Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 18-12-2006, 08:33 PM #1
Tanser_Man Tanser_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, West Midlands
Posts: 3,939
Tanser_Man Tanser_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, West Midlands
Posts: 3,939
Default Should we bring back Capital Punishment (Serious Debate)

... the death penalty to improve our society?

Discuss

Now with Britain turning into a haven for criminals and crime, would it be a good thing to reintroduce the death penalty?

I think we should bring the death penalty back in this country immediately, before it’s too late! We're already seeing the youth of today resorting to crime as if it’s a commodity in life, using an ASBO as an achievement, getting pleasure from other people’s misery. Surely you wouldn't want your kids growing up in a lawless society like this?

Having a death sentence would put the gitters up these offenders and make them think twice about breaking the law.

I think it's sad that in this day and age people are too scared to walk down there roads at night, in a country which is supposed to be free from tyranny and oppression. We can get rid of evil dictators but we can’t stop the very people on our doorsteps? Surely we have our priorities wrong?

If you’re in favor, what sort of death sentence would you impose?

Hanging
Lethal Injection
Firing Squad
Electrocution

If not, why should we not and what alternatives do we have?

Surely it would be cheaper to get rid of these vile people then to let them live the polished lives they do now?

There are so many questions and answers I could bring forward but I’d be here all night making this thread, so at least I have got the ball rolling!
Tanser_Man is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 08:36 PM #2
Chrizzle Chrizzle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,629


Chrizzle Chrizzle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,629


Default

Definately no.

I completely disagree with it.
Chrizzle is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 08:37 PM #3
Tanser_Man Tanser_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, West Midlands
Posts: 3,939
Tanser_Man Tanser_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, West Midlands
Posts: 3,939
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Chrizzle
Definately no.

I completely disagree with it.
Why do you disagree?

Tanser_Man is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 08:37 PM #4
Chrizzle Chrizzle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,629


Chrizzle Chrizzle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,629


Default

I'm not sure.

I just think its wrong.
I don't think killing anyone, is the answer!
Chrizzle is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 08:37 PM #5
Lauren's Avatar
Lauren Lauren is offline
van der Woodsen
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Happyland
Posts: 20,107


Lauren Lauren is offline
van der Woodsen
Lauren's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Happyland
Posts: 20,107


Default

I'm all for it.

With jails being crowded up, there is a lot of serious offenders being freed too early and therefore more crimes being committed.
I'm not a complete cold-hearted gal though - I think it should be by lethal injection. (Although I'm tempted to say they should be killed in the same way they killed the victim).
Lauren is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 08:40 PM #6
Pipergun's Avatar
Pipergun Pipergun is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,213
Pipergun Pipergun is offline
Senior Member
Pipergun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,213
Default

Wooah.. I have some pretty strong views on this!

No.. definitely not. I don't believe in an eye for an eye.

Criminals, especially murderers worthy of the death penalty should have to live a life of torment, contemplating what possessed them to do what they did. Living with themselves must be one of the hardest things to do, so make them do it.

Death is too easy for those sort of criminals, it's an easy way out. They deserve a life of suffering for the happy, healthy lives that they've taken away and the families and family legacies that they have forever tainted.
Pipergun is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 08:41 PM #7
Tanser_Man Tanser_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, West Midlands
Posts: 3,939
Tanser_Man Tanser_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, West Midlands
Posts: 3,939
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Chrizzle
I'm not sure.

I just think its wrong.
I don't think killing anyone, is the answer!
I think if the crime justifys death, it should be a possibility.

If someone kills someone, in my eyes they shouldn't have the luxury of a breath nevermind a posh cell for the rest of there lives. What about the poor victim? Do they get the choice of whether they get to live or die?

Tanser_Man is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 08:44 PM #8
Tanser_Man Tanser_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, West Midlands
Posts: 3,939
Tanser_Man Tanser_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, West Midlands
Posts: 3,939
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by LaurenFah
(Although I'm tempted to say they should be killed in the same way they killed the victim).
Tempted!?

That's exactly the way i would personally want it done, at least then they'd feel the pain and suffering (if any) that was caused to the victim.
Tanser_Man is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 08:49 PM #9
Lauren's Avatar
Lauren Lauren is offline
van der Woodsen
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Happyland
Posts: 20,107


Lauren Lauren is offline
van der Woodsen
Lauren's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Happyland
Posts: 20,107


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Tanser_Man
Quote:
Originally posted by LaurenFah
(Although I'm tempted to say they should be killed in the same way they killed the victim).
Tempted!?

That's exactly the way i would personally want it done, at least then they'd feel the pain and suffering (if any) that was caused to the victim.
Ooh go on then. I'll treat myself to a bad thought.
Haha.
Lauren is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 08:51 PM #10
Lauren's Avatar
Lauren Lauren is offline
van der Woodsen
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Happyland
Posts: 20,107


Lauren Lauren is offline
van der Woodsen
Lauren's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Happyland
Posts: 20,107


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Pipergun
Death is too easy for those sort of criminals, it's an easy way out. They deserve a life of suffering for the happy, healthy lives that they've taken away and the families and family legacies that they have forever tainted.
But the thing is - a lot of them don't live a life of suffering. Sociopaths don't even recognise they have done anything wrong. They live in a cushy cell, with Sky TV, internet access etc.

Or they get let free cos there's so many of the scumbags that the sentencing is becoming weak.

Rid the world of them, I say.,
Lauren is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 08:52 PM #11
Chrizzle Chrizzle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,629


Chrizzle Chrizzle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,629


Default

I always say, let them suffer.
Once they are dead, its over. Why would we want that to happen?

Lock them away with a piece of bread everyday, and a glass of water!
A tiny bit of sunlight. yes its torture, but its punishment.
Chrizzle is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 08:53 PM #12
Lauren's Avatar
Lauren Lauren is offline
van der Woodsen
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Happyland
Posts: 20,107


Lauren Lauren is offline
van der Woodsen
Lauren's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Happyland
Posts: 20,107


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Chrizzle
Lock them away with a piece of bread everyday, and a glass of water!
A tiny bit of sunlight. yes its torture, but its punishment.
We don't have enough space in the world to do that. Thats why a lot of murderers/paedos/rapists are being freed early.
Lauren is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 08:57 PM #13
Tanser_Man Tanser_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, West Midlands
Posts: 3,939
Tanser_Man Tanser_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, West Midlands
Posts: 3,939
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Pipergun
Wooah.. I have some pretty strong views on this!

No.. definitely not. I don't believe in an eye for an eye.

Criminals, especially murderers worthy of the death penalty should have to live a life of torment, contemplating what possessed them to do what they did. Living with themselves must be one of the hardest things to do, so make them do it.

Death is too easy for those sort of criminals, it's an easy way out. They deserve a life of suffering for the happy, healthy lives that they've taken away and the families and family legacies that they have forever tainted.
For me, the ends justify the means, at least when it is a guilty party who is punished.

Fundamentally it should be down to the victim/s whether the person lives or dies for there offence. Death should be a plausable option because after all, the offender had the choice in the first place.
Tanser_Man is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 09:00 PM #14
sol's Avatar
sol sol is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,224

Favourites (more):
BB12: Louise
X Factor 2010: Belle Amie
sol sol is offline
Senior Member
sol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,224

Favourites (more):
BB12: Louise
X Factor 2010: Belle Amie
Default

I'm not sure really, it may save the problem with crime or it may not but for now I don't think it's necessary.
sol is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 09:01 PM #15
Tanser_Man Tanser_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, West Midlands
Posts: 3,939
Tanser_Man Tanser_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, West Midlands
Posts: 3,939
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by LaurenFah
Quote:
Originally posted by Chrizzle
Lock them away with a piece of bread everyday, and a glass of water!
A tiny bit of sunlight. yes its torture, but its punishment.
We don't have enough space in the world to do that. Thats why a lot of murderers/paedos/rapists are being freed early.
Not only that but murderers/rapists can plead insanity/exceptional circumstances and they get sent to loony hospitals and within a few years they can be released. My mom works at a looney hospital and these people are allowed to go on day trips.... walk about the ground (which happens to be joined to social club and various kids facilities) and even letting them out to roam the streets.

How is that good for society?
Tanser_Man is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 09:05 PM #16
Lauren's Avatar
Lauren Lauren is offline
van der Woodsen
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Happyland
Posts: 20,107


Lauren Lauren is offline
van der Woodsen
Lauren's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Happyland
Posts: 20,107


Default

Because of the complex law system there's a load of loopholes, and like you mention - one of them being the insanity plea.
Lauren is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 09:24 PM #17
Tanser_Man Tanser_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, West Midlands
Posts: 3,939
Tanser_Man Tanser_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, West Midlands
Posts: 3,939
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by andybigbro
Absolutely No!
Why are you opposed then? your reasons?

Tanser_Man is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 09:30 PM #18
Corkie's Avatar
Corkie Corkie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Glasgow/Newcastle.
Posts: 6,802


Corkie Corkie is offline
Senior Member
Corkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Glasgow/Newcastle.
Posts: 6,802


Default

Like abortion, it is a debated topic. The main problem with the death penalty was the result of executing many innocents, for example Joe Hill who was executed but later was proven innocent.

I personally think that it shouldn’t be allowed for this reason. I know it does make the law seem to be more severe, but put to death isn’t the answer in my opinion. I think it is an inhumane thing to do, and we should follow the commandment “thou shall not kill.” I know a lot of the people up for execution are there for that reason… but does that it make us any better?
Corkie is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 09:31 PM #19
xGemmax's Avatar
xGemmax xGemmax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,188


xGemmax xGemmax is offline
Senior Member
xGemmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,188


Default

I think they should. There are too many scumbags free to walk the streets. A lot of those people dont deserve to live
xGemmax is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 09:32 PM #20
Lauren's Avatar
Lauren Lauren is offline
van der Woodsen
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Happyland
Posts: 20,107


Lauren Lauren is offline
van der Woodsen
Lauren's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Happyland
Posts: 20,107


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by corkie
Like abortion, it is a debated topic. The main problem with the death penalty was the result of executing many innocents, for example Joe Hill who was executed but later was proven innocent.

I personally think that it shouldn’t be allowed for this reason. I know it does make the law seem to be more severe, but put to death isn’t the answer in my opinion. I think it is an inhumane thing to do, and we should follow the commandment “thou shall not kill.” I know a lot of the people up for execution are there for that reason… but does that it make us any better?
With all due respect, Joe Hill happened a LONG time ago. Think of the advances in forensic science since then. It is very rare that someone is convicted of a murder without forensic evidence.
Lauren is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 09:43 PM #21
Corkie's Avatar
Corkie Corkie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Glasgow/Newcastle.
Posts: 6,802


Corkie Corkie is offline
Senior Member
Corkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Glasgow/Newcastle.
Posts: 6,802


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by LaurenFah
Quote:
Originally posted by corkie
Like abortion, it is a debated topic. The main problem with the death penalty was the result of executing many innocents, for example Joe Hill who was executed but later was proven innocent.

I personally think that it shouldn’t be allowed for this reason. I know it does make the law seem to be more severe, but put to death isn’t the answer in my opinion. I think it is an inhumane thing to do, and we should follow the commandment “thou shall not kill.” I know a lot of the people up for execution are there for that reason… but does that it make us any better?
With all due respect, Joe Hill happened a LONG time ago. Think of the advances in forensic science since then. It is very rare that someone is convicted of a murder without forensic evidence.
I know there are a lot of forensic science advantages but I still think they could make a fatal mistake (some how, I’m not an expert on forensic science).... I also think that if they did bring back the death penalty then it would cause havoc….. Riots, marches the government would be in turmoil
Corkie is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 09:47 PM #22
Lauren's Avatar
Lauren Lauren is offline
van der Woodsen
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Happyland
Posts: 20,107


Lauren Lauren is offline
van der Woodsen
Lauren's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Happyland
Posts: 20,107


Default

Corkie - it's rare these days that anyone is convicted WITHOUT forensic evidence that links them to the scene of the crime etc.
And I don't think it would cause much riots, since a study showed that about 80% of the British Public want the death penalty re-established.
Lauren is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 09:50 PM #23
Corkie's Avatar
Corkie Corkie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Glasgow/Newcastle.
Posts: 6,802


Corkie Corkie is offline
Senior Member
Corkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Glasgow/Newcastle.
Posts: 6,802


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by LaurenFah
Corkie - it's rare these days that anyone is convicted WITHOUT forensic evidence that links them to the scene of the crime etc.
And I don't think it would cause much riots, since a study showed that about 80% of the British Public want the death penalty re-established.

Lol there was me trying to be intelligent..... Eh well..... I still think that the death penalty should not be allowed....
Corkie is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 10:06 PM #24
stoney12 stoney12 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,073
stoney12 stoney12 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,073
Default

In cases where it is proven that the murderer is definatley guilty as in Ian Huntley , the yorkshire ripper and many other scumbags then why not have the death penalty as both a fitting punishment and a possible deterent.

Why pay to keep them alive,it seems the only just punishment in my 'umble opinion.

I have swapped and changed opinion on this over the years as it is a radical punishment ,but it is the only real penalty for the people who commit these terrible,life shattering(not just for the victim)crimes.
stoney12 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-12-2006, 11:04 PM #25
Tanser_Man Tanser_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, West Midlands
Posts: 3,939
Tanser_Man Tanser_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, West Midlands
Posts: 3,939
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by stoney12
In cases where it is proven that the murderer is definatley guilty as in Ian Huntley , the yorkshire ripper and many other scumbags then why not have the death penalty as both a fitting punishment and a possible deterent.

Why pay to keep them alive,it seems the only just punishment in my 'umble opinion.

I have swapped and changed opinion on this over the years as it is a radical punishment ,but it is the only real penalty for the people who commit these terrible,life shattering(not just for the victim)crimes.
Amen to that!

Spot on!
Tanser_Man is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
back, bring, capital, debate, punishment, serious


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts