[parmnion]

pro's..it's unique in it's idea of uniting some of the best known and most loved/hated housemates in history, it has had some good moments so far. It is interesting to see what the housemates are like years after they first appeared on our screens.


Con's, where to start! All the housemates apart from a couple are just rehashing their old stories, nikki whining and gurning, nadia stropping and being nasty, preston chantelle(yuk) brian over camping it up, and now nick and victor boring us with supposed game playing with one more set of noms to go(yawn)

tasks are terrible, where's the treeeeeee!!! Are they really the best available housemates. The show is set to go out on a whimper rather than the bang predicted.

Absolutely no interesting conversations to chew on, housemates are far to guarded in saying what they really think.We are treading water until the end.. If something exciting does happen like coolio we are force fed half a story and left bemused by the editing of what happened..

worst of all, we still rant and rave about the bloody programme even when we get treated like numpties by the producers.

[setanta]

Pro's - Josie's gone
Con's - Josie was in it for a few days.

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by setanta

Pro's - Josie's gone
Con's - Josie was in it for a few days.

anymore?

[parmnion]

ah well, I tried to talk about bb..back to the task of destroying nadia love.

[astrozombiee]

Pro's: It's the last ever BB, it's interesting to see which HMS they picked and why, UBB is a good idea, Josie mingling with the "celebs" was epic.

Con's: It's boring, the HMs are boring, there's probably going to be a predictable little romance thing between Chantelle and Preston that will fizzle out in a couple of weeks, these arent the best HMs ever by far! Theres been NO DECENT ARGUMENTS and it looks set to be a bad series. Why they have to put in the "famous ones" instead of genuine good HMs like Mario, Rodrigo, Halfwit, Sree, Siavash, Sam Pepper etc.