[Zizu]

Originally Posted by hijaxers

Its Harry thats tedious and tiresome .

I like him ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[arista]

[arista]

The Online Paper:

SkyNews Text:
[Lawyers for the Duke of Sussex
have said Prince William
was paid a "very large sum of money" by
Rupert Murdoch's newspaper business in
the UK to settle a phone-hacking claim,
The Independent reports.]

[arista]

BBC News Text :
[The Guardian also leads with the Prince Harry case
but opts for the headline that he claimed
Queen Elizabeth II had herself threatened
Rupert Murdoch's media firm with
legal action - but was "undermined" by
the then-Prince Charles.]

[jet]

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/p...liam-rczwz9xms

Prince Harry’s phone-hacking claim has ‘inconsistencies’A judge has questioned why the claim filed in 2020 failed to mention a secret deal that allegedly prevented the duke taking action earlier

The Duke of Sussex appears to have “factual inconsistencies” in his legal claim about being a victim of hacking, a senior judge said.
Mr Justice Fancourt said he has concerns about Harry’s account of an alleged secret deal by the royal family, which he says prevented him bringing legal action earlier.

Harry, 38, has accused the late Queen of being involved in an agreement with the publisher of The Sun and the News of the World. He says his brother secretly accepted a “very large sum” in compensation from the publisher in 2020.
The judge questioned why details of Harry’s legal claim filed in 2020 failed to include the alleged secret deal which the duke now says means the publisher accepted it would not try to block his compensation claim because it was too old.

The judge added: “Another thing that is troubling is what appears to be a factual inconsistency in the current pleaded cases that the Duke of Sussex did not have the knowledge [of the alleged wrongdoing] before 2019 and your proposed amendment seems to say he would have brought the claim in 2012 but for the secret agreement.”
Harry’s barrister, David Sherborne, said the claim in 2012 would have been “totally different”. He said there was a “draft” of an amended particulars of claim which contains the alleged secret deal.
The judge replied: “I am talking about the factual inconsistencies in the case as pleaded.”
……….
Harry completely contradicts himself in his usual paranoid state, and once again reveals private information about William settling his own case. He fails to mention that William donated the compensation he received to charity….

[jet]

Originally Posted by arista

BBC News Text :
[The Guardian also leads with the Prince Harry case
but opts for the headline that he claimed
Queen Elizabeth II had herself threatened
Rupert Murdoch's media firm with
legal action - but was "undermined" by
the then-Prince Charles.]

The Palace has categorially denied that there was any 'secret deal' and William had 'settled' (as many others did at the time in the phone hacking scandal), simply to avoid having to appear in court to give evidence.

[Livia]

He's going to get booed back to California.

[Liam-]

Charlie has clearly had very little respect for his poor mother for a long time and continues to do so after her passing, awful man, she would be ashamed

[GoldHeart]

Harry has become such a repetitive bore now my goodness.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Charlie has clearly had very little respect for his poor mother for a long time and continues to do so after her passing, awful man, she would be ashamed

And your evidence for this inspired conclusion is: "Harry says". Dear me.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by jet

The Palace has categorially denied that there was any 'secret deal' and William had 'settled' (as many others did at the time in the phone hacking scandal), simply to avoid having to appear in court to give evidence.

They would say that wouldn’t they.

[Liam-]

Oop

[Liam-]

And the mirror has already admitted unlawful information gathering against Harry and apologised, also named Charles’ spin doctor as one of their main sources of stories on Harry and Meghan

[jet]

Originally Posted by Liam-

And the mirror has already admitted unlawful information gathering against Harry and apologised, also named Charles’ spin doctor as one of their main sources of stories on Harry and Meghan

I can’t find anything on this being mentioned in the court case by the Mirror or any evidence - could you post the link from where you seen this?
Harry will deserve any compensation he will get from unlawful info gathering, absolutely.

He revealed that William received ‘a very large sum’ in 2020 in compensation from NGN group (once again invading William’s privacy) but he handily failed to mention that William donated the entire amount to Harry’s Invictus Games.
I wonder if Harry will donate anything he gets to charity?

[jet]

If only the Royal family could sue Harry for invading their privacy. He didn’t care what he said about them being splashed all over the tabloids. They didn’t need to get info unlawfully, Harry gave them the gift of never ending headlines with his docu, interviews and book. To make thousands upon thousands of dollars. From his own family.
Not to say he shouldn’t highlight wrongdoing by the press, but he needs to have a good hard look at his own appalling hypocrisy and morality.

[bitontheslide]

the difference being that what Harry is doing is not illegal with the interviews and books

[jet]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

the difference being that what Harry is doing is not illegal with the interviews and books

Well obviously not. When it comes to morality and hypocrisy however....

[joeysteele]

Immaterial of my now thoughts on Prince Harry.

I hope he wins in this case as I do the others presenting cases too along with him.

To possibly get that smug look wiped off totally arrogant and ignorant Piers Morgan's face.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

the difference being that what Harry is doing is not illegal with the interviews and books

He's said all he's said knowing the royals won't sue. Had he made the comments about anyone else, well... He'd be spending even more time in court.

[jet]

"Prince Harry's former girlfriend, Chelsy Davy, decided that "a royal life was not for her" as a result of alleged unlawful information gathering by MGN journalists, the barrister added".

Oh my, if the tabloids hadn’t scared off Chelsey Davy, who Harry said was the ‘love of my life’ she could have been his wife now.

[arista]

SkyNews Text :

[Prince Harry has been criticised for trying to use
armed Met Police officers as
"private bodyguards for the wealthy"]

[Kazanne]

Seems ironic to me that Harry respects his privacy and defends it,but doesn't care about his families privacy as is happy to air their dirty washing in public,isn't it called hypocrisy,I always liked Harry,but he seems to have changed so much the last few years.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Seems ironic to me that Harry respects his privacy and defends it,but doesn't care about his families privacy as is happy to air their dirty washing in public,isn't it called hypocrisy,I always liked Harry,but he seems to have changed so much the last few years.

Thats exactly what he is....exposing stories about his own family especially when he knows they will not publicly defend it.

[arista]

If this is true
all could be better for Harry.

[thesheriff443]

They reckon they have run out of gossip

Meghan has signed with a new hi profile pr group to explore new acting roles and harry is concentrating on the invictus games