[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Alf

Maxine Waters has called on the public to harass members of Trumps administration.

Political protest is allowed and enshrined into the constitution. Trump has called for his supporters to actually physically harm people that don't like him, so there's that...

[arista]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Political protest is allowed and enshrined into the constitution. Trump has called for his supporters to actually physically harm people that don't like him, so there's that...

Yes but that was in March 2016.

This Action
has increased Trump's
polls.

And worse that Restaurant
has lost some trade

Trump is Proud Divider



Ref 11AM :CNN New Day HD Live

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

Yes but that was in March 2016.

This Action
has increased Trump's
polls.

And worse that Restaurant
has lost some trade

Trump is Proud Divider



Ref 11AM :CNN New Day HD Live

I'm sorry, I didn't realise there was a Trump statute of limitations whereby anytime he calls for someone to be harmed, he gets a pass after some time passes. Maxine Walters didn't call for anyone to be harmed, just protested.

I'm sure any trade they have lost will be made up in new customers applauding her stance, but either way it's a private business, if they take actions that they feel are right but they hurt their own profit margins, then that's their choice.

[bitontheslide]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Political protest is allowed and enshrined into the constitution. Trump has called for his supporters to actually physically harm people that don't like him, so there's that...

She went further than requesting political protest though which plays in to Trumps hand

I don't see anything here about the death threats received by workers at restaurants with a similar name ... that to me is news worthy

[arista]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

I'm sorry, I didn't realise there was a Trump statute of limitations whereby anytime he calls for someone to be harmed, he gets a pass after some time passes. Maxine Walters didn't call for anyone to be harmed, just protested.

I'm sure any trade they have lost will be made up in new customers applauding her stance, but either way it's a private business, if they take actions that they feel are right but they hurt their own profit margins, then that's their choice.

Yes but she is getting like Trump
her error.

[arista]

[Donald J. Trump.
Congresswoman Maxine Waters, an extraordinarily low IQ person,
has become, together with Nancy Pelosi, the Face of the Democrat Party.
She has just called for harm to supporters, of which there are many,
of the Make America Great Again movement.
Be careful what you wish for Max!
10:11 AM - 25 Jun 2018 ]

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

Yes but she is getting like Trump
her error.

No she isn't. I love how these big tough conservatives are so proud to have a mean dude in the white house, then as soon as someone does something back to them, they all scream about civility and being victimised.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

If you support the rights of a business to refuse service to someone else, then it's exactly the same.

Hardly the way to do business and likely to lose them a lot of it. Professionals they are not.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Hardly the way to do business and likely to lose them a lot of it. Professionals they are not.

Isn't that what free market conservatism is about? I'd say anyone who owns their own restaurant is a professional, regardless of whether or not I agree/disagree with them politically. So for clarification, do you support a conservatives right not to serve gay people?

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Isn't that what free market conservatism is about? I'd say anyone who owns their own restaurant is a professional, regardless of whether or not I agree/disagree with them politically. So for clarification, do you support a conservatives right not to serve gay people?

Were talking about serving people food so I think it's stupid not to. But if they want to risk losing business more fool them.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Isn't that what free market conservatism is about? I'd say anyone who owns their own restaurant is a professional, regardless of whether or not I agree/disagree with them politically. So for clarification, do you support a conservatives right not to serve gay people?

Do we know that they were conservative? Was the reason they refused to make the cake, because they were conservative?

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Alf

Do we know that they were conservative? Was the reason they refused to make the cake, because they were conservative?

They are conservative Christians.

[arista]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

No she isn't. I love how these big tough conservatives are so proud to have a mean dude in the white house, then as soon as someone does something back to them, they all scream about civility and being victimised.

Its being reported as getting at Trumps level
Debates on CNN HD / D.P BBC2HD/ FoxNewsHD
today

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

Its being reported as getting at Trumps level
Debates on CNN HD / D.P BBC2HD/ FoxNewsHD
today

So what? I wouldn't mind but it's just a false equivalence to say it's at his level. The same guy that suggested 2nd amendment people deal with hillary clinton? Is this the same level we're talking about?

[arista]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

So what? I wouldn't mind but it's just a false equivalence to say it's at his level. The same guy that suggested 2nd amendment people deal with hillary clinton? Is this the same level we're talking about?

No Corrupt H.Clinton was
a LEGIT target during the Election.
Backtracking serves no purpose,
Trump moves on , fast,
thats the way he is.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

No Corrupt H.Clinton was
a LEGIT target during the Election.
Backtracking serves no purpose,
Trump moves on , fast,
thats the way he is.

She wasn't even corrupt. The republicans spent most of Obama's 2nd term indulging in false investigations into her; when do we say enough is enough with the lies and BS? I don't even like her, but this it's just ridiculous how much people believe something just because they are being spoon fed.

Even if she was the most corrupt politician in the history of the US, you still don't suggest that 2nd amendment people deal with her.

[arista]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

She wasn't even corrupt. The republicans spent most of Obama's 2nd term indulging in false investigations into her; when do we say enough is enough with the lies and BS? I don't even like her, but this it's just ridiculous how much people believe something just because they are being spoon fed.

Even if she was the most corrupt politician in the history of the US, you still don't suggest that 2nd amendment people deal with her.

The FBI
said her Emails were out of order.


And they were stupid putting her up for Election
As if they Elected her
as her Corrupt Sex offender Man Husband
Former President would be back.


H.Clinton never went to Jail
so she is lucky

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

The FBI
said her Emails were out of order.


And they were stupid putting her up for Election
As if they Elected her
as her Corrupt Sex offender Man Husband
Former President would be back.


H.Clinton never went to Jail
so she is lucky

They said she shouldn't have used her own email address for work business. Jared Kushner was also found out to be using his personal email for the same thing a few months ago. Colin POwell also used to use his own email address for work business too.

That's not corruption though Arista, it's just bad practice. That's it, is that the height of her corruption?

She was up for election, not her husband. Why would her husband's past sexual issues be an issue but Trumps open and admitted sexual assault were not? Double standards being spoon fed to you in the form of talking points by people taking you for an idiot

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

They said she shouldn't have used her own email address for work business. Jared Kushner was also found out to be using his personal email for the same thing a few months ago. Colin POwell also used to use his own email address for work business too.

That's not corruption though Arista, it's just bad practice. That's it, is that the height of her corruption?

She was up for election, not her husband. Why would her husband's past sexual issues be an issue but Trumps open and admitted sexual assault were not? Double standards being spoon fed to you in the form of talking points by people taking you for an idiot

what open and admitted sexual assaults?

[Tom4784]

It's hilarious how the Trump administration and his supporters are responding to this and how hypocritical it is. A precedent has been set that companies can discriminate against gay people by using their religion as an excuse (A weak excuse, by the way, if someone defies testaments against eating shellfish and wearing multiple kinds of materials at once but adheres to passages saying that homsexuality is a sin that it's their choice to follow those passages and not disregard them like they do the rest.) so no one can complain if this twat gets thrown out of a restaurant because she's the spokesperson for the worst president the US has ever seen

If you're okay with people rejecting custom from gay people then you cannot object to this without being a massive hypocrite.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

what open and admitted sexual assaults?

Going up to people and kissing and/or grabbing them by the pussy is sexual assault.

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Going up to people and kissing and/or grabbing them by the pussy is sexual assault.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

It's hilarious how the Trump administration and his supporters are responding to this and how hypocritical it is. A precedent has been set that companies can discriminate against gay people by using their religion as an excuse (A weak excuse, by the way, if someone defies testaments against eating shellfish and wearing multiple kinds of materials at once but adheres to passages saying that homsexuality is a sin that it's their choice to follow those passages and not disregard them like they do the rest.) so no one can complain if this twat gets thrown out of a restaurant because she's the spokesperson for the worst president the US has ever seen

If you're okay with people rejecting custom from gay people then you cannot object to this without being a massive hypocrite.

The cake business doesn't sell gay wedding cakes. This woman was ejected from a restaurant because of her job.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

What's your issue?

[Alf]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Going up to people and kissing and/or grabbing them by the pussy is sexual assault.

But talking about it with the lads isn't.