[arista]

USA Supreme Court Overturns Roe V Wade


SkyNewsHD Live


https://news.sky.com/story/roe-v-wad...dates-12637381



https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-61928898

[Liam-]

A truly dark day for American women, having their rights stripped away by a panel of compromised extremists and they definitely won’t stop there

[arista]

[Supreme Court OVERRULES
Roe v. Wade saying the 'Constitution does not
confer a right to abortion': Ends nearly 50 years of
constitutional protection for terminations]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Roe-TODAY.html

[arista]

Originally Posted by Liam-

A truly dark day for American women, having their rights stripped away by a panel of compromised extremists and they definitely won’t stop there

Only for some.


These are Lifetime Judges


They knew this was on the way.

[arista]

[arista]

Hell Yes. Madame

[arista]

[arista]

Nancy Pelosi is now Live


She blames Trump.

[Alf]

I'll get some popcorn for the riots.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by arista

Nancy Pelosi is now Live


She blames Trump.

Of course she does.

Having "Democrats" ruling the House, Senate, and Presidency, it's clear where their bread is truly buttered.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Alf

I'll get some popcorn for the riots.

Only the Left Wingers

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

Only for some.


These are Lifetime Judges


They knew this was on the way.

Every single one of them said roe was settled law and they wouldn't overturn it, in their hearings.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Of course she does.

Having "Democrats" ruling the House, Senate, and Presidency, it's clear where their bread is truly buttered.

I know you know next to nothing about anything, but what the dems hold now is irrelevant in this matter, as it has all been done in the sc.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

what the dems hold now is irrelevant in this matter, as it has all been done in the sc.

If they wanted to do something about it, they would.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

If they wanted to do something about it, they would.

Such as, Einstein?

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Such as?

Protect the rights through new legislature?

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Protect the rights through new legislature?

Impossible to pass the senate as it would need 60 votes. Dems have 51 senators, but 2 of those side with republicans 95% of the time (manchin and sinema).

No republican would vote for it, especially with November elections on the horizon. Anything else, Aristotle?

[Liam-]

Ah, of course it’s the democrats fault that the republicans cheated to block Obama from appointing someone to the court and then packed the court with their own hand picked extremists, to dismantle everything they can in the name of religion

[The Slim Reaper]

All the anti-trans allies of women sure lost interest in protecting womens rights, the minute their actual rights have been infringed. I wish I could have seen this coming...

[bitontheslide]

all it does is put the responsibility back on each individual state. The largest populations are all democrat states and they will all allow abortion as before. Its a backward step for those living in republican states, but they largely support the supreme court ruling anyway

[Liam-]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

All the anti-trans allies of women sure lost interest in protecting womens rights, the minute their actual rights have been infringed. I wish I could have seen this coming...

They’ll be happy again when scotus goes after the same-sex intimacy and marriage rulings like Clarence Thomas wants to do, don’t worry

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Liam-

They’ll be happy again when scotus goes after the same-sex intimacy and marriage rulings like Clarence Thomas wants to do, don’t worry

Criminalisation for abortion is up next. Gays have got a good full year before they're up. Absolutely pitiful culture warriors.

[Toy Soldier]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

all it does is put the responsibility back on each individual state. The largest populations are all democrat states and they will all allow abortion as before. Its a backward step for those living in republican states, but they largely support the supreme court ruling anyway

This is a massive misconception to be honest; it's like saying the whole UK supports Tory policies because our election outcomes keep coming up Tory. The MOST republican state is only 65% red, and most red states are much closer to 50% than that. It would be much simpler if people were indeed clustered in the states that matched their own politics and beliefs... in reality, at least 1/3 of even the reddest states are not Republicans.

[bitontheslide]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

This is a massive misconception to be honest; it's like saying the whole UK supports Tory policies because our election outcomes keep coming up Tory. The MOST republican state is only 65% red, and most red states are much closer to 50% than that. It would be much simpler if people were indeed clustered in the states that matched their own politics and beliefs... in reality, at least 1/3 of even the reddest states are not Republicans.

But we have all seen the weird bible bashing states on the TV. The people that live there know what it's all about and what its like to live there. There will be nothing shocking to them in this ruling, to suggest otherwise is intentionally misleading

[Toy Soldier]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

But we have all seen the weird bible bashing states on the TV. The people that live there know what it's all about and what its like to live there. There will be nothing shocking to them in this ruling, to suggest otherwise is intentionally misleading

Well yes but that's like saying it's not shocking when Tories let school children go hungry so that they can give their London pals another tax cut. It's not shocking at all but it's still absolutely appalling. If anything it's worse that it isn't shocking.