[waterhog]

Hopkins - can give but can not take ? yes or no poll ? 19.01.15

this is very confusing
the forum reader won't follow
its not at all amusing
more vile then the most horrid swallow.
but i have evidence
its on a plate
its all due to the 24 hour recordings of residence
lets open this poem and debate.
we can all see the damage
its as clear as Alicia's scars
we all no if Alexandra stayed it would have been carnage
he wont have sent Parez to Mars.
i am being diverted
because i want to stick my slander
Mrs Hopkins has been converted
because her "persona" is proving to be propaganda.
Luicia is not a bright spark
there is no sign of yellow
never will she be a go get-er shark
she is more lay ed back then mellow.
Keith is also a moan
his nominations did not convince
he has no back bone
out of him it has been rinsed.
Sundays show was brill
not one bit fake
i did learn Katie Hopkins is loosing her skill
because she can give but can not take.

( everything i have seen Katie Hopkins do is always dictating and advising and she has not stop-ed that in the house, but i feel she is loosing credibility as she does not be able to take any criticism or feel she could be wrong in anyway. she may be putting on a hard face as that's what she does in her career but seeing her on CBB leaves me feeling she is not half as tough as she likes to think she is. infarct there is big weaknesses showing and this is not going to help her profession. or have i got this wrong ? the reply to my question is covered by one rule and going forward my trade mark will eventually be - to reply - please use the "wrath rule".)