[sampvt]

Ken gets one warning then on his second, hes gone

Jeremy didn't get a second chance and hes gone.

Alex walked because he didn't want a second warning.

Perez gets 2 warnings plus he is getting away with murder and he is still there.

Now before we get all the stupidity starting about Helens multiple warnings etc.....This thread is about this series so please stay away if you want to dis it with facts about past issues.

[Jason.]

In all fairness, his warning was a bit stupid.
These "warnings" are going more out of fashioned than the normal nomination process.

[Denver]

Originally Posted by BB6

In all fairness, his warning was a bit stupid.
These "warnings" are going more out of fashioned than the normal nomination process.

So what he said to Calum didnt deserve a warning?

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by adamski94

So what he said to Calum didnt deserve a warning?

Well said

[Jason.]

Originally Posted by adamski94

So what he said to Calum didnt deserve a warning?

Not really.
It was uncalled for. But people have always said shove it up your ass or something along the lines of that, and they never received any warnings.
Also, it wasn't said aggressively.

Personally, I found Cami's aggressive behaviour towards Alicia during the explosive argument worthy of a first and final warning. She didn't get nout, not even a reprimand.

[MojoNixon]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Ken gets one warning then on his second, hes gone

Jeremy didn't get a second chance and hes gone.

Alex walked because he didn't want a second warning.

Perez gets 2 warnings plus he is getting away with murder and he is still there.

Now before we get all the stupidity starting about Helens multiple warnings etc.....This thread is about this series so please stay away if you want to dis it with facts about past issues.

Amen

[Stevep]

What Perez said didn't deserve a warning, i mean come on that's absolutely ridiculous. If anything Calum deserved a warning for 'intimidating behaviour', you don't see Perez behave the same way when Hopkins walks around and calls him every name under the sun.

Do you feel Hopkins should have got a warning for getting personal with Alicia and also calling Perez all sorts? If not why not considering you feel Perez deserved his warning which was not personal as such and essentially a meaningless insult (if you can even call it that).

[rionablue]

Originally Posted by Stevep

What Perez said didn't deserve a warning, i mean come on that's absolutely ridiculous. If anything Calum deserved a warning for 'intimidating behaviour', you don't see Perez behave the same way when Hopkins walks around and calls him every name under the sun.

Do you feel Hopkins should have got a warning for getting personal with Alicia and also calling Perez all sorts? If not why not considering you feel Perez deserved his warning which was not personal as such and essentially a meaningless insult (if you can even call it that).

Perez definitely deserved a warning for such sexual innunendo no matter WHO stared the fight. Ok so a lot of people may say in an argument put it where the sun don't shine or put 'it' up your arse. Not a nice comment but it has been said. Perez took it a step too far telling Calum that he would shove his dick up his ass. I cant see ANYONE defending this if I am honest. It was a really horrible low thing to say

[Stevep]

Originally Posted by rionablue

Perez definitely deserved a warning for such sexual innunendo no matter WHO stared the fight. Ok so a lot of people may say in an argument put it where the sun don't shine or put 'it' up your arse. Not a nice comment but it has been said. Perez took it a step too far telling Calum that he would shove his dick up his ass. I cant see ANYONE defending this if I am honest. It was a really horrible low thing to say

A fair few have to be fair.

Look, i'm not particularly a fan of Perez, he is an irritant, but when you take a step back and look at the situation objectively you'll accomplish in seeing that it was no more than tasteless trash-talk. No more. It was not threatening, it was not personal, it was hot air in retaliation to being ganged on and being called a dick. He was not exactly going to stick his dick up Calum now was he, if he threatened him with violence then that would be another story.

It did not deserve a warning, not imo anyway, if you begin warning HMs for trash-talk then the entire show will instantaneously become less interesting/enjoyable. I have far more of an issue when it becomes personal, like how Hopkins targeted Alicia for being 'thick', without any provocation whatsoever. Or how again Hopkins has alienated the entire house against Perez and then isolates him and harasses him hour upon hour with unpleasant insults.

Some consistency is needed, if you are going to lambaste one HM for doing something then you need to do the same when another HM does likewise. Otherwise it just comes across as childish.

[Jack The Cat]

Originally Posted by Stevep

A fair few have to be fair.

Look, i'm not particularly a fan of Perez, he is an irritant, but when you take a step back and look at the situation objectively you'll accomplish in seeing that it was no more than tasteless trash-talk. No more. It was not threatening, it was not personal, it was hot air in retaliation to being ganged on and being called a dick. He was bit exactly going to stick his dick up Calum now was he, if he threatened him with violence then that would be another story.

It did not deserve a warning, not imo anyway, if you begin warning HMs for trash-talk then the entire show will instantaneously become less interesting/enjoyable. I have far more of an issue when it becomes personal, like how Hopkins targeted Alicia for being 'thick', without any provocation whatsoever. Or how again Hopkins has alienated the entire house against Perez and then isolates him and harnesses him hour upon hour with unpleasant insults.

Some consistency is needed, if you are going to lambaste one HM for doing something then you need to do the same when another HM does likewise. Otherwise it just comes across as childish.

Good post.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by Stevep

A fair few have to be fair.

Look, i'm not particularly a fan of Perez, he is an irritant, but when you take a step back and look at the situation objectively you'll accomplish in seeing that it was no more than tasteless trash-talk. No more. It was not threatening, it was not personal, it was hot air in retaliation to being ganged on and being called a dick. He was not exactly going to stick his dick up Calum now was he, if he threatened him with violence then that would be another story.

It did not deserve a warning, not imo anyway, if you begin warning HMs for trash-talk then the entire show will instantaneously become less interesting/enjoyable. I have far more of an issue when it becomes personal, like how Hopkins targeted Alicia for being 'thick', without any provocation whatsoever. Or how again Hopkins has alienated the entire house against Perez and then isolates him and harasses him hour upon hour with unpleasant insults.

Some consistency is needed, if you are going to lambaste one HM for doing something then you need to do the same when another HM does likewise. Otherwise it just comes across as childish.

I don't know about anyone else but doing that to me, would definitely constitute an act of violence towards me as well as making me walk funny for several weeks so I am leaning towards it being a pretty bad act.

[Stevep]

Originally Posted by sampvt

I don't know about anyone else but doing that to me, would definitely constitute an act of violence towards me as well as making me walk funny for several weeks so I am leaning towards it being a pretty bad act.

Again, as i said, it was trash-talk, hot air, think it was fairly obvious to all that it was by no means a legitimate threat of violence. Well to anyone that is not childish enough to have an unwavering agenda.

[The Penguin]

They will never eject Perez. He is too valuable for ratings. Many people, me included, tune in only to see how he provokes the other housemates.

[dak2v]

They will never evict Perez its in his contract pass to the final plus it is The Perez Show

[wendywillow]

Originally Posted by dak2v

They will never evict Perez its in his contract pass to the final plus it is The Perez Show

exactly, featuring kh

[wendywillow]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Ken gets one warning then on his second, hes gone

Jeremy didn't get a second chance and hes gone.

Alex walked because he didn't want a second warning.

Perez gets 2 warnings plus he is getting away with murder and he is still there.

Now before we get all the stupidity starting about Helens multiple warnings etc.....This thread is about this series so please stay away if you want to dis it with facts about past issues.

I don't think anyone should've been thrown out of bb so far this year, Jeremy was the worse imo cause he actually touched Chloe (albeit drunk) but bb overreacted and they should've let Chloe and the house decide the next day. Perez hasn't done anything worth tossing him for. Call someone a dick theyre going to respond in a nasty manner

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by wendywillow

I don't think anyone should've been thrown out of bb so far this year, Jeremy was the worse imo cause he actually touched Chloe (albeit drunk) but bb overreacted and they should've let Chloe and the house decide the next day. Perez hasn't done anything worth tossing him for. Call someone a dick theyre going to respond in a nasty manner

Call them a dick back,or a twat or a ****.Not threaten to 'shove there dick up there ass' that is ****ed up.

[Jack The Cat]

All warnings are stupid, if they do something illegal kick them out. If not leave them the f### alone.

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Ken gets one warning then on his second, hes gone

Jeremy didn't get a second chance and hes gone.

Alex walked because he didn't want a second warning.

Perez gets 2 warnings plus he is getting away with murder and he is still there.

Now before we get all the stupidity starting about Helens multiple warnings etc.....This thread is about this series so please stay away if you want to dis it with facts about past issues.

Agree.Even if Perez had no warnings that comment should've got him kicked straight out.You can't say that to someone.

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

sam i thought you liked perez?

[Philanthropite]

They only warned him because Calum was ready to knock his lights out.

What Perez said was in no way near as bad as some of the stuff Katie H has been coming out with.

I love how people gloss over her nastiness because she says it in a more comical fashion.

Make no mistake Perez isn't even close to that sort of nastiness.

He comes off as bitchy (when he does rarely get genuinely angry) more than anything, which is what you might expect from a loud gay guy anyway.

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Philanthropite

They only warned him because Calum was ready to knock his lights out.

What Perez said was in no way near as bad as some of the stuff Katie H has been coming out with.

I love how people gloss over her nastiness because she says it in a more comical fashion.

Make no mistake Perez isn't even close to that sort of nastiness.

He comes off as bitchy (when he does rarely get genuinely angry) more than anything, which is what you might expect from a loud gay guy anyway.

No Perez is really nasty just ask Lady Gaga

[Philanthropite]

Originally Posted by adamski94

No Perez is really nasty just ask Lady Gaga

lol weak. If you want to go down that route, it's not like other housemates are saints; especially, Katie H. Just ask Gemma Collins.

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Philanthropite

lol weak. If you want to go down that route, it's not like other housemates are saints; especially, Katie H. Just ask Gemma Collins.

Things is you can argue all you like but Katie as never dome anything as bad as Perez

[Black Dagger]

Originally Posted by adamski94

Things is you can argue all you like but Katie as never dome anything as bad as Perez

Wishing death on a load of Palestinians was lovely...