[reece(:]

Katie Price has shared a video of her son Harvey taking a swipe at Piers Morgan’s “s*** banter”.

The 16-year-old mocked the Good Morning Britain presenter as he enjoyed a facial ahead of his appearance on the ITV show on Monday.

Speaking in the video, Katie asked her son if he had anything to say to Morgan, to which he replied: “Hi Piers, you s*** banter. What do you reckon?”

Katie said she thinks he is a “lovely man,” a suggestion Harvey branded “bonkers”.

She shared the funny clip on Instagram, telling her 1.9 million followers she was pleased her son didn’t drop the C-bomb. Harvey previously used the term live on Loose Women while discussing online bullies.

Katie captioned the clip: “Harvey so funny while he had his regular facial @lastudio1 watch out @thepiersmorgan Harvey @mrharveyprice can’t wait for your banter Monday morning at least he didn’t say that WORD.”

The former glamour model came under fire recently for sharing funny pictures and videos of her disabled son who suffers from Prader–Willi syndrome and is blind and autistic.

Fans begged her to stop sharing content, claiming it attracts trolls who inundate the posts with negative comments.

The former Loose Women host appeared in court on Monday where she was cleared of drink driving, but found guilty of being drunk in charge of a motor vehicle. Celebrating the end of the ordeal, Katie took Harvey, 17, to a swimming lesson after school on Tuesday and it’s safe to say, he had the time of his life.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Instagram (@instagram) on Feb 3, 2020 at 9:42am PST

https://metro.co.uk/2019/02/27/katie...8/?ito=cbshare

https://www.standard.co.uk/showbiz/c...-a4079891.html

Why is she filming this

[Jessica.]

I think he's adorable but she shouldn't be putting so much of him on the internet and TV

[Alf]

"His regular facial"

I don't like the sound of that

[Toy Soldier]

Speaking in the video, Katie asked her son if he had anything to say to Morgan, to which he replied: “Hi Piers, you s*** banter. What do you reckon?”

Katie said she thinks he is a “lovely man,” a suggestion Harvey branded “bonkers”.

Not Katie Price being schooled by Harvey on fundamental truths of British telly.

[rusticgal]

So it’s ok for Katie Pryce to plaster her son all over social media slating somebody in the public eye..but it’s not ok for people to slate her son who she constatantly exposes on social media.
Am I missing something?

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

So it’s ok for Katie Pryce to plaster her son all over social media slating somebody in the public eye..but it’s not ok for people to slate her son who she constatantly exposes on social media.
Am I missing something?

[Marsh.]

Tesco Mum of the Year award sorted!

[Liam-]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

So it’s ok for Katie Pryce to plaster her son all over social media slating somebody in the public eye..but it’s not ok for people to slate her son who she constatantly exposes on social media.
Am I missing something?

The difference being is Harvey is an innocent kid with a severe learning disability that just says it how he sees it and Piers Morgan is a grown man who can defend himself and has a sense of humour, whereas the people who attack Harvey online are barbaric, cowardly trolls trolling someone who can’t defend themselves because they think it makes them funny or ‘edgy’.

That might be what you’re missing.

[Matthew.]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

So it’s ok for Katie Pryce to plaster her son all over social media slating somebody in the public eye..but it’s not ok for people to slate her son who she constatantly exposes on social media.
Am I missing something?

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

There’s a difference between saying an adult has “**** banter” and bullying a disabled child because of their disability? I didn’t think that would need explaining but hey ho

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Matthew.

There’s a difference between saying an adult has “**** banter” and bullying a disabled child because of their disability? I didn’t think that would need explaining but hey ho

Pretty much this. He is only slating his banter fgs which is harmless and not even nasty which is so different to what Harvey gets which is vile.

[montblanc]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

So it’s ok for Katie Pryce to plaster her son all over social media slating somebody in the public eye..but it’s not ok for people to slate her son who she constatantly exposes on social media.
Am I missing something?

are you serious

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

So it’s ok for Katie Pryce to plaster her son all over social media slating somebody in the public eye..but it’s not ok for people to slate her son who she constatantly exposes on social media.
Am I missing something?

Erm, I don't understand this point? Its not the kids fault his mother is an attention seeking twat, and there should really not be people 'slating' her son because she did this. Why would anyone want to slag off a disabled child anyway?

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Matthew.

There’s a difference between saying an adult has “**** banter” and bullying a disabled child because of their disability? I didn’t think that would need explaining but hey ho

The morality is the same.
I knew someone would come back with the ‘it’s not right to do it to him because he is disabled’...this disabled boy directs the word ‘cunt’ at people...now he is calling Out Piers Morgan in his delightful vocabulary.
Yes Piers can defend himself...so what?...does that really make any difference? Sounds like Harvey is just as capable of dragging people down..led on by his vile mother.
Katie Pryce is a massive hypocrite...she constantly exposes Harvey on social media and then uses the publicity to create more publicity for herself...quick to critisise anyone who calls her son names but encourages him to do just that..she’s vile.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by montblanc

are you serious

Yes I am....but Katie Pryce is completely responsible.

[montblanc]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

The morality is the same.
I knew someone would come back with the ‘it’s not right to do it to him because he is disabled’...this disabled boy directs the word ‘cunt’ at people...now he is calling Out Piers Morgan in his delightful vocabulary.
Yes Piers can defend himself...so what?...does that really make any difference? Sounds like Harvey is just as capable of dragging people down..led on by his vile mother.
Katie Pryce is a massive hypocrite...she constantly exposes Harvey on social media and then uses the publicity to create more publicity for herself...quick to critisise anyone who calls her son names but encourages him to do just that..she’s vile.

surely you can't hold Harvey up to the same standards as someone without any mental disabilities

your whole argument is just problematic

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Erm, I don't understand this point? Its not the kids fault his mother is an attention seeking twat, and there should really not be people 'slating' her son because she did this. Why would anyone want to slag off a disabled child anyway?

Why should anyone want to slag off ANYONE on social media...disabled OR not?

The hypocrisy of Katie Pryce...

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Yes I am....but Katie Pryce is completely responsible.

Exactly. She is responsible.

Not Harvey. Therefore the attacks on Harvey and his disability are not justified.

[Tony Montana]

Originally Posted by Jessica.

I think he's adorable but she shouldn't be putting so much of him on the internet and TV

I mean, that's pretty much how she's able to stay 'relevant'

If it's not who's her next shagging partner, it's flaunting her kids to the press and being ''Slammed'' for her bad parenting

[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

So it’s ok for Katie Pryce to plaster her son all over social media slating somebody in the public eye..but it’s not ok for people to slate her son who she constatantly exposes on social media.
Am I missing something?

omg are you comparing harry saying Piers has **** banter to internet trolls ripping into a disabled child

[armand.kay]

i have to laugh because like huh??

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by montblanc

surely you can't hold Harvey up to the same standards as someone without any mental disabilities

your whole argument is just problematic

Listen...it’s Katie Pryce I’m exposing. She uses Harvey and his disabilities for publicity purposes. She thinks it’s ok to put her disabled son on social media to slander other people..whether that person be a public figure or not..it’s hypocritical and disgusting knowing that she went to court for people doing the very same to him. That’s my point.

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Listen...it’s Katie Pryce I’m exposing. She uses Harvey and his disabilities for publicity purposes. She thinks it’s ok to put her disabled son on social media to slander other people..whether that person be a public figure or not..it’s hypocritical and disgusting knowing that she went to court for people doing the very same to him. That’s my point.

No It's Katie Price and ofc that's wrong if she uses her son but her posting a video of Harvey saying **** banter is not actually offensive and cruel and it's not really the same as the abuse Harvey gets now is it? one is banter one is vile. Piers Morgan would actually slate Katie Price for posting that but they get along and knows it's nothing and banter so he laughed at it and told Harvey to bring his banter with him on monday.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

So it’s ok for Katie Pryce to plaster her son all over social media slating somebody in the public eye..but it’s not ok for people to slate her son who she constatantly exposes on social media.
Am I missing something?

Yep, this is pretty much abusive on her part

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Yep, this is pretty much abusive on her part

From what i remember Katie Price actually likes Piers Morgan and so does Harvey and Piers Morgan praised Katie Price before, so i would assume this is banter **** banter is literally nothing and completely harmless.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by LukeB

From what i remember Katie Price actually likes Piers Morgan and so does Harvey and Piers Morgan praised Katie Price before, so i would assume this is banter **** banter is literally nothing and completely harmless.

Oh....that’s ok then...just banter

Why not start being responsible and keeping your disabled son away from social media and stop exposing him using derogatory language...
...but then Katie Pryce will use everyone and anyone to get exposure. I pity her son...she’s an unfit mother.
I wouldn’t expose my son making such comments...and even more so if he was disabled.