[Jake.]

Very happy I must say. Was so sick of having 4+ people up every week

[Josy]

Yep its better

[Headie]

Head to heads are boring and predictable. Why are they adored so much???

I doubt we'll have one surprising eviction this series.

[Black Dagger]

Head to heads suck.

[Jake.]

Far more tense actually!

[JoshBB]

People love to complain lol. It's so nice to have the format back

& im genuinely surprised it exceeded the first week. must be a record for c5

[AProducer'sWetDream]

They're so much more tense and unpredictable! I much prefer head to head evictions. Plus it adds an extra element of game playing to the house as housemates actually fear being nominated.

[Pete.]

Amazing

[Jack_]

Head to heads are series ruining and have always been SO overrated, and they're even worse under vote to save

Everything else about this series is perfect but the rule should be 2 noms and you're up

[armand.kay]

Such a better viewing experience for me. Nominations are actually interesting because theres still hope for your fave being saved from. Also evictions don't even stand out when half the house is up.

[JoshBB]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Head to heads are series ruining and have always been SO overrated, and they're even worse under vote to save

Everything else about this series is perfect but the rule should be 2 noms and you're up

We'd be having 5-6 housemates up every week under that rule, nty. I like that the current rule allows a minimum of 2 but the possibility for more if there is no house consensus.

[Oaker]

It's great

[Greg!]

It's such a bloody scream that after years of moaning about the messy nominations rules, when they are made back to normal people are fumed about it

[JoshBB]

Originally Posted by Greg!

It's such a bloody scream that after years of moaning about the messy nominations rules, when they are made back to normal people seen fumed about it

forreal omg. Some people won't be happy until the show is cancelled forever

[Pete.]

Originally Posted by Hayden

Head to heads are boring and predictable. Why are they adored so much???

I doubt we'll have one surprising eviction this series.

I think for me it’s more the fact that it stops someone getting only 2 noms going over someone with like 7 noms it makes the nominations themselves actually count

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by AProducer'sWetDream

They're so much more tense and unpredictable! I much prefer head to head evictions. Plus it adds an extra element of game playing to the house as housemates actually fear being nominated.

Agree, it was a guarantee half the house would be up before so trying to scheme / gameplay was pointless.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Greg!

It's such a bloody scream that after years of moaning about the messy nominations rules, when they are made back to normal people seen fumed about it

Originally Posted by JoshBB

forreal omg. Some people won't be happy until the show is cancelled forever

.

[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Head to heads are series ruining and have always been SO overrated, and they're even worse under vote to save

Everything else about this series is perfect but the rule should be 2 noms and you're up

But the majority of seasons with head to head's are either good or brilliant. While the majority of c5's anyone with a nomination is up have been bloody awful.

[Denver]

So you all cry for back to basics then want one of the mos fundamental parts removed

[BBDodge]

It effectively cancels out the awful Vote to Save rubbish.

Want to evict Chloe - just dial Hardeep's number (and vice versa).

[JoshBB]

It's funny as well because the criticism before was that this would lead to housemates who do nothing being able to float to the final.. yet Chloe's up proabbly for that reason lmfao

[armand.kay]

Imagine any of the golden seasons with the crappy 2 noms and you're up rule. Now that would've ruined the series.

[Headie]

Originally Posted by AProducer'sWetDream

They're so much more tense and unpredictable! I much prefer head to head evictions. Plus it adds an extra element of game playing to the house as housemates actually fear being nominated.

So it encourages less arguments and disagreements so they avoid being nominated? How great

[JoshBB]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

Imagine any of the golden seasons with the crappy 2 noms and you're up rule. Now that would've ruined the series.

SO many entertaining housemates would be easily bootable under that rule, especially with VTE.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

We'd be having 5-6 housemates up every week under that rule, nty. I like that the current rule allows a minimum of 2 but the possibility for more if there is no house consensus.

Good! All head to heads do under VTS is render it pointless and make it a reverse vote to evict, meaning the biggest character goes every time

With 4+ people up and VTS, the non-entities go 80% of the time and therefore the series isn't damaged week upon week! I'll take that thanks

Originally Posted by Greg!

It's such a bloody scream that after years of moaning about the messy nominations rules, when they are made back to normal people seen fumed about it

Not moi! I've even said normal noms are overrated themselves before

Never ever been interested in head to heads