FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
18-12-2006, 08:33 PM | #1 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
... the death penalty to improve our society?
Discuss Now with Britain turning into a haven for criminals and crime, would it be a good thing to reintroduce the death penalty? I think we should bring the death penalty back in this country immediately, before it’s too late! We're already seeing the youth of today resorting to crime as if it’s a commodity in life, using an ASBO as an achievement, getting pleasure from other people’s misery. Surely you wouldn't want your kids growing up in a lawless society like this? Having a death sentence would put the gitters up these offenders and make them think twice about breaking the law. I think it's sad that in this day and age people are too scared to walk down there roads at night, in a country which is supposed to be free from tyranny and oppression. We can get rid of evil dictators but we can’t stop the very people on our doorsteps? Surely we have our priorities wrong? If you’re in favor, what sort of death sentence would you impose? Hanging Lethal Injection Firing Squad Electrocution If not, why should we not and what alternatives do we have? Surely it would be cheaper to get rid of these vile people then to let them live the polished lives they do now? There are so many questions and answers I could bring forward but I’d be here all night making this thread, so at least I have got the ball rolling! |
||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 08:36 PM | #2 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Definately no.
I completely disagree with it. |
||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 08:37 PM | #3 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 08:37 PM | #4 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I'm not sure.
I just think its wrong. I don't think killing anyone, is the answer! |
||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 08:37 PM | #5 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
I'm all for it.
With jails being crowded up, there is a lot of serious offenders being freed too early and therefore more crimes being committed. I'm not a complete cold-hearted gal though - I think it should be by lethal injection. (Although I'm tempted to say they should be killed in the same way they killed the victim). |
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 08:40 PM | #6 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Wooah.. I have some pretty strong views on this!
No.. definitely not. I don't believe in an eye for an eye. Criminals, especially murderers worthy of the death penalty should have to live a life of torment, contemplating what possessed them to do what they did. Living with themselves must be one of the hardest things to do, so make them do it. Death is too easy for those sort of criminals, it's an easy way out. They deserve a life of suffering for the happy, healthy lives that they've taken away and the families and family legacies that they have forever tainted. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 08:41 PM | #7 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
If someone kills someone, in my eyes they shouldn't have the luxury of a breath nevermind a posh cell for the rest of there lives. What about the poor victim? Do they get the choice of whether they get to live or die? |
||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 08:44 PM | #8 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
That's exactly the way i would personally want it done, at least then they'd feel the pain and suffering (if any) that was caused to the victim. |
||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 08:49 PM | #9 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
Quote:
Haha. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 08:51 PM | #10 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
Quote:
Or they get let free cos there's so many of the scumbags that the sentencing is becoming weak. Rid the world of them, I say., |
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 08:52 PM | #11 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I always say, let them suffer.
Once they are dead, its over. Why would we want that to happen? Lock them away with a piece of bread everyday, and a glass of water! A tiny bit of sunlight. yes its torture, but its punishment. |
||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 08:53 PM | #12 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 08:57 PM | #13 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Fundamentally it should be down to the victim/s whether the person lives or dies for there offence. Death should be a plausable option because after all, the offender had the choice in the first place. |
||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 09:00 PM | #14 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I'm not sure really, it may save the problem with crime or it may not but for now I don't think it's necessary.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 09:01 PM | #15 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
How is that good for society? |
||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 09:05 PM | #16 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
Because of the complex law system there's a load of loopholes, and like you mention - one of them being the insanity plea.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 09:24 PM | #17 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 09:30 PM | #18 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Like abortion, it is a debated topic. The main problem with the death penalty was the result of executing many innocents, for example Joe Hill who was executed but later was proven innocent.
I personally think that it shouldn’t be allowed for this reason. I know it does make the law seem to be more severe, but put to death isn’t the answer in my opinion. I think it is an inhumane thing to do, and we should follow the commandment “thou shall not kill.” I know a lot of the people up for execution are there for that reason… but does that it make us any better? |
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 09:31 PM | #19 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I think they should. There are too many scumbags free to walk the streets. A lot of those people dont deserve to live
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 09:32 PM | #20 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 09:43 PM | #21 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 09:47 PM | #22 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
Corkie - it's rare these days that anyone is convicted WITHOUT forensic evidence that links them to the scene of the crime etc.
And I don't think it would cause much riots, since a study showed that about 80% of the British Public want the death penalty re-established. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 09:50 PM | #23 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Lol there was me trying to be intelligent..... Eh well..... I still think that the death penalty should not be allowed.... |
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 10:06 PM | #24 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
In cases where it is proven that the murderer is definatley guilty as in Ian Huntley , the yorkshire ripper and many other scumbags then why not have the death penalty as both a fitting punishment and a possible deterent.
Why pay to keep them alive,it seems the only just punishment in my 'umble opinion. I have swapped and changed opinion on this over the years as it is a radical punishment ,but it is the only real penalty for the people who commit these terrible,life shattering(not just for the victim)crimes. |
||
Reply With Quote |
18-12-2006, 11:04 PM | #25 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Spot on! |
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|