FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
General Chat General discussion. Want to chat about anything not covered in another forum - This is the place! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
17-03-2011, 09:31 PM | #1 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
did you hear what crime eddison Joseph done ?
in the Camden new journal is a story that got me grinding my teeth, and i am calling for a petition on Hampstead Heath. if you are not meant to cycle in a park, then days are looking very dark. we have open space and there's plenty to go around, whats that i hear, is it a tractor or a police car sound. so 4 wheels are acceptable, but 2 are a danger, not sure about the reader, but the Joe has heard nothing stranger. Eddison Joseph is my example, this case brings shame, because gay sex is rife on the hampstead heath, who's responsible and to blame. what needs to happen is a "hampstead Heath act " of "respect", then everyone can use hampsted heath, and that's got to be correct. (in my local paper i see a guy was fined over £300 for rideing his bike on the heath. has this world gone mad? where else are you meant to chill and and relax and ride your bike. i think this is wrong and there are much better thing the poilce should be doing other then catching people on there bikes.) |
||
Reply With Quote |
17-03-2011, 09:36 PM | #2 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Like anyone cares, lulz
__________________
"Seeing Is Believing" |
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-03-2011, 10:16 PM | #3 | |||
|
||||
Account Vacant
|
Give us a clue here HARRY, was this Joseph fellow shagging his bike or something or did he interrupt you at work?
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-03-2011, 02:17 PM | #4 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
yes this guy was caught on hampstead heath riding his bike (wow big crime) my point is that the heath is massive and as long as everyone takes care there is no chance of any accidents and i can not see the fuss about not letting bikes up there.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
18-03-2011, 03:07 PM | #5 | |||
|
||||
Account Vacant
|
Quote:
It may be because of environmental damage done by cyclists failing to stay on approved paths, a large number of accidents caused by cyclists. Or something as simple as a monster increase in public liability insurance over some cycle related incidents. Whatever it was the local council should have had a public consultation and debated the ban before imposing it. Thats the problem with some local councils often they fail to publicise the reasons behind decisions effectively. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|