Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

The Apprentice Discuss the BBC's business reality show, The Apprentice.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-12-2015, 02:35 PM #1
Jason.'s Avatar
Jason. Jason. is offline
-
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 30,222


Jason. Jason. is offline
-
Jason.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 30,222


Default Which of this years candidates should've stayed longer?

Which of this years candidates should've stayed longer / should not have been fired when they were?

For me I'd probably say Aisha, Ruth, and (to a smaller extent) David.

I liked Aisha and I personally think Natalie should've been fired instead of her as she was useless, even in the 3 weeks she outlasted Aisha, she did nothing in future tasks.

Ruth because she's Ruth, no explanation needed. But tbh, she was never going to last long come to think of it. If she was in last years series she probably would've been fired earlier.

David because he was probably one of the better males and I think he shouldn't have been fired over Gary last week, who I felt was more of a contributor to the failure of the task, especially with Nutellagate.

Last edited by Jason.; 03-12-2015 at 02:36 PM.
Jason. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
 

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
candidates, longer, shouldve, stayed, years


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts