[iRyan]

It's getting really really old.

Who gives a ****ing **** if someone has a 'gameplan'. In case you forgot, this whole show is a damn game. The point is to make it to the end and win.

If you were in there, wouldn't you want to do what you could to win?

EVERYONE in there is a gameplayer. It's a fact. They all want to make it to the final, and they'd be lying if they said otherwise.

[Claymores]

But you have to be seen to be playing your game in a fair and honest way if you wish to remain popular with viewers. When it starts to become obvious that you'd stand on others heads just to reach the end, then you start to incur the public wrath.

[Julesuk]

Sick to death of it too dont think anyone could keep a game plan up this whole time, they may have had one when they came in but would never be able to substain it. I think you just get those that are more determined to maybe step on peoples toes but they are probably like that outside the house. For me I look at their personalities and body language.

[crocs]

Yes, I'm sick of it too. But it was funny though that it was once again John James who was worried about Corin's gameplaying. The big gameplayer himself, the one that just minutes earlier said that he doesn't want to leave the house at all. Why is it alright for him to want it but not Corin?

[Julesuk]

I read it that John James was saying he didnt want to leave the house because it was like a bubble and that when he was out yesterday he couldnt wait to get back. I may have read it wrong but that was my take on it because he also said he didnt think he deserved to win because he comes from Australia and doesnt need the money.

[lynz]

Originally Posted by Julesuk

I read it that John James was saying he didnt want to leave the house because it was like a bubble and that when he was out yesterday he couldnt wait to get back. I may have read it wrong but that was my take on it because he also said he didnt think he deserved to win because he comes from Australia and doesnt need the money.

If what John James said is true then he really does have deep problems. How is he going to cope out of "his bubble" when BB is over. I am not that gullible and certainly don't believe any of his campaign speeches.

[Mr XcX]

I am not. People like Coringe go in with a gameplan when they say they do not, it just proves she is FAKE.

John James has a definite gameplan to be a knobhead

[ElProximo]

Originally Posted by iRyan

It's getting really really old.
Who gives a ****ing **** if someone has a 'gameplan'. In case you forgot, this whole show is a damn game. The point is to make it to the end and win.
If you were in there, wouldn't you want to do what you could to win?
EVERYONE in there is a gameplayer. It's a fact. They all want to make it to the final, and they'd be lying if they said otherwise.

Bang-on.
And a HM accusing another and vilifying another for having a 'gameplan' may very well be a 'gameplan' in itself.

It may very well be a good 'gameplan' to have no strategy or game play whatsoever. That can win the public.

You could be a 'BB9 Rex' and realize that a great game plan may be to be the 'anti-gameplayer'. He was about 1 or 2 seasons too late but it was a half-decent effort.

As for the public - they may REWARD someone who (for example) definitely did deliberately stay 'under the radar' and then float through the middle. Some viewers say 'GOOD!' and reward the cleverness.

but I do agree with the OP the only senseless thing is when some viewers 'catch out a game player' AHA!
They think they are 'exposing' someone for something that is nearly the entire point and premise of the very program they are watching lol.

What actually amazes me the most is how many viewers and even some forum mates (who ought know better by now) how many CANNOT tell which HM is hatching and working a game plan.

But here is a dilemma:
Do I vote FOR JJ to win it all BECAUSE he has absolutely run a perfect game from Day 1,
or,
Do I want to vote AGAINST him because, for whatever reasons, I disliked it and how it worked?

Some say you may vote FOR them because, after all, they DID do exactly what we ought to expect in BB in the first place.

[terryrow]

more game players on the forum than in the house.