[belle777]

are we saying that only women who are aware of feminist rights are entitled to them ? and the rest can be judged by archaic and ancient good old prejudice ?there are many people who are not aware of many laws , does that preclude them from benefiting from being protect by those laws? Chloe is a product of feminism like it or not. so is feminist porn. women's porn. free choice and democracy always has a flip side.

i am not saying Chloe is a feminist. i said " she is exercising her feminist choice to do so." to suggest only women who are feminists (if there is such thing any more) is a stretch.
women who are not aware of feminism still benefit from it. or i should be accurate and say from past feminism. in a way it is a positive thing. although i am certain to get some interesting come backs on this comment . this thread never meant to be about feminism. i do not discuss feminism any longer as a rule. was just using it to illustrate Chloe has the freedom to do what she likes. as do most women by law.
i, was just pointing at the fact she did not break any law. although that would be an interesting discussion. should breast augmentations and body reconstruction surgery be outlawed ? or should there be a limitation of what size one can have them ?

should people be judged on their appearance was my argument about the Chloe and Saira?