FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-04-2018, 08:43 PM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Shows how successful humans have been in recent years, anyway. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
01-04-2018, 09:09 PM | #2 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Yes James
this is why WW3 is needed soon. As we will run out of food etc, |
|||
Reply With Quote |
01-04-2018, 09:45 PM | #3 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Ahh, the story of how the world ends.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
01-04-2018, 10:34 PM | #4 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Eugenics... That's how the west will control numbers.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
02-04-2018, 06:19 PM | #5 | |||
|
||||
Lion Queen
|
I hope it waits until I'm dead and buried, I don't wanna go through a war, especially if it were nuclear
__________________
Me |
|||
Reply With Quote |
02-04-2018, 06:48 PM | #6 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
As for non-nuclear, if that video is accurate then it wouldn't even help; if you look at the early 20th century, the two world wars didn't cause any meaningful drop at all in population and actually triggered a post-war population boom. there's no stopping us, we're just going to keep multiplying until there's nothing left. Maybe a good virus would do it? But the balancing act required makes that unlikely. Viruses with high mortality rates (like ebola) are too dramatic and so don't spread fast enough and are self limiting. Viruses that do manage to spread globally are fairly low-key and have very low mortality rates and so don't change population growth. What we really need is a virus that doesn't kill... But spreads easily, and makes a large percentage of people infertile. That could work. Last edited by Toy Soldier; 02-04-2018 at 06:49 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|