[Sam]

A change to vote to save in order?

Last year, some of the most entertaining people got kicked out at early stages, like Nikki, everyone moaned saying how annoying she was then people were moaning how boring it was without her, so do you think this year the voting should change to vote to stay instead of vote to evict

I posted this before CBB started in January so it should be interesting to see if people have the same opinion

[Sam]

Though vote to evict was a BB tradition i think it should change

[Lil-Lindz]

I think it should be vote to save, that way the boring people go quickly

[Dan_]

I have been advocating a change to vote to save for a couple of series now, people would never be so keen to vote to save a boring housemate in my mind so it would probably improve things.

[Sam]

Agreed, but the slogan of BB is who goes? you decide, tricky one.0

[Dan_]

We had who stays? you decide, last year.

[Ruth*Star]

It could be Who Stays! You Decide!
Anyways i think it would be better saving hms than evicting them, it gives a positive vibe

[andybigbro]

Who Gpes Sounds Better Though

[Sam]

yeah vote to save would be better

[Lil-Lindz]

Originally posted by andybigbro
Who Gpes Sounds Better Though

yes it might sound better, but is sound really important when you think of the extra number of hours the more entertaining housemates will stay in the house

[Bells]

Vote to stay would be much more ideal, because that way the series can stay entertaining for longer I reckon. A lot of the time, in the heat of the moment perhaps, lots of people vote to evict HMs who are big characters - the love 'em or hate 'em types - and at the end of the day they're the ones who make BB more interesting, so they should stay!

Vote to stay would therefore be better, but I don't know if it'll change, because it's a tradition. I hope the same mistakes aren't made, but we'll see.

[Sam]

Im afraid they will make the same mistake twice and keep vote to evict

[~Kizwiz~]

A vote to save makes somuch more sence. It stops mass voting to get a housemate out.

Its a much fairer way of voting in my opinion

[Sam]

I think vote to evict causes the crowds to boo more actually, the fact that its a vote to evict often makes people hate them more

[Dan_]

Originally posted by Sam
I think vote to evict causes the crowds to boo more actually, the fact that its a vote to evict often makes people hate them more

You also get all the crazy threads on here with hate filled posts about getting certain housemates out when they are up.

[~Kizwiz~]

I agree with you Sam.... it creates more hatred and dislike

[Lil-Lindz]

If it stays as vote to evict you can pretty much guarentee that all the interesting housemates will be voted out first, leaving the quieter more boring housemates
The reason for this is because it is hard to find anything wrong with the boring housemates, after all they dont say or do anything
However with the entertaining housemates it is a love em or hate em sort of thing, take Nikki for example, i loved her but many people found her annoying and that is why she was evicte
Vote to save will mean the more entertaining housemates will stay in for longer

[~Kizwiz~]

Originally posted by Dan_

You also get all the crazy threads on here with hate filled posts about getting certain housemates out when they are up.

Thats also a good point Dan..... I dont agree with hate thrads either. It just spirals out of control and becomes a slagging match

[Sam]

I dont like it when that happens it causes conflit on this forum

[Bells]

Yes, but maybe it's those kinds of emotions BB wants to provoke...

[GhettoSuperstar]

I want to vote to save! Its a brilliant idea!

[Sam]

Yeah, but its exciting isnt it

[crazymuma]

vote to save

[Sam]

[Noel]

i think it should be vote to evict. if it was vote to save, as youve seen in other reality tv shows such as x factor, it means you have to get more votes, if its vote to evict then the person who goes out will genuinely deserve it because so many people have voted them out not in.