FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
14-06-2020, 12:24 PM | #26 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Again, officers can bring down a mass shooter and not hurt him but they can't de-escalate a situation with an unarmed black man without killing him?
Last edited by Tom4784; 14-06-2020 at 12:25 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
14-06-2020, 12:25 PM | #27 | |||
|
||||
POW! BLAM!
|
Death Wish <3
love the old movies where the pensioner runs around killing folks <3 |
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-06-2020, 12:25 PM | #28 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
They gave Dylan Roof Burger King
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-06-2020, 12:27 PM | #29 | ||
|
|||
-
|
It's not normal. Shooting a fleeing suspect in the back is against the rules. It's a fireable offense, and was the specific justification for taking action against this officer. I mean feel free to look it up...
|
||
Reply With Quote |
14-06-2020, 12:29 PM | #30 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
He escaped from a Cuff Arrest took a taser gun from one officer Fired it hitting one officer on the arm. That Police man was running and fired his gun that sadly killed him. He was so drunk he was asleep in the line of cars at that Wendys Dezzy are you saying he was not a Drunk Driver? |
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-06-2020, 12:30 PM | #31 | |||
|
||||
POW! BLAM!
|
Exactly, I wouldn't wish that on anyone!
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-06-2020, 12:31 PM | #32 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-06-2020, 12:45 PM | #33 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
You think a black man deserves to die for running away and being drunk but you keep ignoring my point that white mass shooters have been taken in alive? |
||
Reply With Quote |
14-06-2020, 06:31 PM | #34 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Why on earth didn’t he just shoot him in the leg just to slow him down ? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-06-2020, 07:24 PM | #35 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Situations like this make it clear that guns are the easy resort for cops rather than the last one. |
||
Reply With Quote |
14-06-2020, 09:53 PM | #36 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
What’s going on with Sky and their headlines?
They have a moving banner saying a Black guy who had fallen asleep in his car was shot and killed by police .. yet I’ve read elsewhere that he was drunk , resisted arrest , fought two cops off and managed to get hold of one of their tasers , pointed it at the cop who then reacted by shooting him dead . It’s an awful story and at worst I’d have expected the cop to shoot to immobilise the guy rather than killing ... but the Sky headline seems misleading IF what I read about the incident was correct Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-06-2020, 09:57 PM | #37 | |||
|
||||
I Cant Breathe
|
They had back up on the way and had his details, they could have let him go without killing him
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-06-2020, 10:08 PM | #38 | |||
|
||||
Queen of Walford
|
I get that he needed to be stopped, a taser can be deadly and he was obviously not fit to drive.
However, when he was fleeing, why did the cop not use the other taser? Why shoot the suspect 3 times in the back instead of maybe once in the leg or shoulder?
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-06-2020, 10:18 PM | #39 | ||
|
|||
thesheriff443
|
Doing stupid things can get you killed.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
14-06-2020, 10:24 PM | #40 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Sadly "while running" it's harder to get such a required shot out. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-06-2020, 10:25 PM | #41 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-06-2020, 10:30 PM | #42 | ||
|
|||
thesheriff443
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
14-06-2020, 10:34 PM | #43 | |||
|
||||
I Cant Breathe
|
Yet white supremacists can storm buildings with guns and not get punished
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-06-2020, 10:36 PM | #44 | ||
|
|||
thesheriff443
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
14-06-2020, 10:42 PM | #45 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
15-06-2020, 08:45 AM | #46 | |||
|
||||
POW! BLAM!
|
Quote:
How do you know they were "white supremacists", I assume you're talking about the anti-lockdown mob? They were armed to the teeth, if they actually wanted to storm the building, they could have. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
15-06-2020, 09:05 AM | #47 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
15-06-2020, 09:30 AM | #48 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Very sad situation, its unclear why the situation changed so quickly as it was so composed, agree with others if the policeman didn't have a gun, there would be no death, not sure how they can address that in the USA given the public can bear arms though
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' |
|||
Reply With Quote |
15-06-2020, 10:37 AM | #49 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
They did storm the building. They were inside, lining the corridors and stairs. They didn't have to enter by force, because no one tried to stop them. Being fair; there is no evidence that these people were white supremacists. They were just white. Their issue was with lockdown. However the important point with the whole thing is: What do you think would have happened if 50 heavily armed black men had turned up at that same government building demanding to get inside. If you think it would be anything other than absolute carnage, you're not paying attention. |
||
Reply With Quote |
15-06-2020, 11:05 AM | #50 | |||
|
||||
Queen of Walford
|
So why shoot 3 times?
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|