FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-11-2012, 04:18 PM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
Colorado and Washington have become the first US states to legalise the possession and sale of cannabis for recreational use.
The ruling is in defiance of federal law, setting the stage for a possible showdown with the Obama administration. But another ballot measure to remove criminal penalties for personal possession and cultivation of recreational cannabis was defeated in Oregon, where significantly less money and campaign organisation was devoted to the cause. Supporters of a Colorado constitutional amendment legalising cannabis were the first to declare victory, and opponents conceded defeat, after returns showed the measure garnering nearly 53 per cent of the vote versus 47 per cent against. "Colorado will no longer have laws that steer people toward using alcohol, and adults will be free to use marijuana instead if that is what they prefer. And we will be better off as a society because of it," said Mason Tvert, co-director of the Colorado pro-legalisation campaign. The Drug Policy Alliance, a national advocacy group that backed the initiatives, said the outcome in Washington and Colorado reflected growing national support for liberalised cannabis laws, citing a Gallup poll last year that found 50 per cent of Americans favoured making it legal, against 46 per cent who were opposed. The outcomes in Colorado and Washington, which already have laws on the books legalising cannabis for medical purposes, put both states in further conflict with the federal government, which classifies cannabis as an illegal narcotic The US Department of Justice reacted to the measure's passage in Colorado by saying its enforcement policies remain unchanged. "We are reviewing the ballot initiative and have no additional comment at this time." Separately, medical cannabis measures were on the ballot in three other states, including Massachusetts, where CNN reported that voters approved an initiative to allow cannabis for medicinal reasons. Supporters there issued a statement declaring victory for what they described as "the safest medical marijuana law in the country". Oregon voters rejected a measure to legalise recreational use of cannabis. In Massachusetts voters approved use of medical cannabis, while Arkansas voters rejected it. In Montana, voters were leaning toward affirming a 2011 law that would scale back a 2004 initiative legalising medical marijuana. California, whose voters rejected a measure to legalise recreational use in 2010, was the first state to allow medical use in 1996. It is already permitted in 17 states and the District of Columbia. A measure that would have made Arkansas the first state in the South to legalise cannabis for medical purposes appeared headed for defeat by 51 per cent to 49 per cent with about 80 per cent of the vote tallied. Under the measures in Colorado and Washington, personal possession of up to an ounce (28.5g) of cannabis would be legal for anyone at least 21 years of age. They also will permit cannabis to be legally sold and taxed at state-licensed outlets in a system modeled after a regime many states have in place for alcohol sales. Oregon's initiative would have legalised state-licensed sales, as well as possession and cultivation of unlimited amounts of cannabis for personal recreational use. The Colorado measure will limit cultivation to six plants per person, but "grow-your-own" cannabis would be still be banned altogether in Washington state |
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 04:21 PM | #2 | |||
|
||||
Jessica Meuse was robbed.
|
Well i've never seen that much of a problem with Cannabis anyway so I think these two states have made the right decision.
__________________
I'm a sick bitch. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 04:23 PM | #3 | |||
|
||||
Ninastar
|
Just stupid
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 04:23 PM | #4 | |||
|
||||
Lee.
|
I ain't ever getting into a drugs debate in here again... last time I ended going off on one, calked somebody bad names and had to ban myself for about a year.
But yeah well done Colorado etc
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 04:24 PM | #5 | |||
|
||||
charlton lee bowyer
|
never going there then
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 04:25 PM | #6 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 04:25 PM | #7 | |||
|
||||
The Italian Job
|
i don't agree with it, but good luck to them. A brave decision.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 04:25 PM | #8 | |||
|
||||
His blood is bad.
|
Finally, about time!
Hopefully the rest of America will see the advantage of having it legal and then UK/Ireland will follow suit
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 04:25 PM | #9 | |||
|
||||
ॐ❤✌❤ॐ❤☯❤ॐ❤✌❤ॐ
|
It wont do anymore harm than smoking or alcohol so..
__________________
Spoiler: Last edited by Saph; 07-11-2012 at 04:26 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 04:27 PM | #10 | |||
|
||||
The Italian Job
|
But from the lighter drugs you can go to the heavier ones. I've seen it happen.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 04:27 PM | #11 | |||
|
||||
Lee.
|
Hahahahaha... ages ago, 2009
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 04:28 PM | #12 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 04:31 PM | #13 | |||
|
||||
Lee.
|
Quote:
At the time I had a few good reasons to be anti drugs, and sadly after the events of this year, I have even more reason to be
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 04:34 PM | #14 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
...aww....yes, it is hard not to get emotional about something which has personally touched your life...I'm sorry about that...
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 04:36 PM | #15 | |||
|
||||
Jessica Meuse was robbed.
|
Im sorry for your loss Lee.
__________________
I'm a sick bitch. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 04:45 PM | #16 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
I'm with you lee, I'm very anti drugs.
known 2 very good friends develop acute psychosis and paranoid schizophrenia after years of using cannabis. Coincidence?... Can't google any stats on here, but i'm guessing there is some strong evidence to support a correlation.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 04:47 PM | #17 | |||
|
||||
Ninastar
|
Quote:
(no pun intended) It's just made me think that there's going to be tons more roads accidents now. Drink driving is bad enough but this will definitely add to it
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 04:53 PM | #18 | |||
|
||||
Ż\_(ツ)_/Ż
|
People who smoke pot would smoke it with or without the state's permission - all this does is regulate it, make government money out of it and stop wasting police time on chasing it up. Good news
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 04:54 PM | #19 | |||
|
||||
The Italian Job
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 04:59 PM | #20 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I do believe pot can have some medicinal benefits too. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 05:05 PM | #21 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
It's a good decision, There's less health risks involved with Marijuana then there is with Alcohol or cigarettes and this will help bring more money in instead of it potentially going to a criminal element. There's very little reason not to legalise it really.
Last edited by Tom4784; 07-11-2012 at 05:05 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 05:15 PM | #22 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
Others are said to lead to the advancement of any underlying psychological conditions.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 05:17 PM | #23 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
This.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 05:19 PM | #24 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Miami or L.A following would be epic.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-11-2012, 05:20 PM | #25 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
So where does this leave the US in its "War on Drugs", does this mean some drugs are ok and others are a menace. Who decides this and when ?
Shades of Hypocrisy creeping in here methinks....!!! |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|