FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
OG(den)
|
A climate scientist has admitted overhyping the impact of global
warming on wildfires to ensure his work was published in the prestigious science journal Nature. Dr Patrick Brown, the co-director of the climate and energy team at The Breakthrough Institute, Berkeley, published a paper last week arguing that climate change had increased wildfires in California. The Nature study has been accessed more than 3,000 times online and was cited by 109 news outlets across the globe. ![]() Dr Brown admitted that there were other factors influencing wildfires that he had purposefully omitted – such as poor forestry management and an increase in people starting fires deliberately or accidentally. Dr Brown warned that climate scientists often used irrelevant metrics to create “eye-popping numbers” or used time periods that are not relevant to modern societies. And he said he had discovered it was “taboo” to mention that global warming was often mitigated by changes in technology and resilience. “The first thing the astute climate researcher knows is that his or her work should support the mainstream narrative,” he said. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...urnal%20Nature. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|