FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-01-2018, 12:04 PM | #126 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Up to them imo.They design the cakes.It’s their product. Daft to us but if it’s against their religion then i think it’s wrong to force them into it.That’s religious discrimination. Let the people vote with their wallets and not spend their cash in there anymore. |
||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2018, 12:09 PM | #127 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
Just found the thread about it. Was a Bert and Ernie cake they wanted ( ), with a message about gay marriage
http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru....php?p=7025032 If thats the same one
__________________
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2018, 12:15 PM | #128 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Giving out orders now are we? No, twice you ignored the obvious in your replies to me and kept bleating on about how the DM wasn't selling before I decided it was pointless discussing with you. I even bolded the relevant part and asked why you were ignoring it and you responded with faff. You can't have a debate with someone who blocks out things they don't want to see. I am more than willing to respond to anything, but not with you any more. It's a waste of time. Last edited by jet; 12-01-2018 at 12:50 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2018, 02:29 PM | #129 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
You're just being a hypocrite now and it's fairly obvious that you can't respond to my own arguments which is why you are ignoring them. It's more dignified to admit defeat than it is to take the ball home in a strop. |
||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2018, 03:29 PM | #130 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2018, 09:16 PM | #131 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
I'll argue my points, that's not 'twisting and turning' that's defending my opinions, you're just trying to spin the situation to degrade my argument because you can't argue against it. |
||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2018, 12:25 AM | #132 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
You replied, accusing me of refusing to continue to debate because I didn't want to answer something you asked me or something I couldn't argue against or whatever. That's not true, but it seems you can't accept that. I know its 100% the truth, so that's okay with me. I think we just don't gel at all as debating partners. I like to enjoy a debate to some extent, but I find you too frustrating, and perhaps you feel the same about me. Lets leave it at that, eh? Last edited by jet; 13-01-2018 at 12:49 AM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2018, 01:11 AM | #133 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
I'm going to keep pressing the issue because you are being so evasive about it. Explain why the answer I gave you is apparently invalid, this is a debate so defend yourself. |
||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2018, 02:15 AM | #134 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Does this help: You continuously referred to low sales of the DM as being the reason they stopped making them available on their trains and made no reference at all to the statement about withdrawing them because they didn't agree with the papers views. I wrote several times in response to this: Quote:
Quote:
Now are you going to come back with more stuff or will you have mercy on me. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2018, 02:33 AM | #135 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
What I said was true, figures almost always tell the truth, it's the reasoning that provides the spin and in this case I found the reasoning to be at odds with the figures they presented. If sales were that low then why would they need to defend their decision to axe it by saying that it didn't mesh well with their company's views? When they could have just said 'We're getting rid because it doesn't sell on our trains.' and left it at that. When inconsistencies appear between reasoning and the figures and you have to choose one of them to believe then it's almost always wise to trust the figures themselves because companies can **** themselves over or open themselves up to legal action if they declare that they've sold a false number of a product. To me, the discrepancy is most likely down to poor PR strategy. |
||
Reply With Quote |
15-01-2018, 10:08 AM | #136 | |||
|
||||
.
|
Virgin Trains to resume Daily Mail sales
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-42687568 Richard Branson is saying he didn't know about the decision to stop selling it
__________________
BBCAN: Erica | Will | Veronica | Johnny | Alejandra | Ryan | Paras |
|||
Reply With Quote |
15-01-2018, 10:13 AM | #137 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
15-01-2018, 10:30 AM | #138 | |||
|
||||
Triumph of the Weird
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
15-01-2018, 11:23 AM | #139 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
What a farce.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
15-01-2018, 12:03 PM | #140 | |||
|
||||
You know my methods
|
Common sense at last
A victory for freethinkers everywhere |
|||
Reply With Quote |
15-01-2018, 05:27 PM | #141 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
15-01-2018, 05:34 PM | #142 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
15-01-2018, 05:40 PM | #143 | |||
|
||||
Withano
|
Whiney righty snowflakes ruining everything tbh
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
15-01-2018, 06:53 PM | #144 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
Quote:
I think this has definitely been a PR stunt in this case now tbh. Just to get a bit of attention for Virgin and maybe even to get sales of the mail up as now people will make sure they buy them so that this does not happen again. bravo
__________________
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|