[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Wow I wasn't aware you were close friends with Meghan & Harry , how's baby Archie doing ?? he's soo cute .

They want their privacy, so keep your nose out

[jet]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

They have had countless nannies and have one now.

On their 4th in 8 months, not to mention the other staff that have resigned.
More red flags...but it couldn't be anything to do with Meghan, could it?

[jet]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

They want their privacy, so keep your nose out

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

They want their privacy, so keep your nose out

Oh the irony

[jet]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Oh the irony

You're missing the real irony here

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by jet

You're missing the real irony here

Course I am you keep telling yourself that

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Oh the irony

I’ve not been looking they their curtains.

Stop trying to be clever and I won’t have to make you look silly.

[GoldHeart]

It's amazing how Piers Morgan has forgotten this , and he wants to say Meghan hasn't experienced any racism .

Youtube video

Youtube video

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by jet

Meanwhile, you are brushing her initial neglectful and callous behaviour under the table - not even alluding to it in fact at all - and slamming him to justify your like of her and dislike of him, whereas I have said on here what he is doing now is wrong and he is now losing the plot.
If Meghan owes him nothing, then the same can be said for him owing her nothing either...relationships are a two - way street.

She doesn't have a duty of care to him, how can she 'neglect' him? What, do you think she has to be the dutiful daughter regardless of what **** he throws her way? Parents don't own their children, they aren't entitled to rule over their lives and make demands of them as adults when they have gone out of their way to attack and alienate their children for monetary gain. Actions have consequences, her father's cruelty and greed has ensured he will likely never meet his grandson or play a role in his daughter's life and he has no one to blame but himself.

I dislike narcissistic abuse and this man ****ing REEKS of it and it's making me despair that there are people out there defending this greedy twat just because he opposes someone they hate. Would you honestly be saying the same thing if it was anyone other than Meghan's dad? Be honest with yourself.

Also your last sentence is grim, 'if she doesn't want a relationship with him then it's fair game for him to trash his own daughter in the press for profit.' You're basically okaying his actions of trying to force his daughter to acknowledge him when she has made it clear she doesn't want to. What gives him the right to do that when all she's done is decide she doesn't want a relationship with him? You say it's a two way street but I reckon she'd gladly take him disowning her at this point but it's not a two way street because what he is doing is worse.

What he is doing is wrong and no amount of mental gymnastics will change that.

[parmnion]

It's a bit of a reach to describe a man who has given over half a million dollars of his own money to further his daughter's career, as greedy

[arista]

Live from Mexico
he is on GMBHD itv.




Richard told her Dad
she moves on.
Even her Dad.

[joeysteele]

I feel for anyone not permitted to see their Grandchildren.
However him turning up on TV putting her down again, isn't the right way to do things and rightly isn't going to persuade her to let him see them.

It's for the Parents to decide who sees their children and if he was to even attempt to talk to his grandchildren about their Mother, the way he does on TV.

Then no wonder he's excluded, in my view.

[arista]

He claims
it is the only way he can speak to her?

[bitontheslide]

Originally Posted by arista

He claims
it is the only way he can speak to her?

a man with serious mental issues clearly. You can't force someone to meet/talk to you

[Glenn.]

Appalling man

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

a man with serious mental issues clearly. You can't force someone to meet/talk to you

That's the truth.

In fact it's more likely to push her further away.

[GoldHeart]

He doesn't know when to quit, he's a pitiful worm .

[Toy Soldier]

Originally Posted by arista

He claims
it is the only way he can speak to her?

If he would just leave her alone she might eventually have decided to make contact with him, if and when she wanted to make contact with him. I think he's pretty much blown any chance of that now. He doesn't have a "right" to see or speak to her or communicate with her in any way... sheer entitlement.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

If he would just leave her alone she might eventually have decided to make contact with him, if and when she wanted to make contact with him. I think he's pretty much blown any chance of that now. He doesn't have a "right" to see or speak to her or communicate with her in any way... sheer entitlement.

Does it drive you nuts?

[Toy Soldier]

Originally Posted by Alf

Does it drive you nuts?

It's none of my business nor anyone elses who isn't a member of their family so ... no I couldn't really give a ****.

[LeatherTrumpet]

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

If he would just leave her alone she might eventually have decided to make contact with him, if and when she wanted to make contact with him. I think he's pretty much blown any chance of that now. He doesn't have a "right" to see or speak to her or communicate with her in any way... sheer entitlement.

He has a right to see his grandkids.

[Mitchell]

Originally Posted by parmnion

He has a right to see his grandkids.

He doesn’t.

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by Mitchell

He doesn’t.

Ok...

She doesnt have the right to stop them seeing him then...


Only a total bitch would do that to her kids and parents.

[Toy Soldier]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Ok...

She doesnt have the right to stop them seeing him then...

Legally, yes she does, until they're old enough to make that decision for themselves.

Only a total bitch would do that to her kids and parents.

You have no idea what her reasons are so you can't confidently make that statement. For example, if someone was raised in an abusive household, I'd find it very understandable (even expected) if that person then wanted their kids to have nothing to do with the grandparents, or at least very limited contact. I personally would extend that to any massive differences in personal philosophies (e.g. racism, homophobia) IF they can't keep that to themselves when they're around the kids. Being around an angry/abusive/disrespectful grandparent is far worse for a kid than not seeing them at all.