[Gap]

[Riz]

why'?

[Callum]

Here we go again..

[Fom]

were all watching y'know ¬.¬

[Wiglet]

Yes need a link now.......

[Red Moon]

Originally posted by rakashmiri
why'?

They had to broadcast the apology during the first eviction show. That was part of the punishment and this is the first eviction show.

[Red Moon]

Originally posted by Gap
OFCOM are Apologising Again

It was Channel 4 that apologised not OFCOM.

[Gap]

Originally posted by Fom
were all watching y'know ¬.¬

This is where people can discuss it

[cgimusic]

ofcom sucks

[leeprice07]

ofcom make TV safe

[Wiglet]

It appeared to be something new or it was how it came across, thank goodness it was not.

[Gap]

Originally posted by Red Moon

It was Channel 4 that apologised not OFCOM.

Changed

[Red Moon]

Originally posted by Gap

Changed

Thanks.

I knew what you meant but some others might have not and wouldn't have posted.

[Feral]

http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/obb/prog_cb/obb86/

Full statement here. Bit long winded though!!!

[Red Moon]

Originally posted by leeprice07
ofcom make TV safe

They are censors in away and regulate what you can and can't see on TV it doesn't mean it makes TV safe.

[Wiglet]

Agreed with Red Moon and a little frightening but then we need a safety net don't we? Oh we can't win can we?

[nodisharmony]

Apologies are cheaper than a fine






nodisharmony

[Gap]

I agree, but a fine would have meant that there was racist behavior going on and that's what it was not.

[spacebandit]

Originally posted by Gap
I agree, but a fine would have meant that there was racist behavior going on and that's what it was not.

Not according to the OFCOM report, which C4 and Łndemol accept - hence the apologies

[Tom4784]

Those apologies are annoying can we complain to Ofcom about Ofcom? The adverts are overlong and not needed because everyone saw the first one and if they didn't most peole know about it!