[reece(:]

Out of the boresome trio, who will be the best of this awful three?


For me Rachel Rice, atleast she was there the whole 93 Days.

[Joe.]

You forgot Luke A?

[TheManWhoLaughs]

LukeA was duller than any of them - I legitimately struggled to pay attention whenever he was on-screen for more than a few seconds

[Joe.]

Definitely Rachel, at least she challenged Rex and had some great moments!

[cookiemonster]

no Luke A was alright

this question's like saying what's the least worse - concentration camps or the holocaust. both awful

[Macie Lightfoot]

Rachel wasn't even a bore and she's nothing like Cameron or Sam. The obvious answer is Rachel for the best as her win was pure karma and poetic justice, Sam in the middle because alol what is a Sam. And then Cameron's last because he's an awful person.

[Adamw92]

Rachel >>>>>>>>

[cookiemonster]

Originally Posted by troynuncdicit

Rachel wasn't even a bore and she's nothing like Cameron or Sam. The obvious answer is Rachel for the best as her win was pure karma and poetic justice, Sam in the middle because alol what is a Sam. And then Cameron's last because he's an awful person.

Rachel wasn't a bore? did you even watch that series or are you talking about a different Rachel? she was also the biggest fence sitter big brother has ever seen

[reece(:]

Originally Posted by Joe.

You forgot Luke A?

Luke A had many more storylines than those listed.

[reece(:]

Originally Posted by cookiemonster

no Luke A was alright

this question's like saying what's the least worse - concentration camps or the holocaust. both awful

[karezza]

I despise all three. These sort of housemates should not be on Big Brother.

[Nia-96]

Sam

[Vicky.]

Rachel. She wasnt actually THAT bad, and when the final got down to her and Mikey I actually wanted her to win, as I saw no reason for Mikey to win at all besides him being blind. I dislike the automatic advantage that disabled housemates get. Its understandable, but I feel the housemates should be judged on their behaviour in the house, and nothing else.

[Marc]

The winner hasn't even been announced?

[smeagol]

i hate bores . sam would be the worst winner ever no doubt about it
cameron i dont think counts as that whole series was the boring one

[MeMyselfAndI]

I like Rachel & Sam
But Probably Rachel, because she was always involved with the group & was the least boring out of those imo

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Marc

The winner hasn't even been announced?

Does it need to be? Most people know whats happening

[Joe.]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Rachel. She wasnt actually THAT bad, and when the final got down to her and Mikey I actually wanted her to win, as I saw no reason for Mikey to win at all besides him being blind. I dislike the automatic advantage that disabled housemates get. Its understandable, but I feel the housemates should be judged on their behaviour in the house, and nothing else.

This completely



unfortunately this will never be the case, it's the reason Mikey was in the final 2, the reason Steve got so far in BB11, the reason Sam will most likely win in half an hours time, the reason Luke A won last year! It is ridiculous honestly. I hate to say it but the reason Pete won aswell.

[MeMyselfAndI]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Does it need to be? Most people know whats happening

I think most people predicted it on launch night tbh

[LikeABoatOnWater]

Luke A, Anthony and Pete should be on that list.

[Black Dagger]

Rachel wasn't even 'BORING' she's highly underrated on here, she had numerous moments, more than Sam that is for sure.

She challenged the villain of the house in week 1 for starts.

[reece(:]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Rachel. She wasnt actually THAT bad, and when the final got down to her and Mikey I actually wanted her to win, as I saw no reason for Mikey to win at all besides him being blind. I dislike the automatic advantage that disabled housemates get. Its understandable, but I feel the housemates should be judged on their behaviour in the house, and nothing else.

Oh, same definitely. When it got to those two I was praying she'd win then jumped for joy she did. HATED Mikey, awful man. Blind or not.

[MeMyselfAndI]

Originally Posted by LikeABoatOnWater

Luke A, Anthony and Pete should be on that list.

Anthony wasn't boring, but he probably was in terms of BB6, as that season had the biggest characters ever, so he was an underwhelming winner for that season, but in reality he was quite entertaining & has some memorable moments

Luke A was also involved in many arguments, yes Adam & Deana were probably more entertaining in the insiders, but he certianly had more airtime than Scott/Luke S/Ashleigh

Pete again had a lot of airtime & was quirky, he had a fair amount of airtime & he certainly wasn't boring, he was just an obvious winner, much like Sam, Nadia & Luke A.

[Natalie.]

Cameron, didn't watch end of Rachel's series

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by cookiemonster

Rachel wasn't a bore? did you even watch that series or are you talking about a different Rachel? she was also the biggest fence sitter big brother has ever seen

Oh don't even come at me like that when you're the one clearly didn't watch BB9.