[arista]

I just can't believe it. The Chinese are creating killer flu?

[arista]

The Fecking BBC knew he was raping girls
Like Savile he was a top Presenter/star.

[arista]

BBC bosses 'knew all about Stuart Hall': Abuser 'had special room set aside to entertain lady friends at studios' as Corporation

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz2SE4hC3LY


Back in 1987

[Omah]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-22932222

BBC broadcaster Stuart Hall who admitted indecently assaulting 13 girls, one aged nine, is due to be sentenced later.

Hall, 83, from Wilmslow, Cheshire, pleaded guilty to 14 offences which occurred between 1967 and 1985.

One count of rape will lie on the court file.

Bang 'im up, yer 'onor .....

[arista]

Yes Lock him away

[lostalex]

The fact that he's basically lived a full life and has gotten away with it, just locking him up doesn't seem like enough punishment.

Situations like this, I would support torture. he deserves it.

he's 83 years old and he got away with it for all these years. if anyone deserves torture it's this piece of ****.

If you just putting him in jail he knows he's gonna die soon anyway, so what does he care, he feels like he got to do anything he wanted to whom ever he wanted and he never suffered any real consequences.

It's disgusting.

[arista]

No.2 of BBC child rapist


TV in those early days gave him power
and the BBC backed him up.

[Omah]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-22932222BBC broadcaster Stuart Hall has been sentenced to 15 months in jail for sexually abusing under-age girls.

Hall, 83, of Wilmslow, Cheshire, admitted 14 offences that occurred between 1967 and 1985.

One of the girls was nine years old when Hall assaulted her, Preston Crown Court heard.

Sentencing Hall, Judge Anthony Russell QC said: "It is clear from the victim statements that I have seen that your brazen attitude when first charged and the public protests of your innocence have added to the distress of some if not all of your victims."

Judge Russell said Hall had "given pleasure to millions of people" and was known for his "genial personality, charm, bonhomie and wit".

But the judge added: "There is a darker side to you, one hidden from public view until now, and a side which you were able to conceal taking advantage of your status as a well-liked celebrity."

The judge said for most of the offences the maximum sentence at the time they were committed was two years and five for the remainder.

He added: "The maximum sentence for this type of offence has been significantly increased, since these offences were committed, to ten years."

He should have got at least 5 years .....

[Nedusa]

So 15 months in Jail, minus time on remand say 1 Month leaves 14 Months. So 7 months to be served but bearing in mind the early release/Tag scheme he would actually be let out of Prison with an electronic Tag after 4 months.

So that works out 4 months for 14 victims say about 1 week per rape/offense

Yep........sounds like British justice to me.....!!!!!!!

[Omah]

Originally Posted by Nedusa

So 15 months in Jail, minus time on remand say 1 Month leaves 14 Months. So 7 months to be served but bearing in mind the early release/Tag scheme he would actually be let out of Prison with an electronic Tag after 4 months.

So that works out 4 months for 14 victims say about 1 week per rape/offense

Yep........sounds like British justice to me.....!!!!!!!

Well, at least he's alive to see his life in tatters .....

[CaudleHalbard]

Originally Posted by Nedusa

Yep........sounds like British justice to me.....!!!!!!!

Ah but in other countries in the EU the case would not even have got to court!

There's normally a time limit from the date the offence was committed: on average 12 years.

[lostalex]

There should have been an extra charge of COVERING IT UP for all these years.

The rape of children is bad enuf, but he should also be charged with a crime for covering it up for all these decades as well. can't they also charge him with crimes of covering it up??

He should never breathe free air before he dies. sick ****er.

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

Ah but in other countries in the EU the case would not even have got to court!

There's normally a time limit from the date the offence was committed: on average 12 years.

That's true, look at the European countries protecting Roman Polanski who drugged and raped a child and admitted it.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by arista

No.2 of BBC child rapist


TV in those early days gave him power
and the BBC backed him up.

The BBC are coming out really badly from these cases too.

I was stunned to hear his defence lawyer had stated something like that he had only committed these abuses against 13 victims as opposed to Savilles likely 1300.
What a ridiculous statement.

[arista]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

The BBC are coming out really badly from these cases too.

I was stunned to hear his defence lawyer had stated something like that he had only committed these abuses against 13 victims as opposed to Savilles likely 1300.
What a ridiculous statement.

This is because The BBC is so Big
they let stars like Hall have a Total Private room
in BBC studios.
a 9 year old girl would go back with him
thinking he is the funny star of Its a Knockout
and to her horror The Evil S. Hall Rapes her.


Many are shouting give hime years inside
not under a year total time etc.

[Omah]

http://news.sky.com/story/1104682/st...views-sentence

The Attorney General is to examine whether the 15-month sentence handed to broadcaster Stuart Hall for sexually abusing young girls was "unduly lenient".

The 83-year-old former It's A Knockout presenter was jailed earlier after admitting indecent assaults on 13 girls.

The attacks spanned three decades and involved children aged as young as nine.

A "small number" of complaints have been made about the sentence, prompting an investigation by the Attorney General's Office which has the power to refer the sentence to the Court of Appeal.

Good .....

[arista]

[Omah]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-22948133

BBC broadcaster Stuart Hall "got off very lightly" with a 15 month jail sentence for sexually abusing girls, a victim support charity has said.

The National Association for People Abused in Childhood (Napac) said the tariff showed his crimes were not taken "seriously enough".

Napac chief executive Peter Saunders said he had "lost count of how many people have said to me in the last 24 hours 'what a lenient sentence'.

"If more people understood the consequences for the victims and the life-long misery that many of them suffer as a result of these crimes, I think most would agree that Stuart Hall has got off very lightly," he said.

"We need to look at sentencing [as] the judge could have given a stiffer sentence. What this is saying is that the judiciary in this case have not taken the crime seriously enough.

"It has to be zero tolerance and the right punishment for the crime."

The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) chief executive Peter Wanless said the sentence was "not a great day for justice".

"Hall will be free within months but the trauma he caused his victims will stay with them a lot longer - possibly for the rest of their lives," he said.

"He has shown total disregard for their feelings, even arrogantly branding them liars.

"Whilst it's commendable that this case was pursued even after such a long passage of time the end result is not a great day for justice or for the victims."