[Robodog]

OK

So BB has decided that this year's HMs were too boring, they needed culling and the house needed fresh blood to go in there and be energising, controversial and to shake it all up.

Aaron was energising and controversial the other night and look what happened.

Harriet was energising and controversial and that's why people voted her out.

How long before these new HMs get warnings, get removed or voted out for being too controversial?

BB does it's best to stir up drama and confrontation - then when the HMs deliver it - they get warnings, removals or evictions.

Meanwhile everyone complains about the others being too boring.

What a pile of BS it has become.

The solution?

Put 14 adults in there, let them do what they want, intervene only if someone is in danger or breaks the law.

We need to have to vote to SAVE (to keep the exciting HMs in there) and just let the process evolve naturally.

There is too much meddling. Too many cooks spoil the broth.

BB needs to learn to hold back, trust the process and let it ride.

All this quick-fix twisting all the time is sending a message that BB thinks the fans have short term attention spans. It's an insult.

True BB fans like a slow burn natural evolution in the house where you get to know the HMs and watch their journeys over time. Not some shotgun, superficial media circus.

Fans know what we want. BB producers can't seem to make their minds up. Let the fans decide the pace and the nature of the show.