[Pete.]

Here is my complaint about Monday's nominations fresh from writing it:

Dear Big Brother Representative,

I am writing this today following Monday or Tuesday's Nominations which resulted in Jasmine Waltz's eviction.

I would like to say that it is very unclear why both Waltz and Luisa Zissman were put up for the public vote even though they only got 3 and 2 votes respectively. As this was a single eviction it is the norm for the housemates with the 2 or more public votes to face the public vote (which would have been Jim and Liz in this instance) or 3 or more should there be a double eviction.

Now I am confused why both Jasmine and Luisa faced the public vote as they were not the housemates with the most nominations vote by a long shot. I am most shocked at why Luisa was put up too as she only received 2 nominations.

I believe Big Brother should be more clear to the viewers about who is being put up and why just like the Channel 4 edition used too (sorry for bringing them up but they did explain it properly).

If the normal and proper way had been followed through Jasmine would not have been evicted following 3 nominations and Jim and Liz would have been following the 8/7 they had.

I believe this should not happen again for the duration of this series and in the future Big Brother series Channel 5 airs.

On the positive side, what a great series it has been. Thank you for making BB great again.

Peter

I think it is fair

[Apple202]

i dont think they'll care

[Black Dagger]

Well no because they've had 3 up since Sam vs Toadie last January so I assume that it's not rocket science to understand why they did it.

[Vicky.]

I remember something similar about the last series..something along the lines of it was anyone who recieved 2 or more noms who was up?

Was never made clear, it was just what FMs deduced from who was up each week

[Cherie]

Can't Big Brother change the rules at any time, and didn't they start the 2 or more nominations once they changed from VTE to VTS in the summer?

[Jarrod]

They announced last series that it was all Housemates with more than two nominations.

[Munchkins]

Its boring with only 2 up it then becomes a simple vote to evict scenario basically
Also evander wouldnt have been up with your reasoning, noone misses that bore
Sorry but Jasmine was entertaining for a bit, then just became a tag along to Luisa and humped Lee
her leaving has done nothing to the house

[Headie]

I think the letters fine but I think we all know by now that it's usually more than 2 nominees (which is good because a Vote to Save with 2 up is a reverse VTE).

If you change the 'normally 2+ are up' to 'normally 3+ are up with a vote to save' then that's fine.

Hopefully they'll clarify the nomination rules soon.

[alex_front2]

C5 won't give 3 sh*ts let alone. Your confusing them with someone who cares. Or C4.

[Matt]

Originally Posted by Jarrod

They announced last series that it was all Housemates with more than two nominations.

That can't be the case - Evander and Jasmine were put up for the first eviction on two nominations exactly, as was Luisa for the second

[Headie]

NO @ 2 people up. It's a reverse vote to evict (refer to bb13 for examples).

TBH why have you wrote all that anyway? All you needed to do was write a letter asking them to make it clear what the nomination rules are instead of complaining about Jasmine getting evicted.

[Pete.]

The main objective of the message was for them to make it clear on the the show why someone has been put up for public vote - like Channel 4 used too. I may have gone off on one but hey.

[billy123]

Have fun with your Automated reply.
As has been said it just looks like a reason to whinge about your favourite been evicted rather than a genuine enquiry.
It wont even be read by anyone.

[Pete.]

Originally Posted by bobnot

Have fun with your Automated reply.
As has been said it just looks like a reason to whinge about your favourite been evicted rather than a genuine enquiry.
It wont even be read by anyone.

Jasmine was not my favourite so failed put down

[jackc1806]

C4/C5 doesn't matter. Same production company

[billy123]

Originally Posted by Petemitch123

Jasmine was not my favourite so failed put down

You consider that a put down
You must be a sensitive soul bless.

[Jezzy]

C5 get these every series. They take more notice of TIBB / DS tbh.

[T*]

Dear Channel Five,
Please stop ****ing with our show and make it how we used to like it.
Sincerely,
Everyone.

(PS, The crowd are a load of twats, do something about this pls)

Done