FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
It is indeed a sad day for the english language, as "wag" has now been recognised as an official word (along with muffin top which I had never heard before today when I read the Guardian at lunch! Great word, lol)
http://books.guardian.co.uk/news/art...rc=rss&feed=10 But I have a problem with the word wag. It stands for Wives and Girlfriends and seems to have risen most prominently during the last World Cup. But is is fundamentally flawed!! A person cannot be both a wife and girlfriend (well not to the same footballer anyway!) so surely the term should be "wife or girlfriend". Only problem is the acronym of that is a word that for a long time had some pretty negative racial connotations but at least it would be grammatically correct! If I was more anal retentive, I think I would have to just email Collins Dictionary to let them know..... ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
![]() (thats all I can say really) |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
Iconic Symbolic Historic
|
What on Gods green earth is going on?
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
|
||||
Team Flack
|
Haha I think thats brillant! I was actually talking about this with someone the other day and wondering why it wasn't there!
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|
|