FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
16-12-2017, 09:06 PM | #51 | ||
|
|||
-
|
I'm not wound up Kizzy I'm just making myself clear as I thought it might save some time, and you might give up this strange quest to have me believe that my "input isn't required" if I happen to disagree with you. You don't get to say when "my input is and isn't required", I'll post in whichever threads I want to post in, in response to whichever posts I want to respond to. I can see that you're going to cling to it, though, and I guess that's your prerogative but again... I'm not going to change anything about the way I post to appease you.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
16-12-2017, 09:07 PM | #52 | ||
|
|||
-
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
16-12-2017, 10:10 PM | #53 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-12-2017, 10:12 PM | #54 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Is it?... Oh thanks for the explanation....again.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-12-2017, 11:14 PM | #55 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
When I didn't say, or suggest, at all that the accusations are "flimsy". You completely invented that, and yet have the gall to accuse me of misrepresenting posts . |
||
Reply With Quote |
16-12-2017, 11:14 PM | #56 | ||
|
|||
-
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
16-12-2017, 11:15 PM | #57 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-12-2017, 11:19 PM | #58 | ||
|
|||
-
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
16-12-2017, 11:45 PM | #59 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
thanks
__________________
Last edited by Kizzy; 16-12-2017 at 11:46 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-12-2017, 09:41 AM | #60 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Are you genuinely saying that your opinion on this is unquestionable fact and that anyone who dares to disagree with your final decision on this is "derailing the thread"? I really don't know what your point is supposed to be, here. I don't care if it was a rhetorical question; a rhetorical question is one that doesn't require an answer because the answer is obvious. In this case, your rhetorical question is perfectly questionable.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
17-12-2017, 10:00 AM | #61 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Thus is probably down to someone not doing their job properly, he should have been cleared from the off, instead they wasted time and resources and now he will receive a payout
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-12-2017, 12:01 PM | #62 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
Quote:
In this case though it does seem like it wasn't actually rape. But I am unwilling to be naming the person accusing of being a liar without knowing the actual details of the case. The police MUST have thought there was reason to prosecute. Given they tend to disregard rape cases pretty easily. Yes, they should have looked through these messages (and if she really did send 40k messages then I would say she has a mental illness tbh) and they really messed up there. But there must have been some actual reason why they did think it was rape. he said, she said is not good enough to secure a prosecution, unless its a historical case where no actual evidence would be there realistically, which this wasn't. They just don't push ahead with prosecutions with no chance of success.
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by Vicky.; 17-12-2017 at 12:03 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
17-12-2017, 01:21 PM | #63 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
She said she wanted rough sex. How rough is rough? perhaps she was a masochist and had fantasies of bruises and bites. Perhaps she really did want him to hurt her and the thought of that excited them both? If she was roughed up in a consensual or a none consensual act, then she likely still had evidence of bruises when she went to the police. Who would you believe? This could turn out to be a couple of sadomasochists with a long paper trail of past sadomasochistic activity.
__________________
No longer on this site. Last edited by DemolitionRed; 17-12-2017 at 01:23 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-12-2017, 01:29 PM | #64 | |||
|
||||
POW! BLAM!
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-12-2017, 01:33 PM | #65 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Here is your comment in response to my post.
Originally Posted by Christmas treeza View Post The police wouldn't have to withhold evidence to get rape figures up... That would suggest that women are not being raped daily and they are. Rape conviction stats are very low, though, especially in comparison to rape allegation stats... and even in comparison to how often charges go ahead. I was referring specifically to the conviction figures here, yet you misinterpreted my post. My point being you need more evidence to secure a conviction from the CPS not less... You misinterpreted my post to suggest my comment referred to rape allegation stats... therefore you were wrong.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-12-2017, 02:02 PM | #66 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
Quote:
The guy in this was actually on sky news earlier going on about how its common for this to happen, which is pure bull. He said he had been contacted by loads of men telling their stories about how women lied. I am sure he was contacted by a load of rapists feeling sorry for themselves. But to make out this kind of thing is common is seriously ****ed up. I now think, regardless of what actually happened in this case, the guy is an utter arsehole. To go on national news spewing rape myths...shows what kind of person he is. I understand being annoyed/upset by his personal situation. But to pretend this is common when actually a whole 2 men per year actually end up in court with a false accusation (a whole 4 men per year are arrested for false accusations)...well its quite vile tbh.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
17-12-2017, 02:10 PM | #67 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
17-12-2017, 02:23 PM | #68 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
The police make errors, the justice system is flawed innocent men are accused ....and yet multiple women still get raped every single day. It's hard to prove though because there are 'no witnesses'... as if that is the only factor affecting every single one of the 1000s of rape cases annually.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-12-2017, 03:18 PM | #69 | |||
|
||||
POW! BLAM!
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-12-2017, 03:21 PM | #70 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
I'm not saying you personally did. But so many people did immediately leap to that conclusion and seem perfectly happy with HER trial by media when they would usually be totally against it. The OP of this thread is one of such people.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
17-12-2017, 03:27 PM | #71 | |||
|
||||
POW! BLAM!
|
Well sure, anyone who immediately thinks a rape victim is a liar should be ashamed of themselves.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-12-2017, 03:31 PM | #72 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
Quote:
This guy seems to fit both of the above statements. So yes, he can be the victim of a false accusation (though this has not actually been proven...despite many claiming it has. Until she is actually prosecuted, nothing is proven.) and also be a misogynistic wanker. Only the second of those statements is actually proven at the moment though. proven by his own actions and words on the topic.
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by Vicky.; 17-12-2017 at 03:33 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
17-12-2017, 04:51 PM | #73 | |||
|
||||
שטח זה להשכרה
|
The most telling thing about this case for me was that it wasn't even the defence who made a fuss about it. It was the prosecution! They knew that with the new evidence the case was unwinnable. No one here can judge the evidence. It may have stood alone or it may have corroborated other evidence... but whatever, if the prosecution is really pissed off on this man's behalf, that pretty much clears it up for me.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-12-2017, 04:52 PM | #74 | |||
|
||||
שטח זה להשכרה
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-12-2017, 05:10 PM | #75 | |||
|
||||
I Cant Breathe
|
It was confirmed she sent a message to a friend saying it wasnt against her will
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|