[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by the truth

funny how you "choose" one alleged example which is pro feminist yet flied against all thew nationwide evidnce that female head teacher employ more female teachers tha the average....biased ?

What the hell are you going on about? I'm just saying the schools here must be different from normal, based on my personal experience? I'm not disputing 'nationwide evidence' at all:S

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Livia

As the question of Westminster keeps being tossed up... The selection of MPs is a complicated business. Deselecting a sitting MP is not an easy thing to do as the deselection (at the next general election) of Tim Yeo recently has proved, and he hasn't been deselected in favour of a woman, he's been deselected because he's useless.

Only one party - Labour - run women-only shortlists. The Conservatives, for instance do not, despite women Conservative MPs being heavily outnumbered 48 female to 256 male. *

Men are not being discouraged to become teachers, they obviously don't want to join the profession, otherwise, what's stopping them? Blaming women in general, and feminists in particular, is both erroneous and ridiculous.

*
http://www.ukpolitical.info/female-m...parliament.htm

http://www.ukpolitical.info/FemaleMPs.htm

why don't you mention the number of women mps in other parties too? biased? why should women get an easier passage into parliament with female only seats and men be banned from fighting for their own seat? undemocratic and frankly illegal. yet you ignore this? why? biased much? why should the fact women have vaginas allow them any easy less meritocratic undemocratic passage into parliament?

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

What the hell are you going on about? I'm just saying the schools here must be different from normal, based on my personal experience? I'm not disputing 'nationwide evidence' at all:S

yet you choose to ignore it? total bias