[thesheriff443]

His brother poured his heart out to him on the day of their nans funeral only for harry to dismiss it as a lie.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

His brother poured his heart out to him on the day of their nans funeral only for harry to dismiss it as a lie.

He even used the ‘code’ making him look him in the eye….but it still wasn’t good enough…
Because they want to play the victims…and then says no one has reached out. If that wasn’t a ‘reach out’ then what more does he want.
He is goading for a public response….he knows he won’t get it so he will just keep prodding and hoping the ‘silence’ from his father and William will be portrayed as guilt.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

To sum up harry
I’m seeing a therapist but there is nothing wrong with me it’s my family that are in the wrong

I mean you can see he is repeating everything these therapists are feeding him…

[Swan]

He did just say, im watching on record, that's he's not stuck in the past.....Hmmm???

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Swan

He did just say, im watching on record, that's he's not stuck in the past.....Hmmm???

He said driving at speed while having a few drinks wouldn’t cause a crash

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

He even used the ‘code’ making him look him in the eye….but it still wasn’t good enough…
Because they want to play the victims…and then says no one has reached out. If that wasn’t a ‘reach out’ then what more does he want.
He is goading for a public response….he knows he won’t get it so he will just keep prodding and hoping the ‘silence’ from his father and William will be portrayed as guilt.

It wasn’t good enough because he knew William didn’t mean it. Were you listening or is your blind hatred causing you to dismiss everything?

[Glenn.]

From the interview we can pretty much dismiss everything that comes from royal/palace insiders which is basically 99% of all stories about the pair of them.

William and Kate aren’t the innocent sweet couple everyone thinks they are and as I suspected, didn’t make Meghan feel at all welcome. We knew it was Kate that made Meghan cry over bridesmaids dresses. At least she had the decency to apologise and bring flowers.

William is an awful person, which I have long suspected. A vicious bad tempered bully by the sounds of it. He’s lucky he has a brother willing to forgive his actions.

What he said about Charles was pretty much on the money. Camilla also.

[arista]

Tom is a good interviewer
of course easy for him
as he has been given the advanced book to read.

For many
no need to buy the book.

[arista]

The Driver of Diana's car was drunk.
not sure why he ignores that.

To everyone
that driver killed Diana

[jet]

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-fa...leasant-watch/

Harry: The Interview, ITV - ‘It was a strong interview but unpleasant to watch’
Tom Bradby came with a journalist’s agenda and, politely, began to question what he was hearing from Prince Harry
ByAnita Singh,

Prince Harry has been in therapy for years, and Harry: The Interview made one thing clear: it hasn’t solved his anger issues.
“I’m in such a good headspace now. The reality is, I’ve never been happier,” he said at the end, but the programme told a different story. Furious, defensive and just plain sad, it was a difficult watch for those of us who had hoped that life in Montecito might bring Harry the peace he claims to crave.

To all the historic reasons for that anger, Harry can now add Tom Bradby, chosen by the Sussexes as a friendly face (it was Bradby who spoke to Meghan on the couple’s South Africa tour and asked her, kindly, if she was doing OK). Harry appeared to have turned up for this interview in the belief that Bradby would merely be a conduit for his grievances, a way to deliver them unfiltered to a British television audience.

But Bradby came with a journalist’s agenda and, politely, began to question what he was hearing. With every suggestion he made - that the Royal family will be reeling from the disclosures of their private conversations in Harry’s memoir, that Harry hadn’t so much burned his bridges as “taken a flamethrower to them” - the interview became testier. Harry’s face grew pinker.

He seemed incredulous that someone was challenging his narrative. Bradby ventured that William might view the breakdown in the sibling relationship differently - “I think he would say he found you emotional, defensive, he couldn’t get through to you…” Harry glared at Bradby. “It’s quite a list of assumptions you’re making,” he seethed....

......Bradby attempted to lighten the tone by bringing up the chapter in which Harry talks about losing his virginity. “It’s four lines or something,” Harry said dismissively. “We can talk about you losing your virginity if you want.” Well, no, because Tom Bradby hasn’t just spilled the details of his first sexual encounter for all the world to read.

So in terms of scoops the interview had little to recommend it, because every bit of the book had been done to death. As a psychological study, though, it was grimly fascinating. Nothing is Harry’s fault, and almost everything can be blamed on the press. He mentioned the tabloids more times than I could count, with a relentlessness that bordered on the obsessive....

It was a strong interview but unpleasant to watch. Bradby looked exhausted by the end. Although I do suspect that, after this interview, he will be back on the Buckingham Palace Christmas card list.

[arista]

[Harry: The Interview, ITV - ‘It was a strong interview but unpleasant to watch’
Tom Bradby came with a journalist’s agenda and, politely, began to question what he was hearing from Prince Harry
ByAnita Singh,]


Of course Jet.

I did not find much new
so much on TV and Radio
for weeks

[jet]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

From the interview we can pretty much dismiss everything that comes from royal/palace insiders which is basically 99% of all stories about the pair of them.

William and Kate aren’t the innocent sweet couple everyone thinks they are and as I suspected, didn’t make Meghan feel at all welcome. We knew it was Kate that made Meghan cry over bridesmaids dresses. At least she had the decency to apologise and bring flowers.

William is an awful person, which I have long suspected. A vicious bad tempered bully by the sounds of it. He’s lucky he has a brother willing to forgive his actions.

What he said about Charles was pretty much on the money. Camilla also.

Oh Glenn, will the scales ever fall from your eyes.

[arista]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

He said driving at speed while having a few drinks wouldn’t cause a crash

He is wrong

[arista]

Harry is making this worse.

He loves the word "Suffering"

He talks about Caroline Flack
in the book.
Very clever of him to plug the book.
at 1 hour at 19mins


I will not buy it
unless it is in poundland

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

From the interview we can pretty much dismiss everything that comes from royal/palace insiders which is basically 99% of all stories about the pair of them.

William and Kate aren’t the innocent sweet couple everyone thinks they are and as I suspected, didn’t make Meghan feel at all welcome. We knew it was Kate that made Meghan cry over bridesmaids dresses. At least she had the decency to apologise and bring flowers.

William is an awful person, which I have long suspected. A vicious bad tempered bully by the sounds of it. He’s lucky he has a brother willing to forgive his actions.

What he said about Charles was pretty much on the money. Camilla also.

Tbh I'm suspicious about William as a person as well, I can't quite put my finger on it as to why I feel that way, but I don't quite believe he is exactly how the Media in this country wants us to see him.

However I'm gonna guess that Harry is telling the broad-strokes of what has been going on between himself and William, but I am gonna guess that he is omitting parts where he has done wrong to William as well, because tbf it's Human Nature to be the victim when feeling indignant about something.

But I definitely believe Harry that William is more unlikable than our Media would care to admit.

[arista]

[arista]

At 1 hour 33mins
he says he is happy.

He thinks that will anger some?

Not me.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by jet

Oh Glenn, will the scales ever fall from your eyes.

I’m not blinded by hatred. I’d rather hear his account of things than rely on tabloids like everybody else.

[Cherie]

Will have to watch the whole thing, must say I was pretty impressed with what I saw of Tom, didnt know the two of them went to school together, but he appeared very professional and was doing his job rather than chatting with an old friend.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Will have to watch the whole thing, must say I was pretty impressed with what I saw of Tom, didnt know the two of them went to school together, but he appeared very professional and was doing his job rather than chatting with an old friend.

Yes he was good but he wanted to go deeper into the events but harry got defensive.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Will have to watch the whole thing, must say I was pretty impressed with what I saw of Tom, didnt know the two of them went to school together, but he appeared very professional and was doing his job rather than chatting with an old friend.

I don't think I could sit and watch it all ,an hour and a half ...bliddy hell .

[thesheriff443]

But only someone totally heartless didn’t get choked up when he read out the part of William telling him he loved him and only wanted him to be happy.

[jet]

The Times
Prince Harry interview review — will the whingeing ever stop?
By Carol Midgley
(EXCERPTS)

OK, we heard him say repeatedly that he wants “accountability”, whatever that means, but what’s the endgame in hanging all this dirty family washing on the line. Revenge? Reconciliation? Your own regular slot on Loose Women?

Bradby, an old chum of Harry’s, did rattle him a couple of times with some right hooks. Towards the end Bradby suggested, possibly to national cheers, that many people in Britain wish he would “shut up and stop talking about it”. “Stop talking about what?” asked Harry, askance. Erm, take a wild guess.

Bradby also highlighted the hypocrisy of Harry railing for years against invasions of his own privacy while relentlessly invading that of his “nearest and dearest”, ie his father and brother without their permission to sell a book.

There followed some waffle from Harry about his family having briefed the press against him, an accusation he made over and over again. But who? Which stories? Give us evidence. Who exactly is “in bed with the devil”?

When Bradby asked him what he would say to William if he were watching, Harry bridled indignantly, clutching his pearls, saying that “what I have to say to them and what they have to say to me will be in private. Hello? Irony alert.

This is the man who had just described his brother pushing him over in a row “breaking my necklace’ and told the entire world of a deeply intimate moment when William had sworn on his dead mother’s life that he only wanted Harry to be happy. Amazing.

At one point Harry spoke of people wrongly thinking they moved to America “for money” which might have been a good time to mention the $100million deal with Netflix and the $20 million for his book.
Overall Bradby did a good interviewing job, often with a visibly raised eyebrow gently trying to show Harry where he had contradicted himself.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

I don't think I could sit and watch it all ,an hour and a half ...bliddy hell .

Tbh there are so many ad breaks its about 50 mins tops

[arista]

ITVX claims to be showing the CBS 60 minutes with HARRY


So far it is not on there