[jet]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Because The Sun shouldn't be publishing this video in the first place? Why should he - a participant in a ****ing reality television show - have to comment on a personal video that nobody but those he shared it with should be witness to? He isn't obligated to and nor should he be, what should be the case is that a national newspaper shouldn't be allowed to publish videos like this and seemingly edit them (in the words of both people depicted in it) to not only drag someone's name through the mud, but have them removed from a programme they're taking part in.

It is beyond belief that anyone can justify that

I'm not justifying it, though I'm glad he got some comeuppance to shrink his big head. I asked why he lied when he knew it was going to be published anyway, and why he didn't say that the tape about to be published by the Sun was edited. That would be the sensible thing to do. Instead he came out with some (as usual) arrogant big - lad crap about a master plan so remarkable BB couldn't stomach it. He wasn't even smart enough to realize how that appeared - that BB must have thought he was crazy enough to want to get him out of there.

[empire]

the truth is that the show bosses, this year, where scraping the barrel, with the people they brought in this year, and its back fired, they must of known, the reputation of not just andrew, but the rest of the housemates,

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

Spank me daddy

[Mokka]

Originally Posted by Ithinkiloveyoutoo

Spank me daddy

my favourite response in this thread

[camertone]

50 shades of grey..

[JayBlaze]

I think Andrew would have beat the **** out of someone in the house especially the way Marco, Chelsea and Jackson carry on like they can fight haha

[wendywillow]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Because The Sun shouldn't be publishing this video in the first place? Why should he - a participant in a ****ing reality television show - have to comment on a personal video that nobody but those he shared it with should be witness to? He isn't obligated to and nor should he be, what should be the case is that a national newspaper shouldn't be allowed to publish videos like this and seemingly edit them (in the words of both people depicted in it) to not only drag someone's name through the mud, but have them removed from a programme they're taking part in.

It is beyond belief that anyone can justify that

[wendywillow]

Originally Posted by JayBlaze

I think Andrew would have beat the **** out of someone in the house especially the way Marco, Chelsea and Jackson carry on like they can fight haha

tht would've been interesting

[_Tom_]

At least 8 of the producers are snakes.

[MarcusMel]

You can read Andrews tweets @cobratate

[VanessaFeltz.]

well they had to make that desicion with the information they had.

I think after all those things we saw it was dangerous for Andrew to be in the house

[Clootie Dumpling]

Originally Posted by _Tom_

At least 8 of the producers are snakes.

[AnnieK]

The girls face in the video is blurred so we don't actually know that the girl who has come forward is the actual girl in the video.

Anyway, I agree with Jacka comments about the Sun, this is quite tame compared to some of the **** they've printed over the years....there is more to this than we've been told by BB I'm sure

[Ammi]

...as well as not being able to be sure if it is the lady who has said that it was consensual, we also don't know if that 'consensual' being said now, is a control that he still has over someone...

[waterhog]

it explains why he has gone. omg.

[LeatherTrumpet]

well there goes my BB career

wtf

2 people having consensual fun is nowt to do with BB



that is ridiculous, what Marco did ON SCREEN is far far worse and dangerous

utterly ridiculous

[LeatherTrumpet]

also she should have been tied to the bed


just a little housekeeping there for Andrew

[Clootie Dumpling]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

also she should have been tied to the bed


just a little housekeeping there for Andrew

Damn! You're right - I knew something didn't look right!

[sampvt]

This is what happens when you fill the house full of Z listers. They are all so fame hungry and weird that their back stories will be full of stupid attention seeking acts of depravity. Natilies agent must be sitting on eggs this morning worrying that one of her clients might leak a video or the 2 pole dancing and botox laden bints in the poor house must be crapping themselves.

None of these people are normal so expect a back story that suits. How can they label this civilian BB, simply nuts.

[Denver]

I cant at the levels people will go to protect their faves this video was not edited as otherwise he would have released the full version by now he is a liar and had it been lets say Marco the same people woukd be waiting oitside the house ready to lynch mob him, Andrew has proved he is scum and i dont know why people protect him and he does come across as someone who would be overprotective and voilent to a girl.

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by Adam.

I cant at the levels people will go to protect their faves this video was not edited as otherwise he would have released the full version by now he is a liar and had it been lets say Marco the same people woukd be waiting oitside the house ready to lynch mob him, Andrew has proved he is scum and i dont know why people protect him and he does come across as someone who would be overprotective and voilent to a girl.

thats not violence its having fun

[hot2go]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

If there is a video of them laughing as Andrew claims he should prove it

Wouldn't matter if there isn't ... What's laughing got to do with it ? ....they're making a fetish video not a clip for Youve Been Framed....BB shud research their housemates better but He's not in the wrong for making it

[Clootie Dumpling]

Originally Posted by hot2go

Wouldn't matter if there isn't ... What's laughing got to do with it ? ....they're making a fetish video not a clip for Youve Been Framed....BB shud research their housemates better but He's not in the wrong for making it

LOL. Actually, there is a short burst of female laughter at the very beginning of the video, which seems to be coming from the 'victim'

[sampvt]

That video seems to be a clumsy attempt by 2 idiots to fulfil some fetish by consensual means and shouldn't be the basis to eject someone from the house, Im simply not buying it.

[LeatherTrumpet]

Its the same as ejecting a housemate for having anal sex between 2 men

Just because its not everyones cup of tea does not mean oh well lets eject him


He surely has a legal case here if that video is all the evidence?