[Withano]

I asked on another thread but it'll get lost in the comments and i really want to know the answer because i don't see the similarities that people have drawn.

Chloe got a little mad at people for spending money which was not theirs to spend.. How is it the same as Chloe choosing to not give money which was hers to give.

Its not the same. I would have done the exact same as Chloe, it was my 5k to give or keep and i would have got a bit miffed at others recklessly buying stupid ****, its not their money to spend.. if somebody could explain why her and i are hypocrites, id be grateful! It was her money to give and she chose not to

[Scream]

Well, you said 'I would have got a bit miffed at others recklessly buying stupid **** its not their money to spend'

If that's her logic, when Jack got the football scores he said she could of done the same and she said 'we're not that selfish!!!!'

She's not that selfish to use 4k, but she's selfish enough to take 5k

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Scream

Well, you said 'I would have got a bit miffed at others recklessly buying stupid **** its not their money to spend'

If that's her logic, when Jack got the football scores he said she could of done the same and she said 'we're not that selfish!!!!'

She's not that selfish to use 4k, but she's selfish enough to take 5k

Its not jacks money to spend, it was chloes money to give. The two examples cant really be compared.

[Scream]

Originally Posted by Withano

Its not jacks money to spend, it was chloes money to give. The two examples cant really be compared.

But Chloe said to Jack that it was bad him taking the money from the prize fund because they all thought Danny would win and therefore they were taking the money from Danny. So her taking that 5K took 5K from Danny's prize fund.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Scream

But Chloe said to Jack that it was bad him taking the money from the prize fund because they all thought Danny would win and therefore they were taking the money from Danny. So her taking that 5K took 5K from Danny's prize fund.

She didnt take from the prizefund, she chose not to contribute the 5k that she basically won. i dont see how its hypocritical because its not the same scenario, i can see how it may be considered immoral, not saying shes in the right.. Its just not hypocritical.

[jyunga]

I don't see how it's hypocritical. If BB offered anyone money for themselves or to put back into the prize fund there is nothing wrong with taking the money. You would be ADDING to the winners fund.

Joel and Jack were TAKING money from the fund, not for themselves but for stupid items they wanted to eat/use in the house. It was a complete waste of money.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by jyunga

I don't see how it's hypocritical. If BB offered anyone money for themselves or to put back into the prize fund there is nothing wrong with taking the money. You would be ADDING to the winners fund.

Joel and Jack were TAKING money from the fund, not for themselves but for stupid items they wanted to eat/use in the house. It was a complete waste of money.

Yes, this was my point. People are slating her (which i guess i can understand, it wasn't the morally 'nice' thing to do but i do feel like it was mostly built up anger and an excuse to lash out at her finally) but hypocritical was he wrong adjective, surely.

[REDCROP]

I really dislike her..always have...and here is my attitude towards ' Little Miss Hit and Run' and her 'World Owes Me Something' attitude.....the prize money started off at 150 grand....by the time Chloe and Sam had finally stopped talking during the cash bomb task, despite BB making it clear it would cost them and despite Harry trying yet again to indicate to them, it had plummeted down to less than 50 grand....between them they managed to lose best part of 100 grand....never once have they acknowledged this or apoagised to anyone for this...and now here she is slicing away at it yet again.
And why was she talking during the task ? She was bitching about the boys being faster then her and how she couldn't get her stealers on the cash button in time to save herself from nomination...yet when Nick did the exact same thing the next day she accused him of putting a price on friendship....and do i even need to mention the way she treated Jack for even thinking about doing the same thing.....SHE IS HANDS DOWN THE BIGGEST HYPOCRITE IN THERE....

[fitz2k2]

she went around the house and told everyone stop talking about the money and yet she takes the money.face it chloe is done friday

[marlobrando2]

Originally Posted by Withano

I asked on another thread but it'll get lost in the comments and i really want to know the answer because i don't see the similarities that people have drawn.

Chloe got a little mad at people for spending money which was not theirs to spend.. How is it the same as Chloe choosing to not give money which was hers to give.

Its not the same. I would have done the exact same as Chloe, it was my 5k to give or keep and i would have got a bit miffed at others recklessly buying stupid ****, its not their money to spend.. if somebody could explain why her and i are hypocrites, id be grateful! It was her money to give and she chose not to

She moaned for Jack and Sam for getting their suitcases for £200 but has the indecency to take 5k for herself.She need to be flogged for that.Get her out.

[ThriceShy]

Chloe is going to leave with about 97% of the eviction vote.

[jennyjuniper]

Originally Posted by Withano

She didnt take from the prizefund, she chose not to contribute the 5k that she basically won. i dont see how its hypocritical because its not the same scenario, i can see how it may be considered immoral, not saying shes in the right.. Its just not hypocritical.

Yes it is. She complained when the others were depleting the prize fund, but by her accepting the 5000, that too was depleting the prize fund.

[Josy]

Chloe got more than a little miffed. She's been a horror all week.

[ItWasJustBanter]

Good riddance to her.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by Withano

I asked on another thread but it'll get lost in the comments and i really want to know the answer because i don't see the similarities that people have drawn.

Chloe got a little mad at people for spending money which was not theirs to spend.. How is it the same as Chloe choosing to not give money which was hers to give.

Its not the same. I would have done the exact same as Chloe, it was my 5k to give or keep and i would have got a bit miffed at others recklessly buying stupid ****, its not their money to spend.. if somebody could explain why her and i are hypocrites, id be grateful! It was her money to give and she chose not to

....hmm, I haven't seen it all/I haven't seen her getting £5000..?..anyways though, just going on what you're saying, I do agree with you that 'hypocrite' wouldn't seem accurate as such but I can still understand why that's being called just because she has been so vocal and judgemental of others..for me I guess there's a difference between 'an offer' from the prize fund which is something that is a treat for any of them right now...I don't know, I just personally think that they never seem to really have 'hardships' in terms of treats...they get so much outside contact anyway, the smokers all seem to have cigarettes, you don't really see them struggling with their basic budgets..?..etc, etc....but with Chloe, to be offered or have taken £5000 as something that was not a treat for her short time left in the house but something that she would and could use outside of the house to me seems not the same thing at all...and only one of them can win what is left of the prize fund and BB mess up that prize fund so much anyway so I think a lot of people would just accept the £5000 and say thank you/I've earned that, type thing....

[Smash the Clique]

Sorry, not up with all the ins and outs of this; if she had said no to the five grand, would it have been added back to the overall prize fund? If it would've been added to the overall prize fund, then she is depleting it for her own benefit, which indeed makes her an utter, utter hypocrite, especially after her lecturing Sam and Jack for spending a measly 200 quid for having the audacity to want their personal belongings back (and this after they had done the bag task for over 11 hours between them, a task she selfishly dropped out of after a few minutes). Can't stand her.

[Amy Jade]

I don't get it either, I feel it's just people grasping onto anything possible slate her.

She took none of the prize fund. She took money offered to her that would have fallen into the prize fund if she refused...good on her for taking the cash!

[Vanessa]

She says they can't be selfish. Has a go at anyone who wastes "Danny's money", then takes 5 grand for herself. GET HER OUT!

[Amy Jade]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

She says they can't be selfish. Has a go at anyone who wastes "Danny's money", then takes 5 grand for herself. GET HER OUT!

It wasn't part of the prize fund yet and you'd justify it if Cristian took it so

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

It wasn't part of the prize fund yet and you'd justify it if Cristian took it so

Cristian is not the one calling people who waste the prize fund money selfish. She gave Joel, Nick and Jack such a hard time about it, then she takes the money herself. Hypocrite. Calls others selfish, but she's no better.

[Miss Nicole]

I love Chloe, they have all made mistakes at some point and it just makes them human, I actually don't think what she did was wrong though.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

I don't get it either, I feel it's just people grasping onto anything possible slate her.

She took none of the prize fund. She took money offered to her that would have fallen into the prize fund if she refused...good on her for taking the cash!

You know the drill, we have a woman frontrunner so it's time to evict her and see The Look On Her Face

[bitontheslide]

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot

You know the drill, we have a woman frontrunner so it's time to evict her and see The Look On Her Face

thats just not true. Anyone that can't see the nasty game that Chloe has been playing this last week has to be wearing rose coloured spectacles

[DemolitionRed]

Was she the only one who took the 5k?

[Papillon]

Chloe & Sam combined lost over 70K of the prize money during the Cashbomb Nom Task.

Through out this week HMs were trying to add money to the pot to raise it for the winner, 1,000 here 2,000 there.

Every time someone spent some of the prize money or in her opinion wasn't playing for the team, she went ape chit.

Chloe didn't even encourage or insisted Jack took the phone call from his Father yesterday even though she knew Jack had £0 in his sack. This really was out of order considering Jack didn't even get his letter from home.

Yes technically the 5K that was offered to Chloe wasn't even part of the cash pot (yet) but it could have been.
Chloe have said through out the series she wasn't in BB for the money "just for the experience". Through out this week Chloe's actions has proven otherwise.
IMO Taking the money smacks hypocrisy.