[cfromhx02]

Genuinely not a fan of John or Steph but what I don't get is why John keeps being attacked a very long time after the event for putting Darren up for eviction

and yet Daniela and Gemma put up Steph for eviction just two days after telling her they loved her and cared about her,

so they could be screwin over a mate too and IMO I don't think they'll get criticised for it the same.

Is it true that they just did it for her sake and cause they care although of course with a bit of she is hard to live with

which I get fully.

But really John was doing it for good reasons too so why did he get so much stick for it and still does when they couldn't give any evidence for all his other meddling Gem etc kept talking about and yet Gem and Dan are automatically thought to have done it for good reasons ?

Also Steph is up and down,can be v childish sometimes,

though often other times is a right laugh,she the vast maj of the time bitches to their faces

and doesn't have to run away to do it mainly in DR as Tiff does

and Tiff normally runs way and cries in front of them

so why will more people tonight want to evict Steph than Tiff

or maybe of course it being a mainly female audience and them being disgusted at Steph treating her boyfriend like she has might be reasons too.But for entertainment reasons Steph does what she says doesn't run away normally

or lie that she's a fighter and normally daren't stand up to them so Steph is far more entertaining than Tiff.

Also I thought this a long time ago before someone on BOTS said it,but it could be that her boyfriend and her are in it together

and that Steph is putting on a big act which will come out later

so therefore being good for her acting career and it may be case she's been acting all through

because her boyfriend outside is happily going around promoting himself at nightclubs.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by cfromhx02

Genuinely not a fan of John or Steph but what I don't get is why John keeps being attacked a very long time after the event for putting Darren up for eviction

and yet Daniela and Gemma put up Steph for eviction just two days after telling her they loved her and cared about her,

so they could be screwin over a mate too and IMO I don't think they'll get criticised for it the same.

Is it true that they just did it for her sake and cause they care although of course with a bit of she is hard to live with

which I get fully.

But really John was doing it for good reasons too so why did he get so much stick for it and still does when they couldn't give any evidence for all his other meddling Gem etc kept talking about and yet Gem and Dan are automatically thought to have done it for good reasons ?

Also Steph is up and down,can be v childish sometimes,

though often other times is a right laugh,she the vast maj of the time bitches to their faces

and doesn't have to run away to do it mainly in DR as Tiff does

and Tiff normally runs way and cries in front of them

so why will more people tonight want to evict Steph than Tiff

or maybe of course it being a mainly female audience and them being disgusted at Steph treating her boyfriend like she has might be reasons too.But for entertainment reasons Steph does what she says doesn't run away normally

or lie that she's a fighter and normally daren't stand up to them so Steph is far more entertaining than Tiff.

Also I thought this a long time ago before someone on BOTS said it,but it could be that her boyfriend and her are in it together

and that Steph is putting on a big act which will come out later

so therefore being good for her acting career and it may be case she's been acting all through

because her boyfriend outside is happily going around promoting himself at nightclubs.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by cfromhx02

Genuinely not a fan of John or Steph but what I don't get is why John keeps being attacked a very long time after the event for putting Darren up for eviction

and yet Daniela and Gemma put up Steph for eviction just two days after telling her they loved her and cared about her,

so they could be screwin over a mate too and IMO I don't think they'll get criticised for it the same.

Is it true that they just did it for her sake and cause they care although of course with a bit of she is hard to live with

which I get fully.

But really John was doing it for good reasons too so why did he get so much stick for it and still does when they couldn't give any evidence for all his other meddling Gem etc kept talking about and yet Gem and Dan are automatically thought to have done it for good reasons ?

Also Steph is up and down,can be v childish sometimes,

though often other times is a right laugh,she the vast maj of the time bitches to their faces

and doesn't have to run away to do it mainly in DR as Tiff does

and Tiff normally runs way and cries in front of them

so why will more people tonight want to evict Steph than Tiff

or maybe of course it being a mainly female audience and them being disgusted at Steph treating her boyfriend like she has might be reasons too.But for entertainment reasons Steph does what she says doesn't run away normally

or lie that she's a fighter and normally daren't stand up to them so Steph is far more entertaining than Tiff.

Also I thought this a long time ago before someone on BOTS said it,but it could be that her boyfriend and her are in it together

and that Steph is putting on a big act which will come out later

so therefore being good for her acting career and it may be case she's been acting all through

because her boyfriend outside is happily going around promoting himself at nightclubs.

I like John a lot,the nomination thing is just a stick to beat him with I think,and don't forget he got most of the flack for the Tiffany 'thing' even when other housemates wanted the same as none of them spoke up,they were happy for John to be spokesman,John is a nice guy,he makes mistakes,but his heart is good,people like the fact that John is still what they perceive as a 'villain' as it deflects from their faves faults. It's like Scotty nominating Tiffany a favourite and nothing is said,I'll bet if John had nominated her he'de have been called allsorts.He was the biggest threat in there ,so of course he will be jumped on for every little thing as we cant have anyone taking over the faves can we?

[MrWong]

Steph is involved in the most tedious showmance in the history of BB/CBB.

Steph or Jeremy have to go.

[hot2go]

Sorry Mr Wong, I don't share your point of view on this subject at all...but everything else above i feel so strongly in agreement with ...Steph def has been a face to face girl in there....Tiffany def has run away to hide a lot and often only found a voice in the diary room....and John def has been an honest and strong housemate from day one.