Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

General Chat General discussion. Want to chat about anything not covered in another forum - This is the place!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 18-04-2013, 11:13 PM #1
King Gizzard's Avatar
King Gizzard King Gizzard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 85,682


King Gizzard King Gizzard is offline
Senior Member
King Gizzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 85,682


Default NASA identifies 2 new planets that are suitable for life

http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2...-for-life?lite

Quote:
Super-Earth search: Newfound 'water worlds' could be just right for life

Find out more about the alien super-Earths known as Kepler-62e and Kepler-62f in a video from NASA's Ames Research Center.
By Alan Boyle, Science Editor, NBC News


NASA's Kepler planet-hunting probe has identified two potentially habitable planets only a little bigger than Earth, circling a star that's 1,200 light-years away. The planets could conceivably be covered by a global ocean, and they may well lead the growing list of alien worlds that can host life as we know it.

"These two planets are our best candidates for planets that might be habitable," said Bill Borucki, a space scientist at NASA's Ames Research Center who is the principal investigator for the $600 million Kepler mission.

The two habitable-zone planets, Kepler-62e and Kepler-62f, are part of a five-planet system that lies in the constellation Lyra, within a patch of sky that's been monitored by the Kepler space telescope over the past four years. The Kepler-62 parent star is about two-thirds the size of our own sun and about a fifth as bright. Three of the star's confirmed planets circle the star in orbits so close that they'd be too hot for life. But the e and f planets are considered to lie in a zone where liquid water could exist, a ring of space that's defined as the habitable zone.

Water worlds?
Two members of the Kepler science team say their modeling suggests the two planets could be "water worlds" — with no land in sight.

"These planets are unlike anything in our solar system. They have endless oceans," Lisa Kaltenegger, an astronomer at the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy and the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, said in a news release. "There may be life there, but could it be technology-based like ours?"

The report on the Kepler-62 system was published online on Thursday by the journal Science, and was the focus of a NASA news conference timed to coincide with publication. The water-world analysis, by Kaltenegger and Harvard astronomer Dimitar Sasselov, is contained in a separate paper that has been accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal.

The characterization of the two planets' habitability is based on an analysis of their size, plus what's known about the parent star. The Kepler data can show how wide a planet is, and how quickly it makes its orbit, by analyzing the telltale dips in light as the planet passes over its parent star. But Kepler can't make direct observations of a planet's mass. So, in Kepler-62's case, scientists had to make educated guesses about the planets' mass, composition and whether they had atmospheres.

Kepler-62e is 1.6 times as wide as Earth and orbits its star every 122.4 Earth days. Kepler-62f is 1.4 times Earth's width, with an orbital period of 267.3 Earth days. "It's highly likely they're rocky planets," Borucki told NBC News. "They might be water worlds, but they are so different, we just don't know."

The diagram compares the planets of the inner solar system to Kepler-62, a five-planet system about 1,200 light-years from Earth in the constellation Lyra. The five planets of Kepler-62 orbit a star classified as a K2 dwarf, measuring two-thirds the size of the sun and one-fifth as bright.

What would life be like?
Astrobiologists say the fact that the planets are bigger than Earth wouldn't be an obstacle for life. In fact, some experts argue that a super-Earth is more likely to have life than an Earth-sized planet. "If you and I walked on it, our weight would double," Borucki said. "But my weight has doubled since I was a teenager ... so we could do it."

If the planets had atmospheres like Earth's, Kepler-62e's surface temperature would be 86 degrees Fahrenheit (30 degrees Celsius), while Kepler-62f's temperature would be 19 degrees below zero F (-28 degrees C), Borucki said. "You'd see the sun being substantially larger than our sun, because it's so much closer," he said. "But it'd be darker, like walking around on a cloudy day."

In their research paper, Kaltenegger and Sasselov assume that Kepler-62e has a slightly cloudier atmosphere than Earth's, and that Kepler-62f has a thick carbon-dioxide atmosphere with a strong greenhouse effect. Without a thick atmosphere, Kepler-62f could get chillier than Mars. It might even look more like a Europa-style iceball than a Kevin Costner-style water world.

"Kepler-62e probably has a very cloudy sky, and is warm and humid all the way to the polar regions," Sasselov said. "Kepler-62f would be cooler, but still potentially life-friendly. The good news is, the two would exhibit distinctly different colors and make our search for signatures of life easier on such planets in the near future."

Habitable worlds ahead
Kepler-62e and Kepler-62f aren't the first habitable-zone planets to be identified by the Kepler team, and they won't be the last. A year and a half ago, Kepler-22b came to light as the mission's first potentially habitable planet. It's 2.4 times wider than Earth, which puts it halfway between our planet and Neptune on the size scale. Kepler-47c, unveiled last year, is also a habitable-zone planet — but it's 4.6 times wider than Earth, which makes it Neptune-sized.

This January, the science team discussed the habitability of another candidate planet, then known as KOI 172.02. The existence of that world has now been confirmed under the name Kepler-69c, with a size that's 1.7 times Earth's width. "Today we can announce that this is a bona fide planet," Thomas Barclay, an astronomer at Ames Research Center, said during Thursday's news conference.

Three months ago, Kepler-69c was hailed as potentially the most Earthlike world detected beyond our solar system, but now researchers say Kepler-62e and Kepler-62f could be stronger contenders.

There will be more contenders ahead: Borucki said about four dozen of the more than 2,700 candidate planets being tracked by Kepler lie within their stars' habitable zones, and it takes about a year to confirm each candidate's existence through detailed analysis. "We really wish we were faster," he told NBC News. "I really wish we could knock off one a week."

Boruckin and his colleagues are poring through the oceans of observations coming in from the Kepler telescope, and although the spacecraft has had its problems, he's hoping that the flood of data will continue for years to come.

"When you're born a scientist, they leave out the gene for saying, 'We have enough data,'" Borucki joked.



Borucki, Kaltenegger, Sasselov and Barclay are among 64 authors of the Science paper, "Kepler-62: A Five-Planet System with Planets of 1.4 and 1.6 Earth Radii in the Habitable Zone." Barclay and Borucki are among 31 authors of "A Super-Earth-Sized Planet Orbiting in or near the Habitable Zone around Sun-like Star," published in The Astrophysical Journal.

Alan Boyle is NBCNews.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. To keep up with Cosmic Log as well as NBCNews.com's other stories about science and space, sign up for the Tech & Science newsletter, delivered to your email in-box every weekday. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.
King Gizzard is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-04-2013, 11:24 PM #2
LemonJam's Avatar
LemonJam LemonJam is offline
ZakJam <3~
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Zak's mind <3~
Posts: 18,573

Favourites (more):
BB2023: Zak
BBCanada 9: Victoria


LemonJam LemonJam is offline
ZakJam <3~
LemonJam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Zak's mind <3~
Posts: 18,573

Favourites (more):
BB2023: Zak
BBCanada 9: Victoria


Default

LemonJam is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-04-2013, 11:29 PM #3
Z's Avatar
Z Z is offline
Z
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 23,560


Z Z is offline
Z
Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 23,560


Default

Coooooooooooool
Z is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-04-2013, 11:30 PM #4
Josy's Avatar
Josy Josy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 59,933


Josy Josy is offline
Senior Member
Josy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 59,933


Default

Interesting
Josy is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-04-2013, 11:31 PM #5
Jake.'s Avatar
Jake. Jake. is offline
-
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 35,548


Jake. Jake. is offline
-
Jake.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 35,548


Default

Jake. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-04-2013, 01:57 AM #6
Jords's Avatar
Jords Jords is offline
Focus
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Cambs/Lincs
Posts: 48,859

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Ann Widdecombe
DOI 2018: Kem Cetinay


Jords Jords is offline
Focus
Jords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Cambs/Lincs
Posts: 48,859

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Ann Widdecombe
DOI 2018: Kem Cetinay


Default

ooOoOooooOOoooOOOooo
__________________


Jords is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
identifies, life, nasa, planets, suitable


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts