Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 25-02-2016, 03:48 AM #1
Ninastar's Avatar
Ninastar Ninastar is offline
Ninastar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 25,291

Favourites (more):
CBB15: Michelle Visage
X Factor 2014: Fleur East


Ninastar Ninastar is offline
Ninastar
Ninastar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 25,291

Favourites (more):
CBB15: Michelle Visage
X Factor 2014: Fleur East


Default Apple refuse to let FBI into San Bernardino terrorists phone...

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-ap...-idUSKCN0VX2QO

Is it just me who thinks this is ridiculous? This could link the FBI to other terrorists in America who could be a threat to people in surrounding areas... I thought the FBI had the right to look through peoples phones anyway?
__________________
Ninastar is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 03:53 AM #2
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,428

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,428

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Apple are absolutely right to take a stand against this.

Here's the full letter for anyone who hasn't read it yet:

http://www.apple.com/customer-letter/
Jack_ is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 04:09 AM #3
Rob!'s Avatar
Rob! Rob! is offline
No filter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 18,771

Favourites (more):
CBB22: Kirstie Alley
CBB21: Amanda Barrie


Rob! Rob! is offline
No filter
Rob!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 18,771

Favourites (more):
CBB22: Kirstie Alley
CBB21: Amanda Barrie


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
Apple are absolutely right to take a stand against this.

Here's the full letter for anyone who hasn't read it yet:

http://www.apple.com/customer-letter/
Wow

Mind you - can the government say "lol nice, but we're going to make you do it anyway?"
__________________
Rob! is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 04:59 AM #4
kirklancaster's Avatar
kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
kirklancaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


Default

Apple is rotten to the core on this issue. They give me the pip.
__________________
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts". Daniel Patrick Moynihan (1927-2003)
.................................................. ..
Press The Spoiler Button to See All My Songs

kirklancaster is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 05:46 AM #5
jennyjuniper jennyjuniper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 4,050
jennyjuniper jennyjuniper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 4,050
Default

I suppose it's a question of which you value more, privacy or safety? I'll go for safety every time.
jennyjuniper is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 07:06 AM #6
bitontheslide's Avatar
bitontheslide bitontheslide is offline
self-oscillating
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 45,692

Favourites:
BB2023: Noky
BB19: Sian


bitontheslide bitontheslide is offline
self-oscillating
bitontheslide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 45,692

Favourites:
BB2023: Noky
BB19: Sian


Default

The problem that Apple has is that if they built a mechanism that could get round the security of the devices, all their devices are then at risk. Its not something that can apply to only one device. Therefore, the security is then lost on the millions of Apple devices.

I think Apple were correct to say no.
bitontheslide is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 07:22 AM #7
arista's Avatar
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 166,061
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
arista's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 166,061
Default

It should have been
done in secret, not in Public
arista is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 07:35 AM #8
kirklancaster's Avatar
kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
kirklancaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


Default

If Apple have such concerns, then THEY themselves should investigate and collate and pass a report of their full findings over to the security services.

Simple, isn't it?
__________________
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts". Daniel Patrick Moynihan (1927-2003)
.................................................. ..
Press The Spoiler Button to See All My Songs

kirklancaster is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 09:53 AM #9
Tom4784 Tom4784 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,095
Tom4784 Tom4784 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,095
Default

Apple are justified in their response, a tool like that WOULD be abused and it shouldn't exist.

It honestly depresses me how people are so willing to give up their own freedoms when it comes to Terrorism which is ironically what the terrorists want. The FBI is obviously just using this case as an excuse to get their hands on a tool that would allow them to invade anyone's privacy even more so than they do already.
Tom4784 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 09:58 AM #10
Samm Samm is offline
we
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 29,474

Favourites:
BB7: Jayne


Samm Samm is offline
we
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 29,474

Favourites:
BB7: Jayne


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
Apple are absolutely right to take a stand against this.

Here's the full letter for anyone who hasn't read it yet:

http://www.apple.com/customer-letter/
This, the FBI can look through people's phones that's if they can manage to crack an iPhone lock
Samm is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 10:05 AM #11
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,984


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,984


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kirklancaster View Post
If Apple have such concerns, then THEY themselves should investigate and collate and pass a report of their full findings over to the security services.

Simple, isn't it?
But they don't want to create the back door to begin with because it would have consequences beyond this one case.
Marsh. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 11:20 AM #12
bitontheslide's Avatar
bitontheslide bitontheslide is offline
self-oscillating
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 45,692

Favourites:
BB2023: Noky
BB19: Sian


bitontheslide bitontheslide is offline
self-oscillating
bitontheslide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 45,692

Favourites:
BB2023: Noky
BB19: Sian


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kirklancaster View Post
If Apple have such concerns, then THEY themselves should investigate and collate and pass a report of their full findings over to the security services.

Simple, isn't it?
They don't have the methods at the moment to do it, that's why their devices are secure. To change that, they would need to alter their system software to create a back door in it to allow the security to be bypassed. Clearly not something that is sensible to do.
bitontheslide is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 02:01 PM #13
Livia's Avatar
Livia Livia is offline
שטח זה להשכרה
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brasov, Transylvania
Posts: 31,116


Livia Livia is offline
שטח זה להשכרה
Livia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brasov, Transylvania
Posts: 31,116


Default

Not to terrorists, paedophiles, criminals and scumbags of all kinds: Apple will protect you while the security services struggle to protect the rest of us.

Never been more glad to have got rid of my iPhone.
Livia is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 02:54 PM #14
kirklancaster's Avatar
kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
kirklancaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia View Post
Not to terrorists, paedophiles, criminals and scumbags of all kinds: Apple will protect you while the security services struggle to protect the rest of us.

Never been more glad to have got rid of my iPhone.
__________________
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts". Daniel Patrick Moynihan (1927-2003)
.................................................. ..
Press The Spoiler Button to See All My Songs

kirklancaster is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 03:14 PM #15
Tom4784 Tom4784 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,095
Tom4784 Tom4784 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,095
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia View Post
Not to terrorists, paedophiles, criminals and scumbags of all kinds: Apple will protect you while the security services struggle to protect the rest of us.

Never been more glad to have got rid of my iPhone.
It's naive to think that this 'master key' wouldn't be abused. the NSA regularly infringe on people's rights to privacy so why should anyone trust another government agency with a tool that would essentially allow them to hack anyone with an iphone?

It saddens me beyond belief that all it takes is to breath the word 'Terrorists' or 'Peadophiles' and people will be willing to sign their rights away blindly. This master key isn't about stopping terrorism, that's just the excuse to try to convince Apple to create it, governments have been using the terrorist excuse to pull bad **** for years and we let them.
Tom4784 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 03:37 PM #16
Northern Monkey Northern Monkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 13,269

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Ann Widdecombe
BB18: Tom


Northern Monkey Northern Monkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 13,269

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Ann Widdecombe
BB18: Tom


Default

I can understand Apple's decision.They need their customers to know or atleast think that their personal info is safe when stored in their devices.It would damage their product if people thought the NSA/CIA/FBI had access to it(even though they probably do anyway).If Apple are seen to be giving peoples security away then people would stop buying their products.It is more than likely purely a business decision.
Northern Monkey is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 03:43 PM #17
hijaxers hijaxers is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bristol
Posts: 13,564


hijaxers hijaxers is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bristol
Posts: 13,564


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kirklancaster View Post
Apple is rotten to the core on this issue. They give me the pip.
Kirk i've been involved in a similar prob - obv no where near as serious but my neighbour died and family along with myself believe his Thai wife has disposed of his will which i witnessed in Feb last year (he passed in April) she changed all his passwords before we got his phone back from the hosp and we believe there was damming info on the phone , we have been to apple who basically told us to piss off ! consequently we are at about the Ł5,000 mark now with solicitors and we are applying to have the will re constructed and that will be about another Ł5,000 before we are finished ! just to stop this evil cow taking everything. Apple have made things so difficult and very expensive.
hijaxers is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 03:54 PM #18
kirklancaster's Avatar
kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
kirklancaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hijaxers View Post
Kirk i've been involved in a similar prob - obv no where near as serious but my neighbour died and family along with myself believe his Thai wife has disposed of his will which i witnessed in Feb last year (he passed in April) she changed all his passwords before we got his phone back from the hosp and we believe there was damming info on the phone , we have been to apple who basically told us to piss off ! consequently we are at about the Ł5,000 mark now with solicitors and we are applying to have the will re constructed and that will be about another Ł5,000 before we are finished ! just to stop this evil cow taking everything. Apple have made things so difficult and very expensive.
This is disgusting Jax, and surely akin to potential 'aiding and abetting' a crime?

I am sure that allowing a one-off accessing of this phone does not constitute some 'backdoor' threat to Apple's security, and there has to be a way of accessing it.

This company are coming out of all this with definite damage to their reputation in my opinion.

I wish you luck Jax and hope that you nail the devious gold-digging bitch.
__________________
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts". Daniel Patrick Moynihan (1927-2003)
.................................................. ..
Press The Spoiler Button to See All My Songs


Last edited by kirklancaster; 25-02-2016 at 03:55 PM.
kirklancaster is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 03:57 PM #19
kirklancaster's Avatar
kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
kirklancaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. View Post
But they don't want to create the back door to begin with because it would have consequences beyond this one case.
But EVERYONE has to have a back door Marsh - otherwise how can Keith Lemmon get to 'Bang Them In"?
__________________
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts". Daniel Patrick Moynihan (1927-2003)
.................................................. ..
Press The Spoiler Button to See All My Songs

kirklancaster is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 05:53 PM #20
bitontheslide's Avatar
bitontheslide bitontheslide is offline
self-oscillating
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 45,692

Favourites:
BB2023: Noky
BB19: Sian


bitontheslide bitontheslide is offline
self-oscillating
bitontheslide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 45,692

Favourites:
BB2023: Noky
BB19: Sian


Default

and yet people take issue when their details get hacked on line, or get morally upset when voice mail messages are hacked. You can't have it both ways
bitontheslide is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 05:57 PM #21
Mystic Mock's Avatar
Mystic Mock Mystic Mock is offline
Jessica Meuse was robbed.
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: with joeysteele.
Posts: 55,320

Favourites (more):
BBCanada 9: Rohan
Strictly 2020: Bill Bailey


Mystic Mock Mystic Mock is offline
Jessica Meuse was robbed.
Mystic Mock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: with joeysteele.
Posts: 55,320

Favourites (more):
BBCanada 9: Rohan
Strictly 2020: Bill Bailey


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dezzy View Post
Apple are justified in their response, a tool like that WOULD be abused and it shouldn't exist.

It honestly depresses me how people are so willing to give up their own freedoms when it comes to Terrorism which is ironically what the terrorists want. The FBI is obviously just using this case as an excuse to get their hands on a tool that would allow them to invade anyone's privacy even more so than they do already.
Exactly Dezzy, I (like most people) like my stuff to remain private, I don't think that most people want some strangers using a terrorist threat as an excuse to scrummage through their stuff.
__________________


KRO!
Mystic Mock is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 06:00 PM #22
Rob!'s Avatar
Rob! Rob! is offline
No filter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 18,771

Favourites (more):
CBB22: Kirstie Alley
CBB21: Amanda Barrie


Rob! Rob! is offline
No filter
Rob!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 18,771

Favourites (more):
CBB22: Kirstie Alley
CBB21: Amanda Barrie


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jennyjuniper View Post
I suppose it's a question of which you value more, privacy or safety? I'll go for safety every time.
Except that if our privacy is at risk then all safety goes out the window.
__________________
Rob! is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2016, 06:37 PM #23
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,984


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,984


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kirklancaster View Post
But EVERYONE has to have a back door Marsh - otherwise how can Keith Lemmon get to 'Bang Them In"?
You filthy minded heathen.
Marsh. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 22-03-2016, 05:28 PM #24
Livia's Avatar
Livia Livia is offline
שטח זה להשכרה
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brasov, Transylvania
Posts: 31,116


Livia Livia is offline
שטח זה להשכרה
Livia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brasov, Transylvania
Posts: 31,116


Default

"The FBI says it may have found a way to unlock the San Bernardino attacker's iPhone without Apple's assistance.

A court hearing with Apple scheduled for Tuesday has been postponed at the request of the US Justice Department (DOJ), Apple has confirmed.

The DOJ had ordered Apple to help unlock the phone used by San Bernardino gunman Rizwan Farook.

But Apple has continued to fight the order, saying it would set a "dangerous precedent".

Rizwan Farook and his wife killed 14 people in San Bernardino, California, last December before police fatally shot them."


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-35868322

Bad news for Apple and terrorists everywhere.
Livia is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 22-03-2016, 05:55 PM #25
Tom4784 Tom4784 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,095
Tom4784 Tom4784 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,095
Default

Awful news.

It really bothers me how people can side with the FBI in this issue. We're lucky to have the freedoms and privacy we have yet people are willing to give it up for a false sense of security. People take their rights for granted and it's sickening, countless people have died for us to have the freedoms we do, to welcome news like this is to piss on their sacrifice.
Tom4784 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
apple, bernardino, fbi, phone, refuse, san, terrorists


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts