[arista]

Go ahead Punk.



I am to busy working.



The Home Sec
says its like a Phone Bill record.


Aristas 4 Computers
1. China orders

2.China orders

3.Fox Business & Bloomberg Business

4.TIBB and FoxNews Live Stream


Knock yourself out

[smudgie]

Fill your boots.

Smudgies records:
Tibb
Tesco
Sainsburys
Asda
M&S
Laura Ashley
Bingo
Any other shopping that takes my fancy.

Perhaps they can work out where is the cheapest for my shopping and let me know.

[arista]

Originally Posted by smudgie

Fill your boots.

Smudgies records:
Tibb
Tesco
Sainsburys
Asda
M&S
Laura Ashley
Bingo
Any other shopping that takes my fancy.

Perhaps they can work out where is the cheapest for my shopping and let me know.

It will be Speed Automated
searching


Example are you booking Flights to Turkey
will be Flagged?

[smudgie]

Originally Posted by arista

It will be Speed Automated
searching


Example are you booking Flights to Turkey
will be Flagged?

Aye, there will be no flight to Turkey booked from me, however it isn't a bad idea for the Spooks to know who is booking those flights.

[JoshBB]

They need to stop spying on innocent people. If they have reason to believe an individual poses a risk to themselves or others, then fair enough. But otherwise, they need to mind their own business!

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

They need to stop spying on innocent people. If they have reason to believe an individual poses a risk to themselves or others, then fair enough. But otherwise, they need to mind their own business!

Exactly and I would neither believe or trust a word this Home Secretary says anyway,never known a bigger waste of space than her.

[bots]

they could be selective in who they targeted however, racial profiling is frowned upon so they can't do that.

We haven't had a major terrorist incident in the UK for years, I just don't see why extra snooping is needed. If we get hit by something, then by all means they can review it and vote on it again, but until then, they should moth ball the whole thing.

[AnnieK]

It honestly doesn't bother me one bit. They can't possibly be checking everyone's search history all the time so there may be flags for certain searches which is fine by me if it helps keep people safe. Hoping it discourages some people from illegal activities such as child pornography etc...and obviously grooming / terrorist activities

[Kizzy]

They've been snooping for 10yrs .... so no change really.

[empire]

I don't like this, its an attack on are freedoms and democracy, the government and the intelligence agencies are up to something, it goes far deeper than fighting terrorism, whats next we tell each other to watch are backs.

[Josy]

I couldn't care less.

Nothings private anymore anyway for most when we have whole generations thinking it's the 'in' thing to do plastering every aspect of their lives all over social media and other websites.

[lostalex]

i don't care.

If google is already doing it, why shouldn't the police? at least the police might catch some criminals.

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

They've been snooping for 10yrs .... so no change really.

eggggsactly. and Facebook/google/twitter are already doing it, so why shouldn't the police have the same information? at least the police will do some good with it. google and twitter just use it to make more money.