[arista]

[BBC Text:
Sunday People says that the
Duchess of Sussex's sister,
Samantha, is in talks with lawyers
and wants to sue the royal.]

[jet]

This is getting messier and messier….the half sis now weighting in….

Meghan appears to believe that having children to different fathers is a slur on someone’s character; a failure on their part; bringing children into her disagreement with her half sister that has nothing to do with them is disgusting. More hypocrisy when she demands so much privacy for her own.

Why was Meghan making sure this info was passed on to Scobie for inclusion in the book? Aren’t those painful family situations the very ones that Meghan professes to want to help - “compassion in action” and “family unity” blah blah etc. What a joke. Even the tabloids didn’t touch it when they were printing stories about the Meghan/Samantha stuff.
I wonder what the negative effects will be on and Harry’s charity going forward, all this sneaky passing of info.lies and perjury? It certainly can’t enhance their aims, whatever they are, can it?

[Jordan.]

The same sister that wrote a book about Meghan doesn't like having a mirror held up to herself shocker.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

The same sister that wrote a book about Meghan doesn't like having a mirror held up to herself shocker.

It was more about her own life, there wasn't that much about Meghan in it - and nothing Megs could sue over.
At least she was forthright and open, she wasn't sneaky and manipulative about what she had to say.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by jet

It was more about her own life, there wasn't that much about Meghan in it - and nothing Megs could sue over.
At least she was forthright and open, she wasn't sneaky and manipulative about what she had to say.

How shocking, it's almost like she just uses Meghan's name for her own monetary benefit.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

How shocking, it's almost like she just uses Meghan's name for her own monetary benefit.

That's pretty obvious.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by jet

That's pretty obvious.

and yet you lap it up?

[jet]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

and yet you lap it up?

Actually, no. Lady Colin Campbells book about Meghan was a much more entertaining read. Available on Amazon, great reviews.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by jet

Actually, no. Lady Colin Campbells book about Meghan was a much more entertaining read. Available on Amazon, great reviews.

Yes I'm sure you have the full cash grab collection... something about fools and their money.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Yes I'm sure you have the full cash grab collection... something about fools and their money.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by jet

This is getting messier and messier….the half sis now weighting in….

Meghan appears to believe that having children to different fathers is a slur on someone’s character; a failure on their part; bringing children into her disagreement with her half sister that has nothing to do with them is disgusting. More hypocrisy when she demands so much privacy for her own.

Why was Meghan making sure this info was passed on to Scobie for inclusion in the book? Aren’t those painful family situations the very ones that Meghan professes to want to help - “compassion in action” and “family unity” blah blah etc. What a joke. Even the tabloids didn’t touch it when they were printing stories about the Meghan/Samantha stuff.
I wonder what the negative effects will be on and Harry’s charity going forward, all this sneaky passing of info.lies and perjury? It certainly can’t enhance their aims, whatever they are, can it?

So much for female empowerment

[parmnion]

Goodness me, princess billy no mates, isnt having much luck.

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Goodness me, princess billy no mates, isnt having much luck.

Princess Private cant buy a good headline this year

and the GBP remain unshocked

[rusticgal]

I think it was a dirty move to deliberately want to reveal those facts to the publisher in order to hurt her half sister….then go on to deny doing it.
So much for #bekind#….

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I think it was a dirty move to deliberately want to reveal those facts to the publisher in order to hurt her half sister….then go on to deny doing it.
So much for #bekind#….

Stand in your Truth

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Stand in your Truth

….the list goes on…the hypocrisy is unreal…

[Liam-]

She hasn’t made enough money off of her yet?

[Elliot]

Sick of her family selling stories on her tbh, if it were anyone else we’d all agree they’re trash for doing so

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by Elliot

Sick of her family selling stories on her tbh, if it were anyone else we’d all agree they’re trash for doing so

no we would not

[LeatherTrumpet]

Princess Private's poor father forced to defend himself

Youtube video

[arista]

Better days back in 2011

[jet]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ified-him.html

Meghan's father kept letter secret for six months - until it was revealed in People article that 'vilified' him

The Duchess of Sussex’s father kept her explosive letter ‘totally private’ for six months, only releasing extracts after an ‘attack’ from his daughter’s friends in a US magazine, a court heard last week.
The claim that Thomas Markle was provoked into releasing details of the letter is central to a privacy case at the Court of Appeal, which last week heard a series of bombshell revelations as one of Meghan’s former aides supplied fresh evidence….
…………………………
Another angle on this is that the letter shouldn’t be considered private once her friends had leaked the contents. Rather, her fathers privacy had then been invaded and he had a right to defend himself.
Devious Meghan didn’t sue People mag for revealing what was in the letter, did she? Hmmm...

[Tom4784]

Deleted Post

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

People still obssessed with hating her? Grim.

What do you think her latest failings dezzy?

[bitontheslide]

when people start using generic terms like hater, it's because they have no valid argument to use in defence