FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
BB12 Big Brother 12 started on Thursday Sept 9th 2011 on Channel 5 for a 9-week run. The series was won by Aaron. Tell us what you thought about the housemates and series in this forum. |
View Poll Results: ? | ||||||
Yes - Vote to Save + Evict Lines! | 3 | 11.11% | ||||
|
||||||
No - Just Vote to Save | 15 | 55.56% | ||||
|
||||||
No - Just Vote to Evict | 9 | 33.33% | ||||
|
||||||
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
29-10-2011, 04:08 AM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Focus
|
Tonight was great, it was wide open between Harry, Faye and Jay and even though I had an inkling Harry would be evicted I was no way 100% positive.
I think they should open Vote to Evict lines and Vote to Save lines when 3+ HMs are up. It will be harder to tell the outcome and surely Ch5 will make more money from it? Good idea?
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 05:16 AM | #2 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
They done this in the australian big brother and it just made it more confusing.
__________________
You don't have to be mad to post on tibb,But it helps |
||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 05:21 AM | #3 | |||
|
||||
MiddKid
|
Yeah, agreed. Two lines for each housemate seems cool in theory but for the casual viewer it's just too much to process. Dedicated forum-goers like us would get it, but most wouldn't. One of the last few things that has remained (mostly) intact for BB has been the format - changing the voting system that drastically would put people off.
__________________
Ratin': Lauren, Benedict, Lydia, Deana, Luke S., Sara I'm a fan: Caroline, Scott, Adam Dislike: Luke A., Becky Hatin': Chris, Victoria, Shievonne, Ashleigh, Conor, Arron |
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 05:23 AM | #4 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
The thing that makes evictions so boring is telling the viewers and the housemates who got the most most votes to save its the dumbest idea since the tibb big brother 11 forum skin.
Telling the housemates and us who got the most votes to save every week is just idiotic. Last edited by billy123; 29-10-2011 at 05:24 AM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 05:32 AM | #5 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Why are they telling them who is the most popular 2 weeks before the end?? They should of just put the top 2 through in no particular order.
__________________
You don't have to be mad to post on tibb,But it helps |
||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 05:39 AM | #6 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
C5 and endemol made so many good noises when they got big brother back on our screens and have clutched defeat from the jaws of victory. I can only imagine the people in control are kids desperate to try anything crazy and zany to make a difference when the real key to make it a success was right under their noses and they missed it |
||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 08:40 AM | #7 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Vote to Save has worked so much better then Vote to Evict; Aaron would have gone by now if there was.
1. Anton survived longer (vote to evict he would have gone) 2. Aden went, he would have been safe in vote to evict. 3. Aaron would not have srivived 4 evictions in a vote to evict - FACT! 4. Heaven had a better chance of staying in SAVE vote. 0.5% as opposed to 78% to evict. However VOTE TO SAVE does not work on 1 v1 evictions; We lost; Maisy Rebekah to vote to saves where they acted like EVICT votes. I say why dont we have; 1. Instead of 2 there are top 3 housemates nominated each week. This eliminates strong charcters going in a head to head in the early weeks. Losing Rebekah (even if you hated her) was bad so early on. 2. Vote to save remains 3. Week 1 has no eviction - so we can get to know them better, becuase for all we know Tashie could have been the greatest housemate ever.
__________________
LOVE: LIKE: MEH: DISLIKE: MY HOF: Deana (BB13), Aaron (BB12), Aisylene (BB7), Nikki (BB7) Last edited by Craiggy; 29-10-2011 at 08:41 AM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 08:47 AM | #8 | |||
|
||||
75% Trish
|
Quote:
Maybe we could have some sort of 'probation' or 'parole' scheme where the first time they get evicted, they survive the following week but only if they are not up for nomination again the following week? I'd Imagine some of the hated housemates having to backtrack and suck up to the people who nominated them. I hate losing characters from the house because it always seems so empty afterwards. Either that, or have vote to 'remove chance of winning' so they can stay in the house but can no longer win the show.. or maybe have all the housemates enter the house again for the last two weeks or so, but only the ones who survived have a chance of winning. Last edited by fruit_cake; 29-10-2011 at 08:50 AM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 08:59 AM | #9 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Vote to save has been slightly less predictable but I feel it is just another nail in the coffin which takes it even further away from a reality show 24/7 where you can 'oot' the twonks. What 'twist' next? X factor invented this vote to save crapola.............c5 took it one step further - manipulate the eviction to get even more votes, then use FB credits.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 09:11 AM | #10 | |||
|
||||
75% Trish
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 09:54 AM | #11 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I like the vote to save best, but i wish they didnt read out the order of who got the most votes.
I think doing it this way gives to much information from the outside world and gives the hms ideas on who to target in the nominations. |
||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 10:16 AM | #12 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
No, I have always wanted vote to save and so would not like that changed at all now.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 10:18 AM | #13 | |||
|
||||
Senior Moment Member
|
I have never liked vote to save and said so before BB even went to C5. They should go back to vote to evict for the next series.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 10:19 AM | #14 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
I like vote to save and I like the fact that they tell them who is 1st, 2nd etc. its another head **** IMO.
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' |
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 10:19 AM | #15 | |||
|
||||
R.I.P. Kerry
|
I prefer vote to evict, but I wouldn't want to change that this series as it would just cause confusion, so I voted for the save vote.
I would like to see next year go back to vote to evict.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 10:20 AM | #16 | |||
|
||||
R.I.P. Kerry
|
I agree with this.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 10:24 AM | #17 | ||
|
|||
Pyramid*
|
They need to keep the current voting process in this show - especially when they announce who received the most votes to save in highest order.
It's a great way of playing mind games with the housemates. Bearing in mind, they (and we) don't know what the variance really is: it could be a tiny difference of 0.5% between them all ....... but it's the EFFECT is had, that works as well as it does. Especially where Aaron is concerned, given that 4 times now, he's been up and 4 times now, he's come tops. That's got to play heavily on minds..... and it's a great idea. |
||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 10:34 AM | #18 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Vote to evict was the basis of that show..........an unpopularity contest where the public could get rid of horrors. I'm sorry joey that I disagree strongly and go with the others who say 'back to basics'. I believe the c5/Endthemall execs had a passing notion that 'social media' was the BIG thing, hence no live feed, concentrate to craploa like FB/Twatter. Hence the devastating viewing figures
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 10:37 AM | #19 | |||
|
||||
Like a fine whiskey
|
Quote:
__________________
It's never too late to be who you once could have been... Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 10:39 AM | #20 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
If yer gonna have Vote to Save, you might as well have the HMs nominating to save in DR each week...............it's only fair.
It's totally out of context to the original BB |
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-10-2011, 11:16 AM | #21 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
They should just not call out the order they came.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|