[sampvt]

Let me explain....US = the viewers....THEM = the shows producers.

So who is wrong. Every year we hear the same old crap from the likes of Emma and even posters on here that the GBP are daft to get rid of the big characters first, ruining the show. The problem is that by the definition of applied logic, the vast majority of the voting public are not going to spend hard earned cash saving a dickhead like Sallie or Wolfy just to keep the ethos of the program in tact.

What the GBP end up doing is vote for the dickhead to be got rid of because THE PRODS LEFT US NO OTHER OPTIONS.

The program, by definition, is a social experiment concerning people from different walks of life pitting their opinions and actions against each other which results in an interesting outcome, usually conflict and bitchiness. This inevitably causes a storm and opinions are divided which make us want to watch even more. ERGO BB IS BORN

IMO the producers have got it badly wrong because they think that they have to fill the house with social outcasts and disgusting wannabees that feed on fights, crap and all kinds of unsociable acts that make the majority of the viewing publics blood boil. Why do they think this is necessary. Take a look at CBB, most of the inmates are sane and respectable people with brains but they still provide us with entertainment due to the fact that the tasks and social interaction will ultimately bring out the best and worst in people whoever they are so WHY THE NEED TO FILL THE HOUSE WITH DICKS. It simply isn't necessary.

So by that token, if the house had fewer dicks, the public would not need to target them and get them out and the program would be more interesting. Bottom line here is simple.....

MAKE THE PRODUCERS DO THEIR JOBS AND INVENT AND CREATE THINGS THAT INVOKE CONFLICT, without having to rely on dickheads like Sallie and Wolfy to make us watch. This is why most of the viewers have switched off, they simply cant stand watching someone shi.t.ting in a freezer, spitting in a garden and acting like a nob for reasons that scream financial gain and future mag deals and fame.

The producers need to realise that they need a think tank made up of a cross section of the public that are more in touch with reality. If they took the time to invite say Me, Chuff, Vicky, Josy, Lucas and Vanessa to their studios for one day, we together might be able to give them a better insight into why the show is failing. I simply cant make a case for why people think that getting rid of scammers is wrong....ITS THE ONLY CHOICE WE HAVE.

[Shaun]

I sometimes think the problem lies with die-hard fans expecting too much of Housemates, or likening them to past Housemates and getting annoyed when things don't progress in the way they'd have imagined. They jump on the noisy and controversial Housemates proclaiming them the saviour of the series only 2 days into it, and get annoyed when they're inevitably kicked out because no one - especially the other housemates - likes them.

[Withano]

tldr

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by Withano

tldr

What does tldr mean

[mizzy25]

Its the housemates that normally nominate. last week 3 of the biggest characters were up, one had to go. Its a shame that they are not all up then maybe we could get rid of the bores ie callum, daley, sophie hazel.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by mizzy25

Its the housemates that normally nominate. last week 3 of the biggest characters were up, one had to go. Its a shame that they are not all up then maybe we could get rid of the bores ie callum, daley, sophie hazel.

This is exactly what I mean....If the prods did their jobs right they could get the bores out first by introducing maybe a points system. They get one point for interesting things like winning an argument, doing a chore, being funny etc etc. That way the 3 lowest point holders loose and the dullards will go up for eviction. The program is set up to mollycuddle the dullards and people with gameplans like Sophie and Daley.

[Gillian-73]

Originally Posted by sampvt

What does tldr mean

I might be wrong but I think tldr means... To long didn't read!

[sampvt]

If that's the case, then why do people feel the need to reply with such indications. Surely there is no need to send such a reply.... strange.

[fingers]

If they were all up the public would still vote to evict the most obnoxious one.

[Gillian-73]

Originally Posted by sampvt

If that's the case, then why do people feel the need to reply with such indications. Surely there is no need to send such a reply.... strange.

I totally agree