[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-opt-rule.html

[Jake.]

Cameron acting like he's never had a tactical

[Jordan.]

Another reason to hate kids

[Jack_]

'Victory for the Mail' how nauseating

They'll publish this article and then next on the sidebar will be 'leggy 14 year old looks good in dress as she steps out with her celebrity mum'

****ing ******s

[swinearefine]

they're so off the mark, porn made my childhood 10x better

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Another reason to hate kids

Originally Posted by swinearefine

they're so off the mark, porn made my childhood 10x better

[Jack_]

'The Daily Mail has campaigned hard to make internet search engine filters “default on”. Today they can declare that campaign a success'

David Cameron, Prime Minister

I feel seriously ill. Seriously, who listens and panders to the Daily ****ing Mail of all people?

Perhaps if they actually bothered to make sex ed better instead of the prudish tame mess it is now kids wouldn't be so inclined to turn to watching porn and think that it represents real life.

Oh...and another thing, if a parent doesn't want their child watching porn...then do something about it and protect your own bloody child and monitor their internet access. Better parenting and less government interference kthxbai

[Marc]

I'll just have to go back to masturbating on the bus

[Ryan57]

Parents can block this if need be. Making it out to be a big thing is pathetic.

Victory for The Mail also, eh? How fantastic. Maybe the next step can be to exposing the Royals and what our government really get up to? Or maybe exposing the plans for a New World Order? Y'know, something that needs to be done?

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Jack_

I feel seriously ill. Seriously, who listens and panders to the Daily ****ing Mail of all people?

Perhaps if they actually bothered to make sex ed better instead of the prudish tame mess it is now kids wouldn't be so inclined to turn to watching porn and think that it represents real life.

Oh...and another thing, if a parent doesn't want their child watching porn...then do something about it and protect your own bloody child and monitor their internet access. Better parenting and less government interference kthxbai

The daily mail help the current government whip up hatred of poor people in order to have less resistance to cruel cuts and such. Cameron is in their pocket because of this. IMO.

[Ryan57]

Whatever next I wonder? Websites citing the truth about higher authorities banned?

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Jack_

'Victory for the Mail' how nauseating

They'll publish this article and then next on the sidebar will be 'leggy 14 year old looks good in dress as she steps out with her celebrity mum'

****ing ******s

Just as I thought

They run a campaign like this and then publish articles as vile and as objectifying as this

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...on-stroll.html

'The cropped vest top was just short enough to expose the upper region of her toned stomach'

SHE'S 15 FFS STOP TAKING PICTURES LIKE THIS AND WRITING ARTICLES ABOUT IT

[Glenn.]

I'm packing myself off to an nunnery then.

[Tom4784]

It's pretty ridiculous and unneeded, there's ways to prevent kids from searching for porn that doesn't restrict millions of people's rights to view it.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Scott

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-opt-rule.html

Scott we are talking about illegal porn only


" Statement, Google said: ‘We have a zero tolerance attitude
to child sexual abuse imagery. Whenever we discover it,
we respond quickly to remove and report it."

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz2ZlbDaLaO

[Ryan.]

Disgusting victory for draconian censorship and fans of Orwellian nanny-states if this goes ahead. This isn't about being a dirty man on the internet, its about drawing the line between the government and people's personal lives. The onus should be on good parenting, good sex education and building healthy relationships with both sex and pornography. A wide-flying net like this is a horrible slippery slope.

Today its porn, tomorrow its websites that disagree with the government and their beliefs. Before you know it, its Police and Army raiding your house, burning your books and threatening action on your 'anti-establishment lifestyle'. This is by any measure an attack on civil liberties.

I have no doubt the women's rights campaigners, fussy parents and feminists will paint me as a pervert, paedophile, rape apologist or all the other horrible things under the sun. But this is how it starts people. We are sleepwalking into 1984. The scary thing is that people seem to be calling for it.

/rant over

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by arista

Scott we are talking about illegal porn only

No, its not only illegal porn.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

No, its not only illegal porn.

Yes it is.


Porn is not effected

[Lee.]

Would this stop them from being able to see it on their phones, iPods, tablets etc?

[arista]

Originally Posted by Marc

I'll just have to go back to masturbating on the bus

Make sure Scott is on Bus

[arista]

direct.tv have a adult section you pay once (small fee)only then its Free.
For Example.

[Ryan.]

Originally Posted by Lee.

Would this stop them from being able to see it on their phones, iPods, tablets etc?

Yes. The default filters are applied at the ISP level, so any device connected to your Wi-Fi would be blocked. I don't understand why millions of normal, unmarried people without kids are being forced to ring up and say 'Hey I wanna jerk off to Big Bitches 7, unlock it please'

Opt-out of porn is so much easier, and actually understandable. All this does is demonise sexual thoughts of any type. Its typical Daily-Mail headline winning nanny-state fodder.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by arista

Yes it is.


Porn is not effected

By the end of next year, all 19million UK homes currently connected to the net will be contacted by service providers and told they must say whether family-friendly filters that block all porn sites should be switched on or off.

I know you are desperate to defend the government in everything they do arista, but no need to twist the story

[arista]

Originally Posted by Lee.

Would this stop them from being able to see it on their phones, iPods, tablets etc?

Only when in Cafe
starbucks or Cafe nero etc

[arista]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

I know you are desperate to defend the government in everything they do arista, but no need to twist the story

No I am not.


This is not blocking current users (they just click Yes to Legal porn)
its new computers

I have No Family Filter