FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Like a fine whiskey
|
I know a lot are against one nomination but it certainly changes the game and too much power with one group.
With only one nomination there is less likely to be two from one group up against each other and more like one from each side once a divide occurs. For example; say Kerry, Olivia, Paul, Jenkin, Tom, Hallie, Matty, Zak all nominated Trish and Henry. Then Trish and Henry would get 8 nominations each and would be up, regardless of how everyone else voted. But with one nomination, say those same 8 only 6 used their vote on Trish and 2 on Henry. Chances are another housemate from the bigger group would pick up more than 2 noms so would be up against Trish.
__________________
It's never too late to be who you once could have been... Spoiler: Last edited by Benjamin; 15-10-2023 at 03:47 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|