[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

who says chuff is only talking about gay sex ed? I am pretty sure she is talking about sex ed in general

your rush to take offence is staggering more like

The entire topic is about LGBT inclusion in already existing school syllabus.

Come back when you have something to add.

[Twosugars]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

As long as its taught accurately using percentages like 2% of the population etc and explained that the HUGE majority of people are hetrosexual then its fine.

Explain that soaps chase ratings and dont care about accuracy etc

where did you get 2% from?
Links please to prove its validity

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

The entire topic is about LGBT inclusion in already existing school syllabus.

Come back when you have something to add.

and if you had paid attention rather than try to be contrary mary as per you would notice Chuff always talks about sex ed in general. but keep going off at chuff as she is an easy target

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by Twosugars

where did you get 2% from?
Links please to prove its validity

i beleive today you told me, when i asked you a similar question about Hitler (yes you did bring Hitler into a debate) you said "go look it up"

I trust you will be a man of your word

[Twosugars]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

i beleive today you told me, when i asked you a similar question about Hitler (yes you did bring Hitler into a debate) you said "go look it up"

I trust you will be a man of your word

I did bring up Hitler and I'm not apologizing for it. We were talking about extremists. Sue me.

I wondered about your sources bc I don't recognize that figure.
Alternative facts?

[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by Twosugars

I did bring up Hitler and I'm not apologizing for it. We were talking about extremists. Sue me.

I wondered about your sources bc I don't recognize that figure.
Alternative facts?

To be fair, according to this report, LTs figure is correct

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulat...dentityuk/2017

[parmnion]

Why do the government always persecute the Muslim population? This is like rubbing a dogs nose on a pissy carpet.

[Marsh.]

So, do kids need to be assured of the statistics of ginger people? Black people? Green-eyed people in our population?

We don't want them frightened to death that everybody is like that do we? God forbid.

[Twosugars]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Why do the government always persecute the Muslim population? This is like rubbing a dogs nose on a pissy carpet.

And why are you on the side of religious bigotry against equality?

[Twosugars]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

To be fair, according to this report, LTs figure is correct

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulat...dentityuk/2017

Thank you Annie.
But this is self identification only.

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by Twosugars

And why are you on the side of religious bigotry against equality?

I'm not..I'm for equality against religion..from experiences of my friends I would say mostly the Catholic religion.

[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by Twosugars

Thank you Annie.
But this is self identification only.

Yeah, I was going to say that but just thought I would add the link anyway

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Very rare I disagree with you my lovely ........ but IMO children should keep their innocence for as long as possible, childhood goes by so quickly, let them be uncomplicated children for as long as you can

How is knowing that a man can love a woman or a man and woman can love a man or a woman stealing innocence? Surely making out that there's something wrong with that is the only thing that does that?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

How is knowing that a man love a woman or a man and woman can love a man or a woman stealing innocence? Surely making out that there's something wrong with that is the only thing that do that?

Too right.

[parmnion]

Imo that's an easy job for a parent.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Imo that's an easy job for a parent.

So it's fine for them to read books with references to mum and dad or male/female relationships but any reference to a gay relationship must be confined to parents?

That's making gay people taboo. They're not.

If that's your opinion on sex ed in general fair enough but the LGBT inclusion in education is far beyond that.

[parmnion]

Just another case of humans putting themselves before the planet really..parents can take care of this pandering nonsense easily by themselves without a load of strangers force feeding it in one or 2 lessons....


The kids should be being taught about educating thier elderly parents on the harm they are doing to the planet beforethey tackle this if all rumours are to be believed...

Because I'm sorry, you know it, and I know it....if this planet goes paws up the first folk in the spaceship will 100 percent not be gay...unless putins driving.

[Marsh.]

It must be exhausting to try that hard to be edgy.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Just another case of humans putting themselves before the planet really..parents can take care of this pandering nonsense easily by themselves without a load of strangers force feeding it in one or 2 lessons....


The kids should be being taught about educating thier elderly parents on the harm they are doing to the planet beforethey tackle this if all rumours are to be believed...

Because I'm sorry, you know it, and I know it....if this planet goes paws up the first folk in the spaceship will 100 percent not be gay...unless putins driving.

They're totally different issues though tbf.

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

It must be exhausting to try that hard to be edgy.

Took me 20 seconds if I'm honest.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Took me 20 seconds if I'm honest.

Oh well that's good.

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

They're totally different issues though tbf.

They are indeed, but when we are discussing the validation of the subject we can surely give a more pressing matter as an alternative for the learning subject..especially with all the latest news I've heard from central London on the news is to be believed...sort that first..with the generation it is seemingly going to effect then when that's sorted, sort this.

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Oh well that's good.

It is, cause it's effortless...unlike the mammoth effort it will take to even make this pointless task worthwhile.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

It is, cause it's effortless...unlike the mammoth effort it will take to even make this pointless task worthwhile.

What's pointless about adapting education to reflect the world we live in?

It isn't 1952 anymore.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

They are indeed, but when we are discussing the validation of the subject we can surely give a more pressing matter as an alternative for the learning subject..especially with all the latest news I've heard from central London on the news is to be believed...sort that first..with the generation it is seemingly going to effect then when that's sorted, sort this.

Whilst I don't disagree with you that it is something that really needs speaking about and us all doing much much more about, it doesn't have to be an either or thing surely?