[Cherie]

A Dad who went from being amazing in 2016 to not being so amazing in 2017 does not make any sense

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Cherie

A Dad who went from being amazing in 2016 to not being so amazing in 2017 does not make any sense

Of course it does. People do things that break up families all the time.

The only ones who know the exact details of what happened between them are the two of them.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Cherie

A Dad who went from being amazing in 2016 to not being so amazing in 2017 does not make any sense

No one wants to give this any merit cherie.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

He ain't entitled to jack**** and by selling out his own daughter, he's only showing them why he should never know his grandchild.

I have no time for narcissists who believe they are entitled to their grandchildren and blame the world when it's their own toxic actions that got them cast out from their children's lives.

But if the 2 Ex Royals
do meet him,
it will end all TV interviews.

They should Send a Car
to take him up to Canada
keep it a private meeting.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by arista

But if the 2 Ex Royals
do meet him,
it will end all TV interviews.

They should Send a Car
to take him up to Canada
keep it a private meeting.

And give the narcissist what he wants so that whenever he's unhappy about not being the center of Meghan's world he can run to the papers all over again until she gives in?

WOEFUL advice, Arista. You take power away from a narcissist, you don't give it them. Let him bleat on about her, it'll do him no good and it'll just solidify to her and anyone of sound mind that he deserves to be disowned.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Cherie

A Dad who went from being amazing in 2016 to not being so amazing in 2017 does not make any sense

When you have a difficult relationship with your parents, you tend to sugarcoat it for the outside world because it's easier than letting strangers in and knowing things about your homelife that you aren't ready to share.

She probably had an epiphany and realised that he doesn't have to have that power over her, that she doesn't need his presence in her life. Things like that can happen suddenly or slowly over time, there's no rule book on it.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

And give the narcissist what he wants so that whenever he's unhappy about not being the center of Meghan's world he can run to the papers all over again until she gives in?

WOEFUL advice, Arista. You take power away from a narcissist, you don't give it them. Let him bleat on about her, it'll do him no good and it'll just solidify to her and anyone of sound mind that he deserves to be disowned.

He Helped her alone
age 11-18.

Its not up to you
She can choose what to do
before he is dead.

[arista]

Originally Posted by arista

Thanking her Dad
in a big way.

Posting again for Dezzy,

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

When you have a difficult relationship with your parents, you tend to sugarcoat it for the outside world because it's easier than letting strangers in and knowing things about your homelife that you aren't ready to share.

She probably had an epiphany and realised that he doesn't have to have that power over her, that she doesn't need his presence in her life. Things like that can happen suddenly or slowly over time, there's no rule book on it.

Given he was going to walk her down the aisle I call codswallop on the above

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

No one wants to give this any merit cherie.

It’s a hell of a turn around, I find it odd Harry has never met him in person if only once

[Kazanne]

There are always two sides to a story , no matter which one you prefer, no harm in him giving his side,if its wrong I am sure she will counteract.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Cherie

It’s a hell of a turn around, I find it odd Harry has never met him in person if only once

You know saint Megan can do no wrong in people’s eyes.

Let him keep talking I say.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Given he was going to walk her down the aisle I call codswallop on the above

Again, you don't know. You want a reason to hate her so you vindicate her father despite red flags the size of skyscrapers.

A narcissistic parent can have a lot of control over their kids, it very well could be that she didn't truly break free of that control until 2017. I know narcissism when I see it, I know the patterns of the carrot and the stick that they use and how they always see themselves as the victims and Thomas Markle, from everything I've seen, is a classic case of it.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Again, you don't know. You want a reason to hate her so you vindicate her father despite red flags the size of skyscrapers.

A narcissistic parent can have a lot of control over their kids, it very well could be that she didn't truly break free of that control until 2017. I know narcissism when I see it, I know the patterns of the carrot and the stick that they use and how they always see themselves as the victims and Thomas Markle, from everything I've seen, is a classic case of it.

Your trying claim your opinion is fact. With what you know when you see it.

It’s speculation like anyone’s else’s opinion.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

There are always two sides to a story , no matter which one you prefer, no harm in him giving his side,if its wrong I am sure she will counteract.

Why should she have a slinging match with him in public because he saw money in it? I'm pretty sure she's never commented on her dad so why should she do so now and give him what he wants when people defending the dad would find fault if she did just that.

If his concerns were genuine, he would have tried to reconnect without making money from the press. It's honestly concerning that there are people who think she should give into him when he's behaved terribly towards her.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Your trying claim your opinion is fact. With what you know when you see it.

It’s speculation like anyone’s else’s opinion.

Yes , thank you for pointing out the obvious, Do you actually have anything to add to the topic or are you just going to pretend that I'm stating facts when anyone with a bit of reading comprehension can tell I'm sharing my views just like anyone else?

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by arista

He Helped her alone
age 11-18.

Its not up to you
She can choose what to do
before he is dead.

Plenty of parents care for children their whole lives and do so without a sense of ownership or entitlement to that child's life when they are grown up. It's blatant narcissism and self-entitlement to believe that he has any rights to her life when it's down purely to her.

She is choosing what she wants to do, she has chosen not to have him in her life and it's her right to do so.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Dezzy;10764341[B

]Again, you don't know. You want a reason to hate [/B]her so you vindicate her father despite red flags the size of skyscrapers.

A narcissistic parent can have a lot of control over their kids, it very well could be that she didn't truly break free of that control until 2017. I know narcissism when I see it, I know the patterns of the carrot and the stick that they use and how they always see themselves as the victims and Thomas Markle, from everything I've seen, is a classic case of it.

I don't hate her, just puzzled by their behaviour as a couple

I quite like her actually so wrong again

You don't hold any psychology degrees so I would hold off with the embarrassing web definitions

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by arista

Posting again for Dezzy,

See what I said to Cherie, it's easy to put on a public face and pretend that your family life is fine when it's not. I'm sure there's lots of people here who can relate to that.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I don't hate her, just puzzled by their behaviour as a couple

I quite like her actually so wrong again

You don't hold any psychology degrees so I would hold off with the embarrassing web definitions

So your entire response is an attack aimed at me. Typical.

If you don't like what i'm saying, argue against it. You know nothing about me and you will only continue to embarrass yourself if you try to lash out at me personally instead of arguing against my points.

[Twosugars]

Is he an alcoholic? Or any other substance abuse?

[arista]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Plenty of parents care for children their whole lives and do so without a sense of ownership or entitlement to that child's life when they are grown up. It's blatant narcissism and self-entitlement to believe that he has any rights to her life when it's down purely to her.

She is choosing what she wants to do, she has chosen not to have him in her life and it's her right to do so.

So Far
today was a good interview
she can change her mind

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

So your entire response is an attack aimed at me. Typical.

If you don't like what i'm saying, argue against it. You know nothing about me and you will only continue to embarrass yourself if you try to lash out at me personally instead of arguing against my points.

So telling me I hate her isn’t a personal attack lol

You aren’t making any points, just trotting out your opinion in the form of psychobabble, what am I meant to argue against precisely?

[Alf]

What an utterly vile woman she is.

Took all our tax payers money for her wedding and then pissed off when she found out that virtue signaling was a no no in her royal duty. And then called us all racists on her way out.

And she's turned Harry into a simp.

Good riddence.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Twosugars

Is he an alcoholic? Or any other substance abuse?

not now