[u_drunk]

After 2nite it should be "vote to save" because the likes of John, Sam and maybe josie will get evicted before JJ, Steve and Mario! And no matter how much you hate the first 3 they are far more entertaining that the other ones!!

Surely most people would agree with this?

[Jords]

Nope Im really pleased it isnt, start it next week.

[u_drunk]

Originally Posted by Jords

Nope Im really pleased it isnt, start it next week.

So u'd rather watch JJ and steve over the likes of John and Sam??

[Stacey.]

There's like a possible chance Mario could have gone with a vote to save so I'm pleased it's a vote to evict.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by u_drunk

So u'd rather watch JJ and steve over the likes of John and Sam??

Yes - sadly there are people like this intent on driving the show into the ground and have been for many years [not directed specifically at you Jords, btw].

Of course it should be Vote to Save. But even the producers are intent on ruining the show this year - so a Vote to Evict is the only option.

[Jords]

Originally Posted by u_drunk

So u'd rather watch JJ and steve over the likes of John and Sam??

It will be 4 days left, nothing drastic, I just want more of a chance to get rid of John James.

Anyhow, the other big characters, Corin, Sam and Josie, will all be safe anyway, we can lose any of the other 2 really (preferably not Dave though).

[Claymores]

If you think about it, they are somewhat compelled into a vote to Evict (if having a distinct weekly round). A vote to save immediately followed by a vote to win would be bound to attract public indignation......essentially you'd be asking people to vote for their fave this week coming, then expecting them to do it all over again from scratch for the finals vote – that makes no sense.

The logical alternative would have been a very long Vote to Win starting tonight, with the two with fewest win votes going next week and the vote count carrying on for those remaining