[Jack_]

...to save whom I presume are their favourites (or at least three of them in Steph, Jeremy and Tiffany) and they didn't do it

Like why the **** didn't they just flip the noms for no reason at all like they have done in the past and that way we could get rid of some dispensable dullards? Do they actually want people like John, Danniella, Darren and Scotty in the final? okay granted the latter two probably wouldn't go but still...

I don't get their logic, they do all this rigging at other times which is either pointless or good (and I'll commend them when they do it right) but they don't do it when they're presented with an opportunity to save these three? Their lack of consistency is truly baffling

[LukeB]

They are doing the public a favour by getting rid of that ****ty showmance because it's boring and irritating to watch

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by LukeB

They are doing the public a favour by getting rid of that ****ty showmance because it's boring and irritating to watch

Tonight's episode was the best for a while...so...no.

Still doesn't explain their inconsistency

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Tonight's episode was the best for a while...so...no.

Still doesn't explain their inconsistency

Only because of Tiffany. she saved the episode.

and it doesn't explain Tuesdays boring episode though does it? the highlights were focused on them which made the episode unbearable.

[Samm]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Tonight's episode was the best for a while...so...no.

Still doesn't explain their inconsistency

Tonight's episode was one of the worst imo

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by ~Sam~

Tonight's episode was one of the worst imo

It's not often we agree but...yes

[Visage]

Originally Posted by ~Sam~

Tonight's episode was one of the worst imo

Steph kicking off - Tiffany erupting - and a chance to see some of the housemates poo?


That's not good enough for you?

[Visage]

Originally Posted by LukeB

They are doing the public a favour by getting rid of that ****ty showmance because it's boring and irritating to watch

But if that's the case, then why do they keep focusing on them?

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Visage

But if that's the case, then why do they keep focusing on them?

because they are stupid and dumb.

[Dollface]

Originally Posted by LukeB

They are doing the public a favour by getting rid of that ****ty showmance because it's boring and irritating to watch

This

As long as Tiffany doesn't go though

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Dollface

This

As long as Tiffany doesn't go though

Thats why we MUST save Tiff...

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Dollface

This

As long as Tiffany doesn't go though

she always had more votes than Stephanie and Jeremy, Them 2 are always in the danger zone(well Stephanie came top 2 first week) but things have changed since then. but is 24 hours enough time to vote?

[Visage]

Originally Posted by LukeB

she always had more votes than Stephanie and Jeremy, Them 2 are always in the danger zone(well Stephanie came top 2 first week) but things have changed since then. but is 24 hours enough time to vote?

I'm pretty confident Tiffany will beat the votes tomorrow.

[Cherie]

Lol they had already used manipulation, you think Gillian chose the toxic HMs all by herself, or chose the replacements? The right 3 are up, hoping for Jeremy to go and won't be surprised if Sam walks in

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Lol they had already used manipulation, you think Gillian chose the toxic HMs all by herself, or chose the replacements? The right 3 are up, hoping for Jeremy to go and won't be surprised if Sam walks in

That's precisely my point...they're always manipulating, so why not manipulate it to save the people who I presume are their favourites like they usually do? I highly doubt aside from Gemma any of the others are their favourites...

Do they actually want such dullards in the final?

[UserSince2005]

Jeremy adds nothing to the house and looks to be going, so its looking good for the producers.

[Visage]

Originally Posted by Jack_

...to save whom I presume are their favourites (or at least three of them in Steph, Jeremy and Tiffany) and they didn't do it

Like why the **** didn't they just flip the noms for no reason at all like they have done in the past and that way we could get rid of some dispensable dullards? Do they actually want people like John, Danniella, Darren and Scotty in the final? okay granted the latter two probably wouldn't go but still...

I don't get their logic, they do all this rigging at other times which is either pointless or good (and I'll commend them when they do it right) but they don't do it when they're presented with an opportunity to save these three? Their lack of consistency is truly baffling

I don't follow their logic either.

If they want to break up the Steph/Jeremy or get rid of Tiffany, then don't use them as much in the highlights.

Unless Darren, Scotty, John & Daniella are not doing enough to warrant much airtime..

[Jack_]

It's just stupid. Flip the noms, they'll still have money rolling in for Gemma and Scotty, probably Darren too and we could've lost Danniella and/or John

Why would they want dispensable bores in the final? Why would they try and get one of presumably three of their favourites evicted?

[hot2go]

The reaction of three that are up has just proved their airtime value and that BB have made a big mistake

[Visage]

Originally Posted by hot2go

The reaction of three that are up has just proved their airtime value and that BB have made a big mistake

Yes absolutely!