FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Mode: Broken
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
|
||||
Mode: Broken
|
Ultimately it´s just one person that holds all the power, the Veto holder. So no two vetos.
Last edited by Calderyon; 09-04-2015 at 08:44 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
El Cockroach
|
Basically if we vote one option then the veto holder HAS to use the veto
the other option the veto player can keep noms the same, take one person down or take both players down So after all this the twist might be a waste because nominations could just stay the same |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
|
||||
Inactive
|
Ugh, wish they had told us that before I voted!
![]()
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
|
||||
Mokka
|
yeah... think I voted the wrong way now
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||
|
||||
El Cockroach
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
|
||||
Mokka
|
My hope is that whoever wins it won't want to piss off Canada... and they use it regardless of the outcome
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|
|