FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
14-03-2007, 03:47 PM | #1 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6448421.stm
what does any body think about this. D&G actually think its a good advertisement.? |
||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 03:50 PM | #2 | |||
|
||||
Iconic Symbolic Historic
|
The fashion industry make me sick. I would go into it but I'd be off topic. The advert is absolutely appalling but what do you expect from the fashion industry. They seem to have a different set of rules to the rest of society and still seem like they're making it up as they go along.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 03:56 PM | #3 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Do you think it glorifies gang rape then?
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 03:59 PM | #4 | |||
|
||||
Iconic Symbolic Historic
|
Why are they holding her down? What's going to happen next? It's all very sleazy.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 04:00 PM | #5 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
There's 1 guy holding her down. The others are voyeurs. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 04:01 PM | #6 | |||
|
||||
Iconic Symbolic Historic
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 04:02 PM | #7 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I agree. I was just correcting your post. lol |
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 04:10 PM | #8 | |||
|
||||
Iconic Symbolic Historic
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 04:11 PM | #9 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 04:16 PM | #10 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 04:32 PM | #11 | |||
|
||||
Iconic Symbolic Historic
|
I'm not getting on my high horse and I don't know what your mean by ' someone like you'. Perhaps you could explain.
I just hate the industry. They seem to have a different set of values from everybody else and this advert confirms that. They promote the size zero woman when we all know how unhealthy that can be for young women. The women may feel they look better as size zero but it's very unhealthy. The thing is, the women are so blinded by the images they see and we men actively encourage it that they end up having little choice than to buy into the designer label culture. I know of women and men who do not own a single piece of non designer clothing but maintain they're not influenced by fashion. It's very subliminal. Back to the topic. I would like to know what was going to happen next in this picture. Perhaps you can tell me. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 04:45 PM | #12 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Regarding the size zero comments, which are off thread, again, but I will retort to them. Whilst there is a gaggle of young models clamouring to get into the fashion industry, because they see it as glamorous and exciting, there will always be fashion houses waiting, ready to pounce, and bastardise them for their own self gratification. Whilst there are willing parties lining up, prepared to go as far as it takes, you will always have a problem. Until people stand up and say "No. Enough is enough". I myself am too a designer label clothes horse. It is just my taste. Nothing wrong with that. Doesn't make you a snob does it? Most people are influenced by fashion. I should know as I work in the industry. And as for what happens next in the pic - how the hell should I know? Some people may view it as gang rape, and some people as a kinky sex game. Get off your soap box Grith. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 05:03 PM | #13 | |||||
|
||||||
Iconic Symbolic Historic
|
Quote:
Quote:
You're right in your last comment but I feel that people are such slaves to the industry that they will never stand up. They're bombarded with images and the designers make their clothes to emphasise the skinny woman. I think plenty of people are saying 'enough is enough' but, as I said right at the beginning, the fashion industry seem to have a different set of rules to everybody else Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 05:05 PM | #14 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 05:08 PM | #15 | |||
|
||||
Iconic Symbolic Historic
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 05:11 PM | #16 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
Quote:
They have women in underwear on them. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 05:16 PM | #17 | |||
|
||||
Iconic Symbolic Historic
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 05:19 PM | #18 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Originally posted by GiRTh
Thank you. I was wondering what you were trying to imply. I'm glad it was nothing. Well now you know. Don't be so bloody sensitive. My comments are off thread but still relevant. We were supposed to be talking about the image in hand. You're right in your last comment but I feel that people are such slaves to the industry that they will never stand up. They're bombarded with images and the designers make their clothes to emphasise the skinny woman. I think plenty of people are saying 'enough is enough' but, as I said right at the beginning, the fashion industry seem to have a different set of rules to everybody else. Bit of a contradiction there. One minute you say people will never stand up, and in the next breath say plenty of people are saying enough is enough. Which is it? Are you confoozed? You're in the industry? What do you do? Are you a sleazy photographer luring young teenage girl into you 'studio'. That is just a pathetic comment and you know it. I ain't even going to reply to that. It doesn't deserve one! I don't think anything nice is about to happen in this picture and whether consenting or not it's an image that does not belong on billboards. That's your interpretation of it. Other people have different opinions. The fact is that shock tactics often work and companies gain publicity which is what they want. Ignore it, and they have lost what they set out to do! It's GiRTh not Grith and you know it. It was a simple typo error, and you know it. Get over it and stop being so picky, like there is some ulterior motive there or something. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 05:19 PM | #19 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 05:25 PM | #20 | |||
|
||||
Iconic Symbolic Historic
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 05:30 PM | #21 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 05:35 PM | #22 | |||
|
||||
Iconic Symbolic Historic
|
Originally posted by BAZG
Originally posted by GiRTh Well now you know. Don't be so bl***y sensitive. not being sensitive but just wanting to know what you meant. Is that OK? We were supposed to be talking about the image in hand. Bit of a contradiction there. One minute you say people will never stand up, and in the next breath say plenty of people are saying enough is enough. Which is it? Are you confoozed? Not really a contradiction. I think there are many girls, and it is predominantly girls, who would like to nosh out but are scared of gaining weight. So they would want to stand up but feel afraid to. You seem to think I've said something other than I've said. Thats your fault not mine. That is just a pathetic comment and you know it. I ain't even going to reply to that. It doesn't deserve one! How do I know you're not a sleazy photographer. I've only got your word to say so. You could be anybody for all I know. Do you have a 'studio'? That's your interpretation of it. Other people have different opinions. The fact is that shock tactics often work and companies gain publicity which is what they want. Ignore it, and they have lost what they set out to do! Is that OK in your book. Why not shoe full pornographic images. You're argument holds no water. Where does it all stop and I'd have thought that someone in the industry would try to be less biased. Please wake up and smell what you're shovelling. It was a simple typo error, and you know it. Get over it and stop being so picky, like there is some ulterior motive there or something. Yeah right bgrayson. You knew that would rile me and it's succeeded. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 07:13 PM | #23 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Erm, I think you need to get a grip Geoff. Nothing to do with who's fault it is here. Read your posts back to yourself before you post them. There was a definite contradiction in your post as I highlighted by "quoting" what you had said. I said I worked in the fashion industry. Why does that make me a "sleazy photographer"? You are just jumping to conclusions. "Studio" indeed. I work in sales if you must know. Happy now? And my opinion may be biased if you want to look at it like that, but it is MY opinion, and I am entitled to it, just as you are to yours. So you don't think shock tactics get publicity? In that case, it is you who needs to wake up! And as for typing your name incorrectly. I did it on purpose did I? I knew it would rile you? And you say you are not sensitive? Could have fooled me. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-03-2007, 07:25 PM | #24 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I do think it's open to interpretations certainly, but plenty of people will see it in one way as opposed to others and in their eyes it's wrong. So for that reason alone the ad being removed is a wise option. I wouldn't say it glorifies gang rape since it's just the one man holding her down, but it's gone one step further than your average billboards degrading women in terms of girls simply posing in their underwear. And to me, that one step is quite a big one, hence the reactions and uproar it's caused. Whilst it may not offend everyone, at this stage it does offend others.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
15-03-2007, 11:09 AM | #25 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Precisely Ice_maiden. I agree. One step further. Just over the borderline. Enough to shock some people, to obtain publicity. It's already achieved it's own goal. Example - when a song is banned, what happens? Answer - it goes straight in the charts at no 1. Nuff said. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|