining 58 minutes max, JJames and Josie and this romance whatever was on that programme for 37 of the 58 minutes.

Channel 4 have never disputed that timing,I asked them did they think we viewers were so stupid that we couldnt take a stop watch and time it for ourselves?
They just then came back again and said they were sorry I was angry but they welcomed comments on programming complimentary or otherwise.

I ended with well, if there are regulators for this series of BB then they are asleep for most of it and not doing their job.

Wombai, I totally understand your frustration and annoyance, you are absolutely right on all your counts,this is the worst ever BB for bias to only 1 or 2 housemates,I could almost be convinced someone of JJames family has a vested interest in the programme.

It is annoying its totally unfair and if someone else takes on BB like Channel 5 then I hope the first thing they do is sack the current BB production team who have made this series a farce.

This series should have been the very best of all the ideas of previous BBs and it should have been unmissable but this production of BB has been turned into a farce and is more like unwatchable than unmissable.

This series is going out with a bang of sorts - a bang of hugh disappointed and frustration by the viewers over what a biased load of rubbish it turned out to be! They will take their profits (our money) and run!

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by jedward fever

i do agree they favour john james and josie but alot of them get favoured like when dave said govan was gone in week 2 it werent shown on the highlights,and he said ben was gone in week 7 and it werent shown on the highlights.

and mario and steve are allowed to perv over people but if it was dave he would have been chucked out.

What about Josie's perving over JJ?

[joeysteele]

BB producers CAN control thr public vote to a degree whereby what they show as highlights and also in all other boradcasting too.

Push a message long enough even if its wrong like this daft false romance, then eventually someone will believe it is true or possible,what then happens is maximum coverage on one happening overrides and obliterates much of all else that is happening.

Its actually the very easiest form of manipulating the public votes,and how they vote,its an art,politicians do it all the time but when the people voting are paying to VOTE then to make those votes credible and valid the programmers are duty bound to have to match that and ensure what we see and ALL its content is planned with total fairness and integrity.

[WOMBAI]

We should all demand our money back!

ffs - this flaming forum - is going slow most of the time now - can't stand it!

The whole thing has been a big disappointment for me this year - the show itself and the slow forum! All feels very second rate!