FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Big Brother: 2000 - 2024 Individual forums for Big Brother UK series 1- 21 (2000-2023). Also Celebrity Hijack (2008) and Ultimate Big Brother (2010). |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
This may come across controversial especially from BB2 fans so apologies in advance(:
I re-watched both series two and series four last summer and decided to compare them both and tbh I found BB2 to be more of struggle to get through. Im not gonna lie the first 3 weeks of BB2 are amazing and has some great moments i.e Amma v Stuart Stuart v Penny Bubble getting mangled and of course the queen of the series Narinder! But after she left the series fell so flat that literally hardly anything happens after with the exception of Helen and Paul With BB4 Yes i agree the housemates were not the most entertaining bunch but they were a nice group of people and id put none of them as worst housemates of all time. BB4 gave us a lot of underated features that dont get enough praise i.e the saturday night challenges/reward rooms federico flirting with big brother, lisa i can kill you with two fingers ,the amazing tasks like the pedalo task and for me the best twist in BB history The Swap exchange. And I think overall as series BB4 has a lot more going for it than BB2 does. With BB2 we had good characters in Narinder Brian Helen and Penny With BB4 we had jon fed ray tania lisa and anouska How would you all compare both series two and four? Maybe its just me having a soft spot for BB4 because it was my first series to watch but I geniunely didnt struggle as much watching it than BB2. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|